CVE-2002-0309
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2002-0309 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | mitre |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2002-05-31 04:00:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2025-04-03 01:03:51 UTC |
| Description | SMTP proxy in Symantec Enterprise Firewall (SEF) 6.5.x includes the firewall's physical interface name and address in an SMTP protocol exchange when NAT translation is made to an address other than the firewall, which could allow remote attackers to determine certain firewall configuration information. |
Risk And Classification
Primary CVSS: v2.0 5 from [email protected]
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Problem Types: NVD-CWE-Other | n/a
CVSS v2.0 Breakdown
Access Vector
NetworkAccess Complexity
LowAuthentication
NoneConfidentiality
PartialIntegrity
NoneAvailability
NoneAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Symantec | Enterprise Firewall | 6.5.2 | All | All | All |
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| 'Symantec Enterprise Firewall (SEF) SMTP proxy inconsistencies' - MARC | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | marc.info | |
| Symantec Enterprise Firewall SMTP Proxy Information Leak Vulnerability | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.securityfocus.com | |
| 'Symantec Enterprise Firewall (SEF) SMTP proxy inconsistencies' - MARC | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | marc.info | |
| ISS X-Force Database: sef-smtp-proxy-information (8251): Symantec Enterprise Firewall (SEF) SMTP proxy reveals firewall configuration information | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.iss.net | |
| Symantec Security Response Advisory - Symantec Enterprise Firewall SMTP Proxy Issues | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | securityresponse.symantec.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.