CVE-2002-2204
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2002-2204 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | mitre |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2002-12-31 05:00:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2025-04-03 01:03:51 UTC |
| Description | The default --checksig setting in RPM Package Manager 4.0.4 checks that a package's signature is valid without listing who signed it, which can allow remote attackers to make it appear that a malicious package comes from a trusted source. |
Risk And Classification
Primary CVSS: v2.0 7.5 from [email protected]
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Problem Types: NVD-CWE-Other | n/a
CVSS v2.0 Breakdown
Access Vector
NetworkAccess Complexity
LowAuthentication
NoneConfidentiality
PartialIntegrity
PartialAvailability
PartialAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Redhat | Redhat Package Manager | 4.0.2-71 | All | All | All |
| Application | Redhat | Redhat Package Manager | 4.0.2-72 | All | All | All |
| Application | Redhat | Redhat Package Manager | 4.0.3 | All | All | All |
| Application | Redhat | Redhat Package Manager | 4.0.4 | All | All | All |
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISS X-Force Database: rpm-improper-sig-verification (10011): RPM Package Manager (RPM) improper verification of signed RPM packages | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.iss.net | |
| [Full-Disclosure] RPM verification | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | lists.netsys.com | |
| RPM Package Manager Signature Verification Insufficient User Feedback Weakness | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.securityfocus.com | Patch |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
Vendor Comments And Credit
| Organization | Published | Contributor | Statement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat | 2006-08-30 | Mark J Cox | We do not believe this is a security vulnerability. This is the documented and expected behaviour of rpm. |
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.