CVE-2006-3778
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2006-3778 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLIC |
| Assigner | [email protected] |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2006-07-24 12:19:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2008-09-05 21:08:00 UTC |
| Description | IBM Lotus Notes 6.0, 6.5, and 7.0 does not properly handle replies to e-mail messages with alternate name users when the (1) "Save As Draft" option is used or (2) a "," (comma) is inside the "phrase" portion of an address, which can cause the e-mail to be sent to users that were deleted from the To, CC, and BCC fields, which allows remote attackers to obtain the list of original recipients. |
Risk And Classification
Problem Types: NVD-CWE-Other
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Ibm | Lotus Notes | 6.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Lotus Notes | 6.5 | All | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Lotus Notes | 7.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Lotus Notes | 6.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Lotus Notes | 6.5 | All | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Lotus Notes | 7.0 | All | All | All |
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| SecurityTracker.com Archives - IBM Lotus Notes E-Mail Template May Cause Mail to Be Sent to the Wrong Recipient | SECTRACK | securitytracker.com | |
| Lotus Notes Deleted Mail Recipient Security Issue - Advisories - Secunia | SECUNIA | secunia.com | Vendor Advisory |
| IBM notice: The page you requested cannot be displayed | CONFIRM | www-1.ibm.com | Exploit |
| SecurityTracker.com Archives - IBM Lotus Notes Mail Template Bug May Allow Mail to Be Misaddressed | SECTRACK | securitytracker.com | |
| IBM notice: The page you requested cannot be displayed | CONFIRM | www-1.ibm.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.