CVE-2008-1358
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2008-1358 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | mitre |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2008-03-17 17:44:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-04-23 00:35:47 UTC |
| Description | Stack-based buffer overflow in the IMAP server in Alt-N Technologies MDaemon 9.6.4 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via a FETCH command with a long BODY. |
Risk And Classification
CVSS v2.0 Breakdown
Access Vector
NetworkAccess Complexity
LowAuthentication
SingleConfidentiality
PartialIntegrity
PartialAvailability
PartialAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alt-N MDaemon IMAP Server FETCH Command Remote Buffer Overflow Vulnerability | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.securityfocus.com | |
| MDaemon Buffer Overflow in IMAP Service FETCH Command Lets Remote Authenticated Users Execute Arbitrary Code - SecurityTracker | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.securitytracker.com | |
| MDaemon Release Notes | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | files.altn.com | |
| MDAEMON (POST AUTH) REMOTE R00T IMAP FETCH COMMAND UNIVERSAL EXPLOIT 0day | Be4Mind.com | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.be4mind.com | |
| MDaemon IMAP server 9.6.4 (FETCH) Remote Buffer Overflow Exploit | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.exploit-db.com | |
| Webmail : Solution de messagerie professionnelle - OVHcloud- OVH | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.vupen.com | Vendor Advisory |
| IBM X-Force Exchange | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com | |
| MDaemon IMAP Server "FETCH" Command Buffer Overflow - Secunia Advisories - Vulnerability Intelligence - Secunia.com | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | secunia.com | Vendor Advisory |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.