CVE-2010-3736
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2010-3736 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | mitre |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2010-10-05 18:00:33 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-04-29 01:13:23 UTC |
| Description | Memory leak in the Relational Data Services component in IBM DB2 UDB 9.5 before FP6a, when the connection concentrator is enabled, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (heap memory consumption) by using a different code page than the database server. |
Risk And Classification
CVSS v2.0 Breakdown
Access Vector
NetworkAccess Complexity
LowAuthentication
SingleConfidentiality
NoneIntegrity
NoneAvailability
PartialAV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | All | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp1 | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp2 | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp2a | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp3 | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp3a | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp3b | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp4 | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp4a | All | All |
| Application | Ibm | Db2 | 9.5 | fp5 | All | All |
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| public.dhe.ibm.com/ps/products/db2/fixes/english-us/aparlist/db2_v95/APARLIST.TXT | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | public.dhe.ibm.com | |
| Repository / Oval Repository | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | oval.cisecurity.org | |
| IBM IC68182: MEMORY LEAK IN APPLICATION HEAP WHEN CLIENT AND SERVER HAVE DIFFERENT CODE PAGE AND CONNECTION CONCENTRATOR IS ON - United States | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www-01.ibm.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.