CVE-2012-3935
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2012-3935 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | cisco |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2012-09-12 23:55:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-04-29 01:13:23 UTC |
| Description | Cisco Unified Presence (CUP) before 8.6(3) and Jabber Extensible Communications Platform (aka Jabber XCP) before 5.3 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process crash) via a crafted XMPP stream header, aka Bug ID CSCtu32832. |
Risk And Classification
CVSS v2.0 Breakdown
Access Vector
NetworkAccess Complexity
LowAuthentication
NoneConfidentiality
NoneIntegrity
NoneAvailability
CompleteAV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Cisco | Jabber Extensible Communications Platform | All | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 1.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(1\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(2\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(3\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(4\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(5\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(6\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0\(7\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0_1 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 6.0_2 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(1\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(2\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(3\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(4\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(5\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(6\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(7\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(8\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 7.0\(9\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.0 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.0\(1\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.0\(2\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.0\(3\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.0\(4\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.5 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.5\(1\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.5\(2\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.5\(3\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | 8.6\(1\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Unified Presence | All | All | All | All |
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| osvdb.org/85421 | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | osvdb.org | |
| About Secunia Research | Flexera | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | secunia.com | |
| IBM X-Force Exchange | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com | |
| Cisco Unified Presence and Jabber Extensible Communications Platform Stream Header Processing Flaw Lets Remote Users Deny Service - SecurityTracker | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.securitytracker.com | |
| Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Unified Presence and Jabber Extensible Communications Platform Stream Header Denial of Service Vulnerability | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | tools.cisco.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.