CVE-2013-5730
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2013-5730 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | mitre |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2013-11-20 13:19:42 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-04-29 01:13:23 UTC |
| Description | Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in D-Link DSL-2740B Gateway with firmware EU_1.00 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) enable or disable Wireless MAC Address Filters via a wlFltMode action to wlmacflt.cmd, (2) enable or disable firewall protections via a request to scdmz.cmd, or (3) enable or disable remote management via a save action to scsrvcntr.cmd. |
Risk And Classification
Primary CVSS: v2.0 6.8 from [email protected]
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
EPSS: 0.070620000 probability, percentile 0.915320000 (date 2026-04-29)
Problem Types: CWE-352 | n/a
CVSS v2.0 Breakdown
Access Vector
NetworkAccess Complexity
MediumAuthentication
NoneConfidentiality
PartialIntegrity
PartialAvailability
PartialAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware | Dlink | Dsl-2740b | - | All | All | All |
| Operating System | Dlink | Dsl-2740b Firmware | 1.00 | All | All | All |
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-Link DSL-2740B Multiple CSRF Vulnerabilities | CVE-2013-5730 | Ivano Binetti | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.webapp-security.com | |
| CSRF Exploit | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | www.webapp-security.com | Exploit |
| D-Link DSL-2740B Cross Site Request Forgery ≈ Packet Storm | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | packetstormsecurity.com | Exploit |
| D-Link Technical Support | af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 | securityadvisories.dlink.com | Vendor Advisory |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.