CVE-2018-0199
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2018-0199 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLIC |
| Assigner | [email protected] |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2018-02-22 00:29:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2019-10-09 23:31:00 UTC |
| Description | A vulnerability in Cisco Jabber Client Framework (JCF) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper neutralization of script in attributes in a web page. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by executing arbitrary JavaScript in the Jabber client of the recipient. An exploit could allow the attacker to perform remote code execution. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCve53989. |
Risk And Classification
Problem Types: CWE-79
NVD Known Affected Configurations (CPE 2.3)
| Type | Vendor | Product | Version | Update | Edition | Language |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | - | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | 11.9 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | 11.9(0) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | 11.9\(0\) | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | - | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | 11.9 | All | All | All |
| Application | Cisco | Jabber | 11.9\(0\) | All | All | All |
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco Jabber CVE-2018-0199 Cross Site Scripting Vulnerability | BID | www.securityfocus.com | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry |
| Cisco Jabber for Windows Input Validation Flaw in Web Page Attributes Lets Remote Users Conduct Cross-Site Scripting Attacks - SecurityTracker | SECTRACK | www.securitytracker.com | Third Party Advisory, VDB Entry |
| Cisco Jabber Client Framework for Windows and Mac Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability | CONFIRM | tools.cisco.com | Vendor Advisory |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.