Ghost: Server-Side Request Forgery in Bookmark Fetching
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2026-105647 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | GitHub_M |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2026-10-05 20:17:13 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-10-05 20:17:13 UTC |
| Description | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.54.1 until 6.65.0, a validation issue allowed some functionality, such as Webmentions, to be abused by an unauthenticated user to make limited HTTP requests to hosts in the Ghost server's internal network. A successful attack would not result in any response data being returned. This issue is fixed in version 6.65.0. |
Risk And Classification
Primary CVSS: v3.1 4 MEDIUM from [email protected]
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Problem Types: CWE-367 | CWE-918 | CWE-367 CWE-367: Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition | CWE-918 CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
| Version | Source | Type | Score | Severity | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | [email protected] | Secondary | 4 | MEDIUM | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N |
| 3.1 | CNA | DECLARED | 4 | MEDIUM | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N |
CVSS v3.1 Breakdown
Attack Vector
NetworkAttack Complexity
HighPrivileges Required
NoneUser Interaction
NoneScope
ChangedConfidentiality
LowIntegrity
NoneAvailability
NoneCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/commit/3f8594eb53de883ac017545c358f59039cb152de | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/releases/tag/v6.65.0 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/security/advisories/GHSA-322m-ff4g-9vx9 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/30918 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.