Possible NULL Dereference When Processing CMS KeyTransportRecipientInfo
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2026-28390 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | openssl |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2026-04-07 22:16:21 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-04-08 21:27:00 UTC |
| Description | Issue summary: During processing of a crafted CMS EnvelopedData message with KeyTransportRecipientInfo a NULL pointer dereference can happen. Impact summary: Applications that process attacker-controlled CMS data may crash before authentication or cryptographic operations occur resulting in Denial of Service. When a CMS EnvelopedData message that uses KeyTransportRecipientInfo with RSA-OAEP encryption is processed, the optional parameters field of RSA-OAEP SourceFunc algorithm identifier is examined without checking for its presence. This results in a NULL pointer dereference if the field is missing. Applications and services that call CMS_decrypt() on untrusted input (e.g., S/MIME processing or CMS-based protocols) are vulnerable. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. |
Risk And Classification
EPSS: 0.000290000 probability, percentile 0.084220000 (date 2026-04-09)
Problem Types: CWE-476 | CWE-476 CWE-476 NULL Pointer Dereference
Vendor Declared Affected Products
| Source | Vendor | Product | Version | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 3.6.0 3.6.2 semver | Not specified |
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 3.5.0 3.5.6 semver | Not specified |
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 3.4.0 3.4.5 semver | Not specified |
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 3.3.0 3.3.7 semver | Not specified |
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 3.0.0 3.0.20 semver | Not specified |
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 1.1.1 1.1.1zg custom | Not specified |
| CNA | OpenSSL | OpenSSL | affected 1.0.2 1.0.2zp custom | Not specified |
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260407.txt | [email protected] | openssl-library.org | |
| github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01194a8f1941115cd0383bfa91c736dd3993c8bc | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fd2f1a6cf53b9ceeca723a001aa4b825d7c7ee75 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2e39b7a6993be445fddb9fbce316fa756e0397b6 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/af2a5fecd3e71a29e7568f9c1453dec5cebbaff4 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ea7b4ea4f9f853521ba34830cbcadc970d2e0788 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
Vendor Comments And Credit
Discovery Credit
CNA: Muhammad Daffa (en)
CNA: Zhanpeng Liu (Tencent Xuanwu Lab) (en)
CNA: Guannan Wang (Tencent Xuanwu Lab) (en)
CNA: Guancheng Li (Tencent Xuanwu Lab) (en)
CNA: Joshua Rogers (en)
CNA: Chanho Kim (en)
CNA: Neil Horman (en)
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.