unshare: fix unshare_fs() handling
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2026-43472 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | Linux |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2026-05-08 15:17:00 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-05-12 14:10:27 UTC |
| Description | In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: unshare: fix unshare_fs() handling There's an unpleasant corner case in unshare(2), when we have a CLONE_NEWNS in flags and current->fs hadn't been shared at all; in that case copy_mnt_ns() gets passed current->fs instead of a private copy, which causes interesting warts in proof of correctness] > I guess if private means fs->users == 1, the condition could still be true. Unfortunately, it's worse than just a convoluted proof of correctness. Consider the case when we have CLONE_NEWCGROUP in addition to CLONE_NEWNS (and current->fs->users == 1). We pass current->fs to copy_mnt_ns(), all right. Suppose it succeeds and flips current->fs->{pwd,root} to corresponding locations in the new namespace. Now we proceed to copy_cgroup_ns(), which fails (e.g. with -ENOMEM). We call put_mnt_ns() on the namespace created by copy_mnt_ns(), it's destroyed and its mount tree is dissolved, but... current->fs->root and current->fs->pwd are both left pointing to now detached mounts. They are pinning those, so it's not a UAF, but it leaves the calling process with unshare(2) failing with -ENOMEM _and_ leaving it with pwd and root on detached isolated mounts. The last part is clearly a bug. There is other fun related to that mess (races with pivot_root(), including the one between pivot_root() and fork(), of all things), but this one is easy to isolate and fix - treat CLONE_NEWNS as "allocate a new fs_struct even if it hadn't been shared in the first place". Sure, we could go for something like "if both CLONE_NEWNS *and* one of the things that might end up failing after copy_mnt_ns() call in create_new_namespaces() are set, force allocation of new fs_struct", but let's keep it simple - the cost of copy_fs_struct() is trivial. Another benefit is that copy_mnt_ns() with CLONE_NEWNS *always* gets a freshly allocated fs_struct, yet to be attached to anything. That seriously simplifies the analysis... FWIW, that bug had been there since the introduction of unshare(2) ;-/ |
Risk And Classification
EPSS: 0.000240000 probability, percentile 0.070210000 (date 2026-05-11)
Vendor Declared Affected Products
| Source | Vendor | Product | Version | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f 845bf3c6963a52096d0d3866e4a92db77a0c03d8 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f d3ffc8f13034af895531a02c30b1fe3a34b46432 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f d0d99f60538ddb4a62ccaac2168d8f448965f083 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f d7963d6997fea86a6def242ac36198b86655f912 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f aa9ebc084505fb26dd90f4d7a249045aad152043 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f af8f4be3b68ac8caa41c8e5ead0eeaf5e85e42d0 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f 42e21e74061b0ebbd859839f81acf10efad02a27 git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 741a295130606143edbf9fc740f633dbc1e6225f 6c4b2243cb6c0755159bd567130d5e12e7b10d9f git | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | affected 2.6.16 | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 2.6.16 semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 5.10.253 5.10.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 5.15.203 5.15.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 6.1.167 6.1.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 6.6.130 6.6.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 6.12.78 6.12.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 6.18.19 6.18.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 6.19.9 6.19.* semver | Not specified |
| CNA | Linux | Linux | unaffected 7.0 * original_commit_for_fix | Not specified |
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/42e21e74061b0ebbd859839f81acf10efad02a27 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/845bf3c6963a52096d0d3866e4a92db77a0c03d8 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/d3ffc8f13034af895531a02c30b1fe3a34b46432 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/d7963d6997fea86a6def242ac36198b86655f912 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/d0d99f60538ddb4a62ccaac2168d8f448965f083 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa9ebc084505fb26dd90f4d7a249045aad152043 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c4b2243cb6c0755159bd567130d5e12e7b10d9f | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| git.kernel.org/stable/c/af8f4be3b68ac8caa41c8e5ead0eeaf5e85e42d0 | 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 | git.kernel.org | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.