YesWiki: Bazar form-field templates still apply `|raw('html')` to `field.label` / `field.hint` in attribute and label-body contexts — stored XSS in form renders (sibling class of commit `e6b66aa`)
Summary
| CVE | CVE-2026-52772 |
|---|---|
| State | PUBLISHED |
| Assigner | GitHub_M |
| Source Priority | CVE Program / NVD first with legacy fallback |
| Published | 2026-09-05 00:17:20 UTC |
| Updated | 2026-09-05 00:17:20 UTC |
| Description | YesWiki is a wiki system written in PHP. Prior to version 4.6.6, Bazar form-field templates still apply |raw('html') to field.label / field.hint in attribute and label-body contexts, resulting stored XSS in form renders. This issue has been patched in version 4.6.6. |
Risk And Classification
Primary CVSS: v3.1 5.5 MEDIUM from [email protected]
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Problem Types: CWE-79 | CWE-116 | CWE-79 CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') | CWE-116 CWE-116: Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output
| Version | Source | Type | Score | Severity | Vector |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | [email protected] | Secondary | 5.5 | MEDIUM | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N |
| 3.1 | CNA | DECLARED | 5.5 | MEDIUM | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N |
CVSS v3.1 Breakdown
Attack Vector
NetworkAttack Complexity
LowPrivileges Required
HighUser Interaction
NoneScope
ChangedConfidentiality
LowIntegrity
LowAvailability
NoneCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Vendor Declared Affected Products
References
| Reference | Source | Link | Tags |
|---|---|---|---|
| github.com/YesWiki/yeswiki/releases/tag/v4.6.6 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/YesWiki/yeswiki/commit/5d1a4d07fecb0706f33e5dfbbe6ff5ef1892b2a7 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| github.com/YesWiki/yeswiki/security/advisories/GHSA-xc7j-3g8q-9vh4 | [email protected] | github.com | |
| CVE Program record | CVE.ORG | www.cve.org | canonical |
| NVD vulnerability detail | NVD | nvd.nist.gov | canonical, analysis |
No vendor comments have been submitted for this CVE.
There are currently no legacy QID mappings associated with this CVE.