{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T12:45:55+00:00","cve":"CVE-2009-3297","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2009-3297","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2009-3297.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3297","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3297"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2009-3297","description":"** REJECT **  DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789.  Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs.  Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.","state":"REJECT","assigner":"cve@mitre.org","published_at":"2010-03-02 18:30:00","updated_at":"2023-11-07 02:04:00"},"problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"references":[{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-3297","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-3297","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"data_type":"CVE","data_format":"MITRE","data_version":"4.0","CVE_data_meta":{"ID":"CVE-2009-3297","ASSIGNER":"cve@mitre.org","STATE":"REJECT"},"description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"** REJECT **  DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789.  Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs.  Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage."}]}},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2010-03-02 18:30:00","lastModifiedDate":"2023-11-07 02:04:00","problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"configurations":{"CVE_data_version":"4.0","nodes":[]}},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2009","CveId":"3297","Ordinal":"40515","Title":"CVE-2009-3297","CVE":"CVE-2009-3297","Year":"2009"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2009","CveId":"3297","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"** REJECT **\n\nDO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER.  ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789.  Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs.  Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate.  All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.","Type":"Description","Title":null},{"CveYear":"2009","CveId":"3297","Ordinal":"2","NoteData":"2010-03-02","Type":"Other","Title":"Published"}]}}}