{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T08:17:09+00:00","cve":"CVE-2011-1473","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2011-1473","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2011-1473.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1473","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1473"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2011-1473","description":"OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"mitre","published_at":"2012-06-16 21:55:02","updated_at":"2026-04-29 01:13:23"},"problem_types":["CWE-264","n/a"],"metrics":[{"version":"2.0","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5","severity":"","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P","data":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P","baseScore":5,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"LOW","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"PARTIAL"}}],"references":[{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html","name":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"[TLS] SSL Renegotiation DOS","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html","name":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Re: [TLS] SSL Renegotiation DOS","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-02/0061.html","name":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-02/0061.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"-1","archivestatus":"404"},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","name":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"707065 – (CVE-2011-1473) CVE-2011-1473 openssl: DoS via repeated SSL session renegotiations","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","name":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"SSL computational DoS mitigation | Vincent Bernat","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","name":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"SSL/TLS and Computational DoS - Educated Guesswork","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html","name":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Re: [TLS] SSL Renegotiation DOS","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2","name":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"oss-security - SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html","name":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Re: [TLS] SSL Renegotiation DOS","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d%40%3Ccommits.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d%40%3Ccommits.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html","name":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Re: [TLS] SSL Renegotiation DOS","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2","name":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"'[security bulletin] HPSBMU02776 SSRT100852 rev.1 - HP Onboard Administrator (OA), Remote Unauthorize' - MARC","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc98eaa3f8223ac75aa5969f717954d8cbc9f3a9d8b7a6156a54fa557%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc98eaa3f8223ac75aa5969f717954d8cbc9f3a9d8b7a6156a54fa557%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","name":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"SSL Renegotiation Denial of Service ‹ Jorge Orchilles","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"404","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d@%3Ccommits.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-commits] 20210311 [rocketmq] branch develop updated: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20190527 [GitHub] [rocketmq] bix29 opened a new issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20190801 [GitHub] [rocketmq] duhenglucky commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20191024 [GitHub] [rocketmq] Journey-x commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] coveralls commented on issue #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits opened a new pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"404"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling closed issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling merged pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20210327 [GitHub] [rocketmq] liufeiguo commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"404"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"404"},{"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc98eaa3f8223ac75aa5969f717954d8cbc9f3a9d8b7a6156a54fa557@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E","name":"MLIST:[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz removed a comment on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Pony Mail!","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"404"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2011-1473","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1473","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","version":"affected n/a","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8m","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8m","cpe7":"beta1","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8n","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8o","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8p","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8r","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8s","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8t","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8u","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8v","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8w","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"0.9.8x","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2011","cve_id":"1473","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"0.9.8k","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"openssl","cpe5":"openssl","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-08-06T22:28:41.480Z","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"},{"name":"20140214 ESA-2014-009: RSA BSAFE SSL-J Multiple Vulnerabilities","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-02/0061.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"},{"name":"SSRT100852","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_HP","x_transferred"],"url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"},{"name":"HPSBMU02776","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_HP","x_transferred"],"url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20190527 [GitHub] [rocketmq] bix29 opened a new issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20190801 [GitHub] [rocketmq] duhenglucky commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20191024 [GitHub] [rocketmq] Journey-x commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] coveralls commented on issue #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits opened a new pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling closed issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-commits] 20210311 [rocketmq] branch develop updated: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d%40%3Ccommits.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling merged pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210327 [GitHub] [rocketmq] liufeiguo commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz removed a comment on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc98eaa3f8223ac75aa5969f717954d8cbc9f3a9d8b7a6156a54fa557%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"}],"title":"CVE Program Container"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"datePublic":"2011-03-15T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment"}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2021-04-20T15:06:19.000Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","shortName":"mitre"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"},{"name":"20140214 ESA-2014-009: RSA BSAFE SSL-J Multiple Vulnerabilities","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-02/0061.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"},{"name":"SSRT100852","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_HP"],"url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"},{"name":"HPSBMU02776","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_HP"],"url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20190527 [GitHub] [rocketmq] bix29 opened a new issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20190801 [GitHub] [rocketmq] duhenglucky commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20191024 [GitHub] [rocketmq] Journey-x commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] coveralls commented on issue #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits opened a new pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling closed issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-commits] 20210311 [rocketmq] branch develop updated: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d%40%3Ccommits.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling merged pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210327 [GitHub] [rocketmq] liufeiguo commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz removed a comment on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc98eaa3f8223ac75aa5969f717954d8cbc9f3a9d8b7a6156a54fa557%40%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"}],"tags":["disputed"],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"cve@mitre.org","ID":"CVE-2011-1473","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"** DISPUTED ** OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment."}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://vincent.bernat.im/en/blog/2011-ssl-dos-mitigation.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07567.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07577.html"},{"name":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707065"},{"name":"20140214 ESA-2014-009: RSA BSAFE SSL-J Multiple Vulnerabilities","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2014-02/0061.html"},{"name":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://www.educatedguesswork.org/2011/10/ssltls_and_computational_dos.html"},{"name":"[oss-security] 20110708 SSL renegotiation DoS CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/08/2"},{"name":"SSRT100852","refsource":"HP","url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110318 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07576.html"},{"name":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://orchilles.com/2011/03/ssl-renegotiation-dos.html"},{"name":"HPSBMU02776","refsource":"HP","url":"http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07553.html"},{"name":"[tls] 20110315 Re: SSL Renegotiation DOS","refsource":"MLIST","url":"http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg07564.html"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20190527 [GitHub] [rocketmq] bix29 opened a new issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/142b93d261e8ac7c5ceffdce848d622404abc1c286bbc999f43a9e10@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20190801 [GitHub] [rocketmq] duhenglucky commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6121becfdd23f9aeb675d5db80616536277d5931d6cde9dca292e509@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20191024 [GitHub] [rocketmq] Journey-x commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8be38d35654441140db8eb3f7433524b3653ac3fdc26e2fa94626a3a@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits commented on issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1e33410bb5c81536e7fe14b51fa83e7bfd9445db61fd10c134792bde@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] coveralls commented on issue #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r298a09a2b98446b27217d719e877c643b6d13fac0bcafe04696a446b@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20200305 [GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits opened a new pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r77fe575893261889b983e067293be72fa1f8c6305ede9fdbc404c514@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling closed issue #1233: TLS Client-initiated renegotiation attack (CVE-2011-1473)","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5e595b91f00613dafa635852121d45b161e8b5c3eba4551aeccc6483@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-commits] 20210311 [rocketmq] branch develop updated: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3822ad69442291562c2ab41132fc49780d269e8b52deb458b7060f6d@%3Ccommits.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling merged pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8680f41bcdad13c3f267cb868b45e5fb1f57df8b39d25193f7d66500@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210311 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra95c355827b3c96c8013ed8e0666c851581651be2524f3d28cd4fe71@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210327 [GitHub] [rocketmq] liufeiguo commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r13a07a09f98b2841193dbf17a47c7f09b464e0747a1d3e7298ad4c81@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz commented on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9e8ae0356af3ec4f7780ca651b770721d287d4d55f62f4f754e0a6f@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"},{"name":"[rocketmq-dev] 20210420 [GitHub] [rocketmq] mouzz removed a comment on pull request #1820: [ISSUE #1233] Fix CVE-2011-1473","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc98eaa3f8223ac75aa5969f717954d8cbc9f3a9d8b7a6156a54fa557@%3Cdev.rocketmq.apache.org%3E"}]}}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","assignerShortName":"mitre","cveId":"CVE-2011-1473","datePublished":"2012-06-16T21:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2011-03-21T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2024-08-06T22:28:41.480Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2012-06-16 21:55:02","lastModifiedDate":"2026-04-29 01:13:23","problem_types":["CWE-264","n/a"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV2":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P","baseScore":5,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"LOW","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"PARTIAL"},"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","exploitabilityScore":10,"impactScore":2.9,"acInsufInfo":false,"obtainAllPrivilege":false,"obtainUserPrivilege":false,"obtainOtherPrivilege":false,"userInteractionRequired":false}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8m:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"3C9BF2DD-85EF-49CF-8D83-0DB46449E333"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8m:beta1:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"6AEBE689-3952-46F0-BACA-BB03041C6D36"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8n:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"86C46AB8-52E5-4385-9C5C-F63FF9DB82AA"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8o:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"564AA4E7-223E-48D8-B3E0-A461969CF530"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8p:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A82CFB41-BEA5-4B5F-BCAA-9BAED22EEAF0"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8r:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"EB15C1F3-0DE8-4A50-B17C-618ECA58AABF"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8s:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"45491BD3-7C62-4422-B7DA-CB2741890FBA"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8t:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"499E52F3-4B34-4C47-8ABF-292928EBAA5F"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8u:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"D530BE19-ADCF-4B5C-99E0-2B9A1DE7717F"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8v:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A7540155-3629-4C76-9C67-8A8E0C1067F1"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8w:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"419BBCCD-6F8A-418A-BA02-56267B11D948"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:0.9.8x:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"8A3A2AF8-C7DD-43D0-B03F-37E7EB735C1D"}]}]},{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"0.9.8k","matchCriteriaId":"EB35F63F-7856-42EE-87A6-7EC7F10C2032"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2011","CveId":"1473","Ordinal":"1","Title":"CVE-2011-1473","CVE":"CVE-2011-1473","Year":"2011"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2011","CveId":"1473","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, and 0.9.8m through 1.x, does not properly restrict client-initiated renegotiation within the SSL and TLS protocols, which might make it easier for remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by performing many renegotiations within a single connection, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-5094.  NOTE: it can also be argued that it is the responsibility of server deployments, not a security library, to prevent or limit renegotiation when it is inappropriate within a specific environment","Type":"Description","Title":"CVE-2011-1473"},{"CveYear":"2011","CveId":"1473","Ordinal":"2","NoteData":"2012-06-16","Type":"Other","Title":"Published"},{"CveYear":"2011","CveId":"1473","Ordinal":"3","NoteData":"2021-04-20","Type":"Other","Title":"Modified"}]}}}