{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T20:30:29+00:00","cve":"CVE-2012-3372","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2012-3372","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2012-3372.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3372","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3372"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2012-3372","description":"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"redhat","published_at":"2012-07-09 10:20:44","updated_at":"2026-04-29 01:13:23"},"problem_types":["CWE-310","n/a","CWE-noinfo Not enough information"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"ADP","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"2.0","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5.8","severity":"","vector":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","data":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","baseScore":5.8,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"MEDIUM","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"PARTIAL","integrityImpact":"PARTIAL","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}}],"references":[{"url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/","name":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Customer Knowledge Post – SSL Bridging, Cyberoam’s Approach | Cyberoam : Securing You","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"-1","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html","name":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"-1","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt","name":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"text/plain","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372","name":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Security vulnerability found in Cyberoam DPI devices (CVE-2012-3372) | The Tor Blog","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/","name":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Security firm in Tor Project 'mass surveillance' row responds • The Register","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2012-3372","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-3372","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","version":"affected n/a","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2012","cve_id":"3372","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"h","cpe4":"elitecore","cpe5":"cyberoam_unified_threat_management","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-08-06T20:05:12.354Z","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"},{"name":"20120703 Cyberoam advisory","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ","x_transferred"],"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}],"title":"CVE Program Container"},{"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"}},{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2012-3372","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2025-01-21T19:32:24.195135Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"CWE-noinfo Not enough information","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key."}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z","orgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","shortName":"redhat"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"},{"name":"20120703 Cyberoam advisory","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_BUGTRAQ"],"url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}],"tags":["disputed"],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"secalert@redhat.com","ID":"CVE-2012-3372","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"** DISPUTED ** The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.\""}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://media.torproject.org/misc/2012-07-03-cyberoam-CVE-2012-3372.txt"},{"name":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/07/cyberoam_tor_ssl_spying_flap/"},{"name":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://blog.torproject.org/blog/security-vulnerability-found-cyberoam-dpi-devices-cve-2012-3372"},{"name":"20120703 Cyberoam advisory","refsource":"BUGTRAQ","url":"http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-07/0021.html"},{"name":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://blog.cyberoam.com/2012/07/ssl-bridging-cyberoam-approach/"}]}}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","assignerShortName":"redhat","cveId":"CVE-2012-3372","datePublished":"2012-07-09T10:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2012-06-14T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2025-01-27T21:07:51.463Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2012-07-09 10:20:44","lastModifiedDate":"2026-04-29 01:13:23","problem_types":["CWE-310","n/a","CWE-noinfo Not enough information"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":5.2}],"cvssMetricV2":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N","baseScore":5.8,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"MEDIUM","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"PARTIAL","integrityImpact":"PARTIAL","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","exploitabilityScore":8.6,"impactScore":4.9,"acInsufInfo":false,"obtainAllPrivilege":false,"obtainUserPrivilege":false,"obtainOtherPrivilege":false,"userInteractionRequired":true}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:h:elitecore:cyberoam_unified_threat_management:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"9F6D1E67-3012-4230-AAA8-3770ADC6BD0C"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2012","CveId":"3372","Ordinal":"1","Title":"CVE-2012-3372","CVE":"CVE-2012-3372","Year":"2012"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2012","CveId":"3372","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"The default configuration of Cyberoam UTM appliances uses the same Certification Authority certificate and same private key across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers by leveraging the presence of the Cyberoam_SSL_CA certificate in a list of trusted root certification authorities.  NOTE: the vendor disputes the significance of this issue because the appliance \"does not allow import or export of the foresaid private key.","Type":"Description","Title":"CVE-2012-3372"},{"CveYear":"2012","CveId":"3372","Ordinal":"2","NoteData":"2012-07-09","Type":"Other","Title":"Published"}]}}}