{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T07:32:09+00:00","cve":"CVE-2017-17847","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2017-17847","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2017-17847.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-17847","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17847"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2017-17847","description":"An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"mitre","published_at":"2017-12-27 17:08:19","updated_at":"2025-04-20 01:37:25"},"problem_types":["CWE-347","n/a"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.0","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","data":{"version":"3.0","vectorString":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"2.0","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5","severity":"","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","data":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","baseScore":5,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"LOW","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"PARTIAL","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070","name":"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Third Party Advisory"],"title":"Debian -- Security Information -- DSA-4070-1 enigmail","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html","name":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"Re: [Enigmail] [ANN] Enigmail v1.9.9 available","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html","name":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Third Party Advisory"],"title":"[SECURITY] [DSA 4070-1] enigmail security update","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html","name":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":[],"title":"[SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/","name":"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Third Party Advisory"],"title":"Enigmail / Bugs / #709 Signature Spoofing Attacks using multipart/related","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf","name":"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"application/pdf","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html","name":"MISC:https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html","refsource":"MITRE","tags":[],"title":"Re: [Enigmail] [ANN] Enigmail v1.9.9 available","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-17847","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17847","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","version":"affected n/a","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2017","cve_id":"17847","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"debian","cpe5":"debian_linux","cpe6":"8.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2017","cve_id":"17847","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"debian","cpe5":"debian_linux","cpe6":"9.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2017","cve_id":"17847","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"enigmail","cpe5":"enigmail","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2017","cve_id":"17847","cve":"CVE-2017-17847","epss":"0.002910000","percentile":"0.525200000","score_date":"2026-05-19","updated_at":"2026-05-20 00:11:25"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-08-05T21:06:49.077Z","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"},{"name":"[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"},{"name":"DSA-4070","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_DEBIAN","x_transferred"],"url":"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"}],"title":"CVE Program Container"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"datePublic":"2017-12-22T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2018-02-02T10:57:01.000Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","shortName":"mitre"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users%40enigmail.net/msg04280.html"},{"name":"[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update","tags":["mailing-list","x_refsource_MLIST"],"url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"},{"name":"DSA-4070","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_DEBIAN"],"url":"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"}],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"cve@mitre.org","ID":"CVE-2017-17847","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format."}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://enigmail.net/download/other/Enigmail%20Pentest%20Report%20by%20Cure53%20-%20Excerpt.pdf"},{"name":"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://sourceforge.net/p/enigmail/bugs/709/"},{"name":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2017/msg00333.html"},{"name":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://www.mail-archive.com/enigmail-users@enigmail.net/msg04280.html"},{"name":"[debian-lts-announce] 20171223 [SECURITY] [DLA 1219-1] enigmail security update","refsource":"MLIST","url":"https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00021.html"},{"name":"DSA-4070","refsource":"DEBIAN","url":"https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4070"}]}}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","assignerShortName":"mitre","cveId":"CVE-2017-17847","datePublished":"2017-12-22T23:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2017-12-22T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2024-08-05T21:06:49.077Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2017-12-27 17:08:19","lastModifiedDate":"2025-04-20 01:37:25","problem_types":["CWE-347","n/a"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV30":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.0","vectorString":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}],"cvssMetricV2":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N","baseScore":5,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"LOW","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"PARTIAL","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","exploitabilityScore":10,"impactScore":2.9,"acInsufInfo":false,"obtainAllPrivilege":false,"obtainUserPrivilege":false,"obtainOtherPrivilege":false,"userInteractionRequired":false}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:enigmail:enigmail:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"1.9.9","matchCriteriaId":"FB028A65-2C8A-4D9C-88F8-78BAE49E77C4"}]}]},{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"C11E6FB0-C8C0-4527-9AA0-CB9B316F8F43"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"DEECE5FC-CACF-4496-A3E7-164736409252"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"17847","Ordinal":"1","Title":"CVE-2017-17847","CVE":"CVE-2017-17847","Year":"2017"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"17847","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"An issue was discovered in Enigmail before 1.9.9. Signature spoofing is possible because the UI does not properly distinguish between an attachment signature, and a signature that applies to the entire containing message, aka TBE-01-021. This is demonstrated by an e-mail message with an attachment that is a signed e-mail message in message/rfc822 format.","Type":"Description","Title":"CVE-2017-17847"},{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"17847","Ordinal":"2","NoteData":"2017-12-22","Type":"Other","Title":"Published"},{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"17847","Ordinal":"3","NoteData":"2018-02-02","Type":"Other","Title":"Modified"}]}}}