{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T14:49:02+00:00","cve":"CVE-2017-9230","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2017-9230","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2017-9230.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9230","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9230"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2017-9230","description":"The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof-of-Work function execution should be independent. NOTE: a number of persons feel that this methodology is a benign mining optimization, not a vulnerability","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"mitre","published_at":"2017-05-24 16:29:00","updated_at":"2025-04-20 01:37:25"},"problem_types":["CWE-338","n/a","CWE-338 CWE-338 Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"ADP","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.0","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","data":{"version":"3.0","vectorString":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"2.0","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5","severity":"","vector":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","data":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","baseScore":5,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"LOW","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"PARTIAL","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}}],"references":[{"url":"http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf","name":"http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Technical Description"],"title":"","mime":"application/pdf","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html","name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Mailing List","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"[bitcoin-dev] Treating ‘ASICBOOST’ as a Security Vulnerability","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html","name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Mailing List","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"[bitcoin-dev] Treating ‘ASICBOOST’ as a Security Vulnerability","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html","name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Mailing List","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"[bitcoin-dev] Treating ‘ASICBOOST’ as a Security Vulnerability","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657","name":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Third Party Advisory","VDB Entry"],"title":"Bitcoin Proof-of-Work Algorithm CVE-2017-9230 Security Weakness","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf","name":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Technical Description"],"title":"","mime":"application/pdf","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html","name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Mailing List","Technical Description","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"[bitcoin-dev] BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the\tBitcoin POW function","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"200","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2017-9230","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-9230","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","version":"affected n/a","platforms":[]},{"source":"ADP","vendor":"bitcoin","product":"bitcoin","version":"affected -","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2017","cve_id":"9230","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"bitcoin","cpe5":"bitcoin","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"affected":[{"cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:bitcoin:bitcoin:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unknown","product":"bitcoin","vendor":"bitcoin","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"-"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"}},{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2017-9230","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2024-04-23T15:55:28.785269Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-338","description":"CWE-338 Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-06-04T17:11:52.036Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"},{"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-08-05T17:02:43.380Z","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html"},{"name":"98657","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC","x_transferred"],"url":"http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf"}],"title":"CVE Program Container"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"datePublic":"2017-05-24T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof-of-Work function execution should be independent. NOTE: a number of persons feel that this methodology is a benign mining optimization, not a vulnerability"}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2018-06-13T17:57:01.000Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","shortName":"mitre"},"references":[{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html"},{"name":"98657","tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_BID"],"url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html"},{"tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf"}],"tags":["disputed"],"x_legacyV4Record":{"CVE_data_meta":{"ASSIGNER":"cve@mitre.org","ID":"CVE-2017-9230","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"n/a","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"n/a"}]}}]},"vendor_name":"n/a"}]}},"data_format":"MITRE","data_type":"CVE","data_version":"4.0","description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"** DISPUTED ** The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof-of-Work function execution should be independent. NOTE: a number of persons feel that this methodology is a benign mining optimization, not a vulnerability."}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"n/a"}]}]},"references":{"reference_data":[{"name":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1604/1604.00575.pdf"},{"name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html"},{"name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014351.html"},{"name":"98657","refsource":"BID","url":"http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98657"},{"name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014352.html"},{"name":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html","refsource":"MISC","url":"https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-May/014349.html"},{"name":"http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf","refsource":"MISC","url":"http://www.mit.edu/~jlrubin//public/pdfs/Asicboost.pdf"}]}}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","assignerShortName":"mitre","cveId":"CVE-2017-9230","datePublished":"2017-05-24T16:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2017-05-24T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2024-08-05T17:02:43.380Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.1"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2017-05-24 16:29:00","lastModifiedDate":"2025-04-20 01:37:25","problem_types":["CWE-338","n/a","CWE-338 CWE-338 Use of Cryptographically Weak Pseudo-Random Number Generator (PRNG)"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}],"cvssMetricV30":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.0","vectorString":"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}],"cvssMetricV2":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"2.0","vectorString":"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N","baseScore":5,"accessVector":"NETWORK","accessComplexity":"LOW","authentication":"NONE","confidentialityImpact":"PARTIAL","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","exploitabilityScore":10,"impactScore":2.9,"acInsufInfo":false,"obtainAllPrivilege":false,"obtainUserPrivilege":false,"obtainOtherPrivilege":false,"userInteractionRequired":false}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:bitcoin:bitcoin:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"E03CE589-44AF-46D4-971C-E780C84F91BE"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"9230","Ordinal":"1","Title":"CVE-2017-9230","CVE":"CVE-2017-9230","Year":"2017"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"9230","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"The Bitcoin Proof-of-Work algorithm does not consider a certain attack methodology related to 80-byte block headers with a variety of initial 64-byte chunks followed by the same 16-byte chunk, multiple candidate root values ending with the same 4 bytes, and calculations involving sqrt numbers. This violates the security assumptions of (1) the choice of input, outside of the dedicated nonce area, fed into the Proof-of-Work function should not change its difficulty to evaluate and (2) every Proof-of-Work function execution should be independent. NOTE: a number of persons feel that this methodology is a benign mining optimization, not a vulnerability","Type":"Description","Title":"CVE-2017-9230"},{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"9230","Ordinal":"2","NoteData":"2017-05-24","Type":"Other","Title":"Published"},{"CveYear":"2017","CveId":"9230","Ordinal":"3","NoteData":"2018-06-13","Type":"Other","Title":"Modified"}]}}}