{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T12:55:00+00:00","cve":"CVE-2021-4226","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2021-4226","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2021-4226.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4226","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-4226"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2021-4226","description":"RSFirewall tries to identify the original IP address by looking at different HTTP headers. A bypass is possible due to the way it is implemented.","state":"PUBLIC","assigner":"contact@wpscan.com","published_at":"2022-12-15 19:15:00","updated_at":"2023-11-07 03:40:00"},"problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"references":[{"url":"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c0ed80c8-ebbf-4ed9-b02f-31660097c352","name":"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c0ed80c8-ebbf-4ed9-b02f-31660097c352","refsource":"MISC","tags":[],"title":"RSFirewall < 1.1.25 - IP Block Bypass WordPress Security Vulnerability","mime":"text/html","httpstatus":"403","archivestatus":"200"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-4226","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-4226","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"4226","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"rsjoomla","cpe5":"rsfirewall\\!","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"wordpress","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"data_version":"4.0","data_type":"CVE","data_format":"MITRE","CVE_data_meta":{"ID":"CVE-2021-4226","ASSIGNER":"contact@wpscan.com","STATE":"PUBLIC"},"description":{"description_data":[{"lang":"eng","value":"RSFirewall tries to identify the original IP address by looking at different HTTP headers. A bypass is possible due to the way it is implemented."}]},"problemtype":{"problemtype_data":[{"description":[{"lang":"eng","value":"CWE-639 Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key"}]}]},"affects":{"vendor":{"vendor_data":[{"vendor_name":"Unknown","product":{"product_data":[{"product_name":"RSFirewall!","version":{"version_data":[{"version_value":"0","version_affected":"="}]}}]}}]}},"references":{"reference_data":[{"url":"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c0ed80c8-ebbf-4ed9-b02f-31660097c352","refsource":"MISC","name":"https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/c0ed80c8-ebbf-4ed9-b02f-31660097c352"}]},"generator":{"engine":"WPScan CVE Generator"},"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"credits":[{"lang":"en","value":"Daniel Ruf"}]},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2022-12-15 19:15:00","lastModifiedDate":"2023-11-07 03:40:00","problem_types":[],"metrics":{"baseMetricV3":{"cvssV3":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":9.8,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":5.9}},"configurations":{"CVE_data_version":"4.0","nodes":[{"operator":"OR","children":[],"cpe_match":[{"vulnerable":true,"cpe23Uri":"cpe:2.3:a:rsjoomla:rsfirewall\\!:*:*:*:*:*:wordpress:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"1.1.25","cpe_name":[]}]}]}},"legacy_mitre":{"record":null,"notes":[]}}}