{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-10-15T12:26:18+00:00","cve":"CVE-2021-47094","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2021-47094","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2021-47094.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47094","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47094"},"summary":{"title":"KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding\n\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator.  Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\n\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.\n\nSprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\n\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways.  If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n  RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n   kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n   kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n   __fput+0x82/0x240\n   task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n   do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n   ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n   do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n   get_signal+0x155/0x850\n   arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n   do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list.  This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n  RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n   kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n   mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n   kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n   kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n   kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n   kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n   kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n   __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n   task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n   do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n   do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n   get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n   arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n   do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\"KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\") moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry.  But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\n\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \"retry\" label.  The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\n\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"Linux","published_at":"2024-03-04 18:15:07","updated_at":"2026-08-04 10:16:45"},"problem_types":["NVD-CWE-noinfo","CWE-noinfo Not enough information"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"ADP","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.1","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"LOCAL","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":7.1,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","type":"Secondary","score":"7.8","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":7.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","score":"7.1","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.1,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.8","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"baseScore":7.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-47094","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-47094","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected faaf05b00aecdb347ffd1d763d024394ec0329f8 d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected faaf05b00aecdb347ffd1d763d024394ec0329f8 3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 5.10","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 5.10 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 5.15.12 5.15.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 5.16 * original_commit_for_fix","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"5.16","cpe7":"rc1","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"5.16","cpe7":"rc2","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"5.16","cpe7":"rc3","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"5.16","cpe7":"rc4","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"5.16","cpe7":"rc5","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"5.16","cpe7":"rc6","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2021","cve_id":"47094","cve":"CVE-2021-47094","epss":"0.002170000","percentile":"0.121340000","score_date":"2026-08-05","updated_at":"2026-08-06 00:00:38"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"LOCAL","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":7.1,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}},{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2021-47094","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2024-03-06T15:25:43.452334Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"CWE-noinfo Not enough information","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-11-07T17:31:11.450Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"},{"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-08-04T05:24:39.844Z","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE"},"references":[{"tags":["x_transferred"],"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c"},{"tags":["x_transferred"],"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c"}],"title":"CVE Program Container"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c","arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h","arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"lessThan":"d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c","status":"affected","version":"faaf05b00aecdb347ffd1d763d024394ec0329f8","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c","status":"affected","version":"faaf05b00aecdb347ffd1d763d024394ec0329f8","versionType":"git"}]},{"defaultStatus":"affected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.c","arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h","arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"5.10"},{"lessThan":"5.10","status":"unaffected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"5.15.*","status":"unaffected","version":"5.15.12","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"5.16","versionType":"original_commit_for_fix"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"5.15.12","versionStartIncluding":"5.10","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"5.16","versionStartIncluding":"5.10","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding\n\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator.  Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\n\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.\n\nSprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\n\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways.  If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n  RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n   kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n   kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n   __fput+0x82/0x240\n   task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n   do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n   ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n   do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n   get_signal+0x155/0x850\n   arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n   do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list.  This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n  RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n   kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n   mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n   kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n   kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n   kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n   kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n   kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n   __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n   task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n   do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n   do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n   get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n   arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n   do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\"KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\") moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry.  But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\n\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \"retry\" label.  The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\n\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---"}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"baseScore":7.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-04T08:58:41.589Z","orgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","shortName":"Linux"},"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d884eefd75cc54887bc2e9e724207443525dfb2c"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3a0f64de479cae75effb630a2e0a237ca0d0623c"}],"title":"KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding","x_generator":{"engine":"bippy-1.2.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","assignerShortName":"Linux","cveId":"CVE-2021-47094","datePublished":"2024-03-04T18:10:45.240Z","dateReserved":"2024-02-29T22:33:44.300Z","dateUpdated":"2026-08-04T08:58:41.589Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2024-03-04 18:15:07","lastModifiedDate":"2026-08-04 10:16:45","problem_types":["NVD-CWE-noinfo","CWE-noinfo Not enough information"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":7.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":5.9},{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.1,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":5.2}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2024-03-06T15:25:43.452334Z","id":"CVE-2021-47094","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"5.10","versionEndExcluding":"5.15.12","matchCriteriaId":"DA092E66-EAB8-40F2-9727-31C32749AE15"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.16:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"357AA433-37E8-4323-BFB2-3038D6E4B414"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.16:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A73429BA-C2D9-4D0C-A75F-06A1CA8B3983"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.16:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F621B5E3-E99D-49E7-90B9-EC3B77C95383"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.16:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F7BFDCAA-1650-49AA-8462-407DD593F94F"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.16:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"6EC9882F-866D-4ACB-8FBC-213D8D8436C8"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:5.16:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"8A0915FE-A4AA-4C94-B783-CF29D81E7E54"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2021","CveId":"47094","Ordinal":"1","Title":"KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yieldi","CVE":"CVE-2021-47094","Year":"2021"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2021","CveId":"47094","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yielding\n\nAfter dropping mmu_lock in the TDP MMU, restart the iterator during\ntdp_iter_next() and do not advance the iterator.  Advancing the iterator\nresults in skipping the top-level SPTE and all its children, which is\nfatal if any of the skipped SPTEs were not visited before yielding.\n\nWhen zapping all SPTEs, i.e. when min_level == root_level, restarting the\niter and then invoking tdp_iter_next() is always fatal if the current gfn\nhas as a valid SPTE, as advancing the iterator results in try_step_side()\nskipping the current gfn, which wasn't visited before yielding.\n\nSprinkle WARNs on iter->yielded being true in various helpers that are\noften used in conjunction with yielding, and tag the helper with\n__must_check to reduce the probabily of improper usage.\n\nFailing to zap a top-level SPTE manifests in one of two ways.  If a valid\nSPTE is skipped by both kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() and kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(),\nthe shadow page will be leaked and KVM will WARN accordingly.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3509 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:46 [kvm]\n  RIP: 0010:kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu+0x3e/0x50 [kvm]\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x130/0x1b0 [kvm]\n   kvm_destroy_vm+0x162/0x2a0 [kvm]\n   kvm_vcpu_release+0x34/0x60 [kvm]\n   __fput+0x82/0x240\n   task_work_run+0x5c/0x90\n   do_exit+0x364/0xa10\n   ? futex_unqueue+0x38/0x60\n   do_group_exit+0x33/0xa0\n   get_signal+0x155/0x850\n   arch_do_signal_or_restart+0xed/0x750\n   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xc5/0x120\n   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n   do_syscall_64+0x48/0xc0\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nIf kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_all() skips a gfn/SPTE but that SPTE is then zapped by\nkvm_tdp_mmu_put_root(), KVM triggers a use-after-free in the form of\nmarking a struct page as dirty/accessed after it has been put back on the\nfree list.  This directly triggers a WARN due to encountering a page with\npage_count() == 0, but it can also lead to data corruption and additional\nerrors in the kernel.\n\n  WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1995658 at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:171\n  RIP: 0010:kvm_is_zone_device_pfn.part.0+0x9e/0xd0 [kvm]\n  Call Trace:\n   <TASK>\n   kvm_set_pfn_dirty+0x120/0x1d0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x92e/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   __handle_changed_spte+0x63c/0xca0 [kvm]\n   zap_gfn_range+0x549/0x620 [kvm]\n   kvm_tdp_mmu_put_root+0x1b6/0x270 [kvm]\n   mmu_free_root_page+0x219/0x2c0 [kvm]\n   kvm_mmu_free_roots+0x1b4/0x4e0 [kvm]\n   kvm_mmu_unload+0x1c/0xa0 [kvm]\n   kvm_arch_destroy_vm+0x1f2/0x5c0 [kvm]\n   kvm_put_kvm+0x3b1/0x8b0 [kvm]\n   kvm_vcpu_release+0x4e/0x70 [kvm]\n   __fput+0x1f7/0x8c0\n   task_work_run+0xf8/0x1a0\n   do_exit+0x97b/0x2230\n   do_group_exit+0xda/0x2a0\n   get_signal+0x3be/0x1e50\n   arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x244/0x17f0\n   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xcb/0x120\n   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x40\n   do_syscall_64+0x4d/0x90\n   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae\n\nNote, the underlying bug existed even before commit 1af4a96025b3 (\"KVM:\nx86/mmu: Yield in TDU MMU iter even if no SPTES changed\") moved calls to\ntdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() to the beginning of loops, as KVM could still\nincorrectly advance past a top-level entry when yielding on a lower-level\nentry.  But with respect to leaking shadow pages, the bug was introduced\nby yielding before processing the current gfn.\n\nAlternatively, tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() could simply fall through, or\ncallers could jump to their \"retry\" label.  The downside of that approach\nis that tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() _must_ be called before anything else\nin the loop, and there's no easy way to enfornce that requirement.\n\nIdeally, KVM would handling the cond_resched() fully within the iterator\nmacro (the code is actually quite clean) and avoid this entire class of\nbugs, but that is extremely difficult do wh\n---truncated---","Type":"Description","Title":"KVM: x86/mmu: Don't advance iterator after restart due to yieldi"}]}}}