{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T10:33:56+00:00","cve":"CVE-2024-41597","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2024-41597","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2024-41597.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41597","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41597"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2024-41597","description":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"mitre","published_at":"2024-07-19 20:15:08","updated_at":"2026-07-09 14:16:25"},"problem_types":["CWE-352","n/a","CWE-352 CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"ADP","type":"DECLARED","score":"4.2","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":4.2,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"REQUIRED","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","score":"4.2","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","baseScore":4.2,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"REQUIRED","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://gist.github.com/DefensiumDevelopers/608be4d10b016dce0566925368a8b08c#file-cve-2024-41597-md","name":"https://gist.github.com/DefensiumDevelopers/608be4d10b016dce0566925368a8b08c#file-cve-2024-41597-md","refsource":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","tags":["Exploit","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-41597","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-41597","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"n/a","version":"affected n/a","platforms":[]},{"source":"ADP","vendor":"processwire","product":"processwire","version":"affected 3.0.229","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2024","cve_id":"41597","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"processwire","cpe5":"processwire","cpe6":"3.0.229","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2024","cve_id":"41597","cve":"CVE-2024-41597","epss":"0.002110000","percentile":"0.112870000","score_date":"2026-07-13","updated_at":"2026-07-14 00:13:16"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"affected":[{"cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:processwire:processwire:3.0.229:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unknown","product":"processwire","vendor":"processwire","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"3.0.229"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":4.2,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"REQUIRED","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"}},{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2024-41597","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2024-07-24T17:54:10.979881Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-352","description":"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-07-24T17:56:27.366Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"},{"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2024-08-02T04:46:51.969Z","orgId":"af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108","shortName":"CVE"},"references":[{"tags":["x_transferred"],"url":"https://gist.github.com/DefensiumDevelopers/608be4d10b016dce0566925368a8b08c#file-cve-2024-41597-md"}],"title":"CVE Program Container"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"n/a","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"n/a"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review."}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"description":"n/a","lang":"en","type":"text"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-09T12:42:26.873Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","shortName":"mitre"},"references":[{"url":"https://gist.github.com/DefensiumDevelopers/608be4d10b016dce0566925368a8b08c#file-cve-2024-41597-md"}],"tags":["disputed"]}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","assignerShortName":"mitre","cveId":"CVE-2024-41597","datePublished":"2024-07-19T00:00:00.000Z","dateReserved":"2024-07-18T00:00:00.000Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-09T12:42:26.873Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2024-07-19 20:15:08","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-09 14:16:25","problem_types":["CWE-352","n/a","CWE-352 CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","baseScore":4.2,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"REQUIRED","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":1.6,"impactScore":2.5}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2024-07-24T17:54:10.979881Z","id":"CVE-2024-41597","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:processwire:processwire:3.0.229:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"DA6F3D4C-8845-44FF-A021-F202C57F38CF"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2024","CveId":"41597","Ordinal":"1","Title":"CVE-2024-41597","CVE":"CVE-2024-41597","Year":"2024"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2024","CveId":"41597","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in ProcessWire v.3.0.229 allows a remote attacker to insert a comment. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because the product intentionally accepts anonymous, unauthenticated comments and thus there are fewer situations in which CSRF would be a useful attack technique. Also, the submitted comments are, by default, held for moderator review.","Type":"Description","Title":"CVE-2024-41597"}]}}}