{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-04-23T00:41:49+00:00","cve":"CVE-2025-14777","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2025-14777","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2025-14777.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14777","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14777"},"summary":{"title":"Keycloak: keycloak idor in realm client creating/deleting","description":"A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"redhat","published_at":"2025-12-16 05:16:11","updated_at":"2026-04-02 14:16:24"},"problem_types":["CWE-289","CWE-289 Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"secalert@redhat.com","type":"Secondary","score":"6","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"HIGH","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"LOW"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"6","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"LOW","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"HIGH","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6478","name":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6478","refsource":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2422596","name":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2422596","refsource":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14777","name":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14777","refsource":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6477","name":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6477","refsource":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-14777","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-14777","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4","version":"unaffected 26.4-14 * rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4","version":"unaffected 26.4.11-1 * rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4","version":"unaffected 26.4-14 * rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.11","version":"","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[{"source":"CNA","time":"2025-12-16T04:55:24.347Z","lang":"en","value":"Reported to Red Hat."},{"source":"CNA","time":"2025-12-16T04:57:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Made public."}],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.","time":"","lang":"en"}],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Red Hat would like to thank Joshua Rogers for reporting this issue.","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2025","cve_id":"14777","cve":"CVE-2025-14777","epss":"0.000370000","percentile":"0.110600000","score_date":"2026-04-07","updated_at":"2026-04-08 00:03:40"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2025-14777","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2025-12-16T19:07:22.089575Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2025-12-16T19:09:38.229Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"collectionURL":"https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"keycloak-rhel9-operator-container","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4","vendor":"Red Hat","versions":[{"lessThan":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"26.4-14","versionType":"rpm"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"rhbk/keycloak-operator-bundle","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4","vendor":"Red Hat","versions":[{"lessThan":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"26.4.11-1","versionType":"rpm"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://catalog.redhat.com/software/containers/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"rhbk/keycloak-rhel9","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4","vendor":"Red Hat","versions":[{"lessThan":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"26.4-14","versionType":"rpm"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:build_keycloak:26.4::el9"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","packageName":"rhbk/keycloak-rhel9-operator","product":"Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.4.11","vendor":"Red Hat"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","value":"Red Hat would like to thank Joshua Rogers for reporting this issue."}],"datePublic":"2025-12-16T04:57:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID."}],"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"namespace":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/","value":"Moderate"},"type":"Red Hat severity rating"}},{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"LOW","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"HIGH","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS"}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-289","description":"Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-04-02T13:58:45.895Z","orgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","shortName":"redhat"},"references":[{"name":"RHSA-2026:6477","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6477"},{"name":"RHSA-2026:6478","tags":["vendor-advisory","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:6478"},{"tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14777"},{"name":"RHBZ#2422596","tags":["issue-tracking","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2422596"}],"timeline":[{"lang":"en","time":"2025-12-16T04:55:24.347Z","value":"Reported to Red Hat."},{"lang":"en","time":"2025-12-16T04:57:00.000Z","value":"Made public."}],"title":"Keycloak: keycloak idor in realm client creating/deleting","workarounds":[{"lang":"en","value":"Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability."}],"x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"},"x_redhatCweChain":"CWE-289: Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","assignerShortName":"redhat","cveId":"CVE-2025-14777","datePublished":"2025-12-16T05:02:42.106Z","dateReserved":"2025-12-16T04:56:14.486Z","dateUpdated":"2026-04-02T13:58:45.895Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2025-12-16 05:16:11","lastModifiedDate":"2026-04-02 14:16:24","problem_types":["CWE-289","CWE-289 Authentication Bypass by Alternate Name"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"secalert@redhat.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"HIGH","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"LOW"},"exploitabilityScore":1.2,"impactScore":4.7}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2025","CveId":"14777","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Keycloak: keycloak idor in realm client creating/deleting","CVE":"CVE-2025-14777","Year":"2025"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2025","CveId":"14777","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"A flaw was found in Keycloak. An IDOR (Broken Access Control) vulnerability exists in the admin API endpoints for authorization resource management, specifically in ResourceSetService and PermissionTicketService. The system checks authorization against the resourceServer (client) ID provided in the API request, but the backend database lookup and modification operations (findById, delete) only use the resourceId. This mismatch allows an authenticated attacker with fine-grained admin permissions for one client (e.g., Client A) to delete or update resources belonging to another client (Client B) within the same realm by supplying a valid resource ID.","Type":"Description","Title":"Keycloak: keycloak idor in realm client creating/deleting"}]}}}