{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-08-02T15:43:31+00:00","cve":"CVE-2025-21809","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2025-21809","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2025-21809.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21809"},"summary":{"title":"rxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback\n\nIn its address list, afs now retains pointers to and refs on one or more\nrxrpc_peer objects.  The address list is freed under RCU and at this time,\nit puts the refs on those peers.\n\nNow, when an rxrpc_peer object runs out of refs, it gets removed from the\npeer hash table and, for that, rxrpc has to take a spinlock.  However, it\nis now being called from afs's RCU cleanup, which takes place in BH\ncontext - but it is just taking an ordinary spinlock.\n\nThe put may also be called from non-BH context, and so there exists the\npossibility of deadlock if the BH-based RCU cleanup happens whilst the hash\nspinlock is held.  This led to the attached lockdep complaint.\n\nFix this by changing spinlocks of rxnet->peer_hash_lock back to\nBH-disabling locks.\n\n    ================================\n    WARNING: inconsistent lock state\n    6.13.0-rc5-build2+ #1223 Tainted: G            E\n    --------------------------------\n    inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.\n    swapper/1/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:\n    ffff88810babe228 (&rxnet->peer_hash_lock){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: rxrpc_put_peer+0xcb/0x180\n    {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:\n      mark_usage+0x164/0x180\n      __lock_acquire+0x544/0x990\n      lock_acquire.part.0+0x103/0x280\n      _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n      rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x144/0x440\n      process_one_work+0x486/0x7c0\n      process_scheduled_works+0x73/0x90\n      worker_thread+0x1c8/0x2a0\n      kthread+0x19b/0x1b0\n      ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40\n      ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n    irq event stamp: 972402\n    hardirqs last  enabled at (972402): [<ffffffff8244360e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2e/0x50\n    hardirqs last disabled at (972401): [<ffffffff82443328>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x18/0x60\n    softirqs last  enabled at (972300): [<ffffffff810ffbbe>] handle_softirqs+0x3ee/0x430\n    softirqs last disabled at (972313): [<ffffffff810ffc54>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x44/0x110\n\n    other info that might help us debug this:\n     Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n           CPU0\n           ----\n      lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);\n      <Interrupt>\n        lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);\n\n     *** DEADLOCK ***\n    1 lock held by swapper/1/0:\n     #0: ffffffff83576be0 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x7/0x30\n\n    stack backtrace:\n    CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G            E      6.13.0-rc5-build2+ #1223\n    Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE\n    Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014\n    Call Trace:\n     <IRQ>\n     dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x80\n     print_usage_bug.part.0+0x227/0x240\n     valid_state+0x53/0x70\n     mark_lock_irq+0xa5/0x2f0\n     mark_lock+0xf7/0x170\n     mark_usage+0xe1/0x180\n     __lock_acquire+0x544/0x990\n     lock_acquire.part.0+0x103/0x280\n     _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n     rxrpc_put_peer+0xcb/0x180\n     afs_free_addrlist+0x46/0x90 [kafs]\n     rcu_do_batch+0x2d2/0x640\n     rcu_core+0x2f7/0x350\n     handle_softirqs+0x1ee/0x430\n     __irq_exit_rcu+0x44/0x110\n     irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x30\n     sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7f/0xa0\n     </IRQ>","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"Linux","published_at":"2025-02-27 20:16:03","updated_at":"2026-07-30 06:21:38"},"problem_types":["CWE-667","CWE-667 CWE-667 Improper Locking"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5.5","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"ADP","type":"DECLARED","score":"5.5","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"LOCAL","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","type":"Secondary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","score":"5.5","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e77dd41689637ac4e1b8fe0f27541f373640855","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e77dd41689637ac4e1b8fe0f27541f373640855","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10ba5a3d57af20e494e0d979d1894260989235dd","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10ba5a3d57af20e494e0d979d1894260989235dd","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79d458c13056559d49b5e41fbc4b6890e68cf65b","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79d458c13056559d49b5e41fbc4b6890e68cf65b","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-21809","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21809","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 72904d7b9bfbf2dd146254edea93958bc35bbbfe 10ba5a3d57af20e494e0d979d1894260989235dd git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 72904d7b9bfbf2dd146254edea93958bc35bbbfe 0e77dd41689637ac4e1b8fe0f27541f373640855 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 72904d7b9bfbf2dd146254edea93958bc35bbbfe 79d458c13056559d49b5e41fbc4b6890e68cf65b git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 056fc740be000d39a7dba700a935f3bbfbc664e6 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 6.7.3 6.8 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 6.8","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.8 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.12.13 6.12.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.13.2 6.13.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.14 * original_commit_for_fix","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2025","cve_id":"21809","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"LOCAL","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}},{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2025-21809","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2025-10-01T19:28:41.037357Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-667","description":"CWE-667 Improper Locking","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2025-10-01T19:36:38.646Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["net/rxrpc/peer_event.c","net/rxrpc/peer_object.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"lessThan":"10ba5a3d57af20e494e0d979d1894260989235dd","status":"affected","version":"72904d7b9bfbf2dd146254edea93958bc35bbbfe","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"0e77dd41689637ac4e1b8fe0f27541f373640855","status":"affected","version":"72904d7b9bfbf2dd146254edea93958bc35bbbfe","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"79d458c13056559d49b5e41fbc4b6890e68cf65b","status":"affected","version":"72904d7b9bfbf2dd146254edea93958bc35bbbfe","versionType":"git"},{"status":"affected","version":"056fc740be000d39a7dba700a935f3bbfbc664e6","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"6.8","status":"affected","version":"6.7.3","versionType":"semver"}]},{"defaultStatus":"affected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["net/rxrpc/peer_event.c","net/rxrpc/peer_object.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"6.8"},{"lessThan":"6.8","status":"unaffected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"6.12.*","status":"unaffected","version":"6.12.13","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"6.13.*","status":"unaffected","version":"6.13.2","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"6.14","versionType":"original_commit_for_fix"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.12.13","versionStartIncluding":"6.8","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.13.2","versionStartIncluding":"6.8","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.14","versionStartIncluding":"6.8","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"6.7.3","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback\n\nIn its address list, afs now retains pointers to and refs on one or more\nrxrpc_peer objects.  The address list is freed under RCU and at this time,\nit puts the refs on those peers.\n\nNow, when an rxrpc_peer object runs out of refs, it gets removed from the\npeer hash table and, for that, rxrpc has to take a spinlock.  However, it\nis now being called from afs's RCU cleanup, which takes place in BH\ncontext - but it is just taking an ordinary spinlock.\n\nThe put may also be called from non-BH context, and so there exists the\npossibility of deadlock if the BH-based RCU cleanup happens whilst the hash\nspinlock is held.  This led to the attached lockdep complaint.\n\nFix this by changing spinlocks of rxnet->peer_hash_lock back to\nBH-disabling locks.\n\n    ================================\n    WARNING: inconsistent lock state\n    6.13.0-rc5-build2+ #1223 Tainted: G            E\n    --------------------------------\n    inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.\n    swapper/1/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:\n    ffff88810babe228 (&rxnet->peer_hash_lock){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: rxrpc_put_peer+0xcb/0x180\n    {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:\n      mark_usage+0x164/0x180\n      __lock_acquire+0x544/0x990\n      lock_acquire.part.0+0x103/0x280\n      _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n      rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x144/0x440\n      process_one_work+0x486/0x7c0\n      process_scheduled_works+0x73/0x90\n      worker_thread+0x1c8/0x2a0\n      kthread+0x19b/0x1b0\n      ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40\n      ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n    irq event stamp: 972402\n    hardirqs last  enabled at (972402): [<ffffffff8244360e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2e/0x50\n    hardirqs last disabled at (972401): [<ffffffff82443328>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x18/0x60\n    softirqs last  enabled at (972300): [<ffffffff810ffbbe>] handle_softirqs+0x3ee/0x430\n    softirqs last disabled at (972313): [<ffffffff810ffc54>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x44/0x110\n\n    other info that might help us debug this:\n     Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n           CPU0\n           ----\n      lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);\n      <Interrupt>\n        lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);\n\n     *** DEADLOCK ***\n    1 lock held by swapper/1/0:\n     #0: ffffffff83576be0 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x7/0x30\n\n    stack backtrace:\n    CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G            E      6.13.0-rc5-build2+ #1223\n    Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE\n    Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014\n    Call Trace:\n     <IRQ>\n     dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x80\n     print_usage_bug.part.0+0x227/0x240\n     valid_state+0x53/0x70\n     mark_lock_irq+0xa5/0x2f0\n     mark_lock+0xf7/0x170\n     mark_usage+0xe1/0x180\n     __lock_acquire+0x544/0x990\n     lock_acquire.part.0+0x103/0x280\n     _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n     rxrpc_put_peer+0xcb/0x180\n     afs_free_addrlist+0x46/0x90 [kafs]\n     rcu_do_batch+0x2d2/0x640\n     rcu_core+0x2f7/0x350\n     handle_softirqs+0x1ee/0x430\n     __irq_exit_rcu+0x44/0x110\n     irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x30\n     sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7f/0xa0\n     </IRQ>"}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-30T05:45:56.962Z","orgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","shortName":"Linux"},"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/10ba5a3d57af20e494e0d979d1894260989235dd"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e77dd41689637ac4e1b8fe0f27541f373640855"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79d458c13056559d49b5e41fbc4b6890e68cf65b"}],"title":"rxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback","x_generator":{"engine":"bippy-1.2.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","assignerShortName":"Linux","cveId":"CVE-2025-21809","datePublished":"2025-02-27T20:01:00.969Z","dateReserved":"2024-12-29T08:45:45.772Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-30T05:45:56.962Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2025-02-27 20:16:03","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-30 06:21:38","problem_types":["CWE-667","CWE-667 CWE-667 Improper Locking"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6},{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":3.6},{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":3.6}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2025-10-01T19:28:41.037357Z","id":"CVE-2025-21809","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"6.7.3","versionEndExcluding":"6.12.13","matchCriteriaId":"3E9F5C4F-14D8-4DCE-A228-7F073932D0D0"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"6.13","versionEndExcluding":"6.13.2","matchCriteriaId":"6D4116B1-1BFD-4F23-BA84-169CC05FC5A3"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2025","CveId":"21809","Ordinal":"1","Title":"rxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback","CVE":"CVE-2025-21809","Year":"2025"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2025","CveId":"21809","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nrxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback\n\nIn its address list, afs now retains pointers to and refs on one or more\nrxrpc_peer objects.  The address list is freed under RCU and at this time,\nit puts the refs on those peers.\n\nNow, when an rxrpc_peer object runs out of refs, it gets removed from the\npeer hash table and, for that, rxrpc has to take a spinlock.  However, it\nis now being called from afs's RCU cleanup, which takes place in BH\ncontext - but it is just taking an ordinary spinlock.\n\nThe put may also be called from non-BH context, and so there exists the\npossibility of deadlock if the BH-based RCU cleanup happens whilst the hash\nspinlock is held.  This led to the attached lockdep complaint.\n\nFix this by changing spinlocks of rxnet->peer_hash_lock back to\nBH-disabling locks.\n\n    ================================\n    WARNING: inconsistent lock state\n    6.13.0-rc5-build2+ #1223 Tainted: G            E\n    --------------------------------\n    inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.\n    swapper/1/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:\n    ffff88810babe228 (&rxnet->peer_hash_lock){+.?.}-{3:3}, at: rxrpc_put_peer+0xcb/0x180\n    {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:\n      mark_usage+0x164/0x180\n      __lock_acquire+0x544/0x990\n      lock_acquire.part.0+0x103/0x280\n      _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n      rxrpc_peer_keepalive_worker+0x144/0x440\n      process_one_work+0x486/0x7c0\n      process_scheduled_works+0x73/0x90\n      worker_thread+0x1c8/0x2a0\n      kthread+0x19b/0x1b0\n      ret_from_fork+0x24/0x40\n      ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30\n    irq event stamp: 972402\n    hardirqs last  enabled at (972402): [<ffffffff8244360e>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2e/0x50\n    hardirqs last disabled at (972401): [<ffffffff82443328>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x18/0x60\n    softirqs last  enabled at (972300): [<ffffffff810ffbbe>] handle_softirqs+0x3ee/0x430\n    softirqs last disabled at (972313): [<ffffffff810ffc54>] __irq_exit_rcu+0x44/0x110\n\n    other info that might help us debug this:\n     Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n           CPU0\n           ----\n      lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);\n      <Interrupt>\n        lock(&rxnet->peer_hash_lock);\n\n     *** DEADLOCK ***\n    1 lock held by swapper/1/0:\n     #0: ffffffff83576be0 (rcu_callback){....}-{0:0}, at: rcu_lock_acquire+0x7/0x30\n\n    stack backtrace:\n    CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G            E      6.13.0-rc5-build2+ #1223\n    Tainted: [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE\n    Hardware name: ASUS All Series/H97-PLUS, BIOS 2306 10/09/2014\n    Call Trace:\n     <IRQ>\n     dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x80\n     print_usage_bug.part.0+0x227/0x240\n     valid_state+0x53/0x70\n     mark_lock_irq+0xa5/0x2f0\n     mark_lock+0xf7/0x170\n     mark_usage+0xe1/0x180\n     __lock_acquire+0x544/0x990\n     lock_acquire.part.0+0x103/0x280\n     _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40\n     rxrpc_put_peer+0xcb/0x180\n     afs_free_addrlist+0x46/0x90 [kafs]\n     rcu_do_batch+0x2d2/0x640\n     rcu_core+0x2f7/0x350\n     handle_softirqs+0x1ee/0x430\n     __irq_exit_rcu+0x44/0x110\n     irq_exit_rcu+0xa/0x30\n     sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x7f/0xa0\n     </IRQ>","Type":"Description","Title":"rxrpc, afs: Fix peer hash locking vs RCU callback"}]}}}