{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-11-08T17:49:23+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-112907","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-112907","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-112907.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-112907","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-112907"},"summary":{"title":"filelock: On Windows an oplock on a soft lock's marker holds SoftFileLock.acquire() past its timeout and blocks the stale break","description":"filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, soft lock classes on Windows read an existing marker with _read_lock_file and remove a stale marker through break_lock_file using pathname operations that wait for an oplock break. Another local account with read access to an unheld marker can keep a Level 1 or batch oplock unanswered, causing SoftFileLock.acquire and related async or fallback locks to wait beyond timeout, blocking=False, and cancel_check. A stale marker under the oplock cannot be broken, but mutual exclusion remains intact and no file other than the marker is accessed. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-11-05 22:17:46","updated_at":"2026-11-06 21:40:43"},"problem_types":["CWE-667","CWE-667 CWE-667: Improper Locking"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"2.5","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","baseScore":2.5,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"LOW"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"2.5","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"LOCAL","availabilityImpact":"LOW","baseScore":2.5,"baseSeverity":"LOW","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92","name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/4.2.1","name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/4.2.1","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/e1e825b1992f69fb6b346dc395d5ae4893536c0a","name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/e1e825b1992f69fb6b346dc395d5ae4893536c0a","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/97d694a9a3ee1721d6c79a480174dfd9b060a080","name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/97d694a9a3ee1721d6c79a480174dfd9b060a080","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/835","name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/835","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-112907","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-112907","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"tox-dev","product":"filelock","version":"affected >= 3.22.0, < 4.2.1","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"112907","cve":"CVE-2026-112907","epss":"0.001040000","percentile":"0.010300000","score_date":"2026-11-07","updated_at":"2026-11-08 00:06:14"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"filelock","vendor":"tox-dev","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":">= 3.22.0, < 4.2.1"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, soft lock classes on Windows read an existing marker with _read_lock_file and remove a stale marker through break_lock_file using pathname operations that wait for an oplock break. Another local account with read access to an unheld marker can keep a Level 1 or batch oplock unanswered, causing SoftFileLock.acquire and related async or fallback locks to wait beyond timeout, blocking=False, and cancel_check. A stale marker under the oplock cannot be broken, but mutual exclusion remains intact and no file other than the marker is accessed. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"LOCAL","availabilityImpact":"LOW","baseScore":2.5,"baseSeverity":"LOW","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-667","description":"CWE-667: Improper Locking","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-11-05T21:50:04.632Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92"},{"name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/835","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/pull/835"},{"name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/97d694a9a3ee1721d6c79a480174dfd9b060a080","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/97d694a9a3ee1721d6c79a480174dfd9b060a080"},{"name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/e1e825b1992f69fb6b346dc395d5ae4893536c0a","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/commit/e1e825b1992f69fb6b346dc395d5ae4893536c0a"},{"name":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/4.2.1","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/releases/tag/4.2.1"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-567q-5qvw-pf92","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"filelock: On Windows an oplock on a soft lock's marker holds SoftFileLock.acquire() past its timeout and blocks the stale break"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-112907","datePublished":"2026-11-05T21:50:04.632Z","dateReserved":"2026-10-19T20:16:09.857Z","dateUpdated":"2026-11-05T21:50:04.632Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-11-05 22:17:46","lastModifiedDate":"2026-11-06 21:40:43","problem_types":["CWE-667","CWE-667 CWE-667: Improper Locking"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L","baseScore":2.5,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"LOW"},"exploitabilityScore":1,"impactScore":1.4}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"112907","Ordinal":"1","Title":"filelock: On Windows an oplock on a soft lock's marker holds Sof","CVE":"CVE-2026-112907","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"112907","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"filelock is a platform-independent file lock for Python. From 3.22.0 until 4.2.1, soft lock classes on Windows read an existing marker with _read_lock_file and remove a stale marker through break_lock_file using pathname operations that wait for an oplock break. Another local account with read access to an unheld marker can keep a Level 1 or batch oplock unanswered, causing SoftFileLock.acquire and related async or fallback locks to wait beyond timeout, blocking=False, and cancel_check. A stale marker under the oplock cannot be broken, but mutual exclusion remains intact and no file other than the marker is accessed. This issue is fixed in version 4.2.1.","Type":"Description","Title":"filelock: On Windows an oplock on a soft lock's marker holds Sof"}]}}}