{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-10-22T04:02:25+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-114719","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-114719","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-114719.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-114719","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-114719"},"summary":{"title":"CVE-2026-114719","description":"Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action of the markasjunk plugin. The plugin read the _uid parameter from POST data but passed it to rcmail::get_uids() without constraining the input mode, so values re-read inside that helper could be taken from the query string and the action carried out without a valid CSRF token. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action”, which passes rcube_utils::INPUT_POST explicitly.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"mitre","published_at":"2026-10-22 02:16:59","updated_at":"2026-10-22 02:16:59"},"problem_types":["CWE-352","CWE-352 CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"cve@mitre.org","type":"Secondary","score":"3.7","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"3.7","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/15b0dc0d6e5712310c8f663577361bf8132a7f81","name":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/15b0dc0d6e5712310c8f663577361bf8132a7f81","refsource":"cve@mitre.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/6ea2bbe356099c9da98eabcfeafd8d6aa2d67b3d","name":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/6ea2bbe356099c9da98eabcfeafd8d6aa2d67b3d","refsource":"cve@mitre.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://roundcube.net/news/2026/10/19/security-updates-1.6.20-and-1.7.5","name":"https://roundcube.net/news/2026/10/19/security-updates-1.6.20-and-1.7.5","refsource":"cve@mitre.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://bugs.debian.org/1151279","name":"https://bugs.debian.org/1151279","refsource":"cve@mitre.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.7.5","name":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.7.5","refsource":"cve@mitre.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.20","name":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.20","refsource":"cve@mitre.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-114719","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-114719","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Roundcube","product":"Webmail","version":"affected 1.6.0 1.6.20 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Roundcube","product":"Webmail","version":"affected 1.7.0 1.7.5 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Webmail","repo":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/","vendor":"Roundcube","versions":[{"lessThan":"1.6.20","status":"affected","version":"1.6.0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThan":"1.7.5","status":"affected","version":"1.7.0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:roundcube:webmail:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"1.6.20","versionStartIncluding":"1.6.0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:roundcube:webmail:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"1.7.5","versionStartIncluding":"1.7.0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action of the markasjunk plugin. The plugin read the _uid parameter from POST data but passed it to rcmail::get_uids() without constraining the input mode, so values re-read inside that helper could be taken from the query string and the action carried out without a valid CSRF token. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action”, which passes rcube_utils::INPUT_POST explicitly."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-352","description":"CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-10-22T01:28:45.516Z","orgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","shortName":"mitre"},"references":[{"tags":["issue-tracking","third-party-advisory"],"url":"https://bugs.debian.org/1151279"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/6ea2bbe356099c9da98eabcfeafd8d6aa2d67b3d"},{"tags":["vendor-advisory","release-notes"],"url":"https://roundcube.net/news/2026/10/19/security-updates-1.6.20-and-1.7.5"},{"tags":["release-notes","patch"],"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.7.5"},{"tags":["release-notes","patch"],"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/releases/tag/1.6.20"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/15b0dc0d6e5712310c8f663577361bf8132a7f81"}],"x_generator":{"engine":"CVE-Request-form 0.0.1"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"8254265b-2729-46b6-b9e3-3dfca2d5bfca","assignerShortName":"mitre","cveId":"CVE-2026-114719","datePublished":"2026-10-22T01:28:45.516Z","dateReserved":"2026-10-22T01:28:45.178Z","dateUpdated":"2026-10-22T01:28:45.516Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-10-22 02:16:59","lastModifiedDate":"2026-10-22 02:16:59","problem_types":["CWE-352","CWE-352 CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"cve@mitre.org","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":1.4}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"114719","Ordinal":"1","Title":"CVE-2026-114719","CVE":"CVE-2026-114719","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"114719","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action of the markasjunk plugin. The plugin read the _uid parameter from POST data but passed it to rcmail::get_uids() without constraining the input mode, so values re-read inside that helper could be taken from the query string and the action carried out without a valid CSRF token. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix CSRF validation bypass in the mark-as-junk action”, which passes rcube_utils::INPUT_POST explicitly.","Type":"Description","Title":"CVE-2026-114719"}]}}}