{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-11-03T19:49:25+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-118488","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-118488","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-118488.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-118488","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-118488"},"summary":{"title":"Heap exhaustion via unbounded simple string or bulk string allocation in Vert.x Redis client","description":"In Eclipse Vert.x versions [4.0.0, 4.5.35] or [5.0.0, 5.2.2], when a malicious server keeps sending bytes on an EOL-terminated line (not length-prefixed, for example a simple string [1]), we'll keep growing the buffer without bounds, eventually leading to an OOM. We need to have a configurable limit for EOL-terminated lines.\n\n\n\nIf a malicious server sends a specially crafted RESP response (for example a bulk string [2] with missing CRLF trailer), the parser enters an infinite loop where it keeps parsing the same buffer and pushing the same response to the caller, which may lead e.g. to an OOM if the consumer just buffers the responses. We must fix the parser to avoid this infinite looping.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"eclipse","published_at":"2026-11-03 15:17:24","updated_at":"2026-11-03 18:17:54"},"problem_types":["CWE-770","CWE-770 CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"emo@eclipse.org","type":"Secondary","score":"5.9","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"5.9","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/522","name":"https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/522","refsource":"emo@eclipse.org","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-redis-client/security/advisories/GHSA-7f58-g87w-gx7p","name":"https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-redis-client/security/advisories/GHSA-7f58-g87w-gx7p","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-118488","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-118488","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Eclipse Foundation","product":"Eclipse Vert.x","version":"affected 4.0.0 4.5.35 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Eclipse Foundation","product":"Eclipse Vert.x","version":"affected 5.0.0 5.2.2 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Ladislav Thon","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-118488","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-11-03T18:04:20.615626Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-770","description":"CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-11-03T18:04:57.987Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-redis-client/security/advisories/GHSA-7f58-g87w-gx7p"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Eclipse Vert.x","vendor":"Eclipse Foundation","versions":[{"lessThanOrEqual":"4.5.35","status":"affected","version":"4.0.0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"5.2.2","status":"affected","version":"5.0.0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Ladislav Thon"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"<p>In Eclipse Vert.x versions [4.0.0, 4.5.35] or [5.0.0, 5.2.2], when a malicious server keeps sending bytes on an EOL-terminated line (not length-prefixed, for example a simple string [1]), we'll keep growing the buffer without bounds, eventually leading to an OOM. We need to have a configurable limit for EOL-terminated lines.</p><p>If a malicious server sends a specially crafted RESP response (for example a bulk string [2] with missing CRLF trailer), the parser enters an infinite loop where it keeps parsing the same buffer and pushing the same response to the caller, which may lead e.g. to an OOM if the consumer just buffers the responses. We must fix the parser to avoid this infinite looping.</p>"}],"value":"In Eclipse Vert.x versions [4.0.0, 4.5.35] or [5.0.0, 5.2.2], when a malicious server keeps sending bytes on an EOL-terminated line (not length-prefixed, for example a simple string [1]), we'll keep growing the buffer without bounds, eventually leading to an OOM. We need to have a configurable limit for EOL-terminated lines.\n\n\n\nIf a malicious server sends a specially crafted RESP response (for example a bulk string [2] with missing CRLF trailer), the parser enters an infinite loop where it keeps parsing the same buffer and pushing the same response to the caller, which may lead e.g. to an OOM if the consumer just buffers the responses. We must fix the parser to avoid this infinite looping."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-11-03T15:13:17.354Z","orgId":"e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c","shortName":"eclipse"},"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-redis-client/security/advisories/GHSA-7f58-g87w-gx7p"},{"url":"https://gitlab.eclipse.org/security/cve-assignment/-/work_items/522"}],"source":{"discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"Heap exhaustion via unbounded simple string or bulk string allocation in Vert.x Redis client","x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 1.0.5"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"e51fbebd-6053-4e49-959f-1b94eeb69a2c","assignerShortName":"eclipse","cveId":"CVE-2026-118488","datePublished":"2026-11-03T15:13:17.354Z","dateReserved":"2026-10-28T11:32:50.242Z","dateUpdated":"2026-11-03T18:04:57.987Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-11-03 15:17:24","lastModifiedDate":"2026-11-03 18:17:54","problem_types":["CWE-770","CWE-770 CWE-770 Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"emo@eclipse.org","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":3.6}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-11-03T18:04:20.615626Z","id":"CVE-2026-118488","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"118488","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Heap exhaustion via unbounded simple string or bulk string alloc","CVE":"CVE-2026-118488","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"118488","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In Eclipse Vert.x versions [4.0.0, 4.5.35] or [5.0.0, 5.2.2], when a malicious server keeps sending bytes on an EOL-terminated line (not length-prefixed, for example a simple string [1]), we'll keep growing the buffer without bounds, eventually leading to an OOM. We need to have a configurable limit for EOL-terminated lines.\n\n\n\nIf a malicious server sends a specially crafted RESP response (for example a bulk string [2] with missing CRLF trailer), the parser enters an infinite loop where it keeps parsing the same buffer and pushing the same response to the caller, which may lead e.g. to an OOM if the consumer just buffers the responses. We must fix the parser to avoid this infinite looping.","Type":"Description","Title":"Heap exhaustion via unbounded simple string or bulk string alloc"}]}}}