{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-11T12:13:41+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-15041","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-15041","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-15041.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15041","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15041"},"summary":{"title":"389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: non-constant-time comparison in pbkdf2-sha256 password verification","description":"A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The PBKDF2-SHA256 password verification function uses standard memcmp() for comparing password hashes instead of a constant-time comparison function. A remote attacker could potentially use timing measurements of LDAP bind attempts to infer partial hash information, though practical exploitation is extremely difficult due to PBKDF2 computational overhead.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"redhat","published_at":"2026-07-08 11:16:26","updated_at":"2026-07-09 19:36:15"},"problem_types":["CWE-208","CWE-208 Observable Timing Discrepancy"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"secalert@redhat.com","type":"Secondary","score":"3.7","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"3.7","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2498022","name":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2498022","refsource":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":["Issue Tracking","Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-15041","name":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-15041","refsource":"secalert@redhat.com","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15041","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15041","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Directory Server 11","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Directory Server 12","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Directory Server 13","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8","version":"","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Red Hat","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9","version":"","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-07-08T09:55:42.287Z","lang":"en","value":"Reported to Red Hat."},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-07-08T09:58:21.463Z","lang":"en","value":"Made public."}],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"If possible, configure 389 Directory Server to use an alternative password storage scheme (e.g., SSHA512 or GOST-Yescrypt) which uses constant-time comparison.","time":"","lang":"en"}],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Red Hat would like to thank Andrew Rukin (Arenadata) for reporting this issue.","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"389_directory_server","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"directory_server","cpe6":"11.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"directory_server","cpe6":"12.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"directory_server","cpe6":"13.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"enterprise_linux","cpe6":"10.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"enterprise_linux","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"enterprise_linux","cpe6":"8.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"redhat","cpe5":"enterprise_linux","cpe6":"9.0","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15041","cve":"CVE-2026-15041","epss":"0.003000000","percentile":"0.218010000","score_date":"2026-07-10","updated_at":"2026-07-11 00:11:15"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-15041","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-07-08T13:44:08.886989Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-08T13:44:19.153Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:11"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"redhat-ds:11/389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Directory Server 11","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:12"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"redhat-ds:12/389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Directory Server 12","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/a:redhat:directory_server:13"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Directory Server 13","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:6"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","packageName":"389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"389-ds:1.4/389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8","vendor":"Red Hat"},{"collectionURL":"https://access.redhat.com/downloads/content/package-browser/","cpes":["cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9"],"defaultStatus":"affected","packageName":"389-ds-base","product":"Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9","vendor":"Red Hat"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","value":"Red Hat would like to thank Andrew Rukin (Arenadata) for reporting this issue."}],"datePublic":"2026-07-08T09:58:21.463Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The PBKDF2-SHA256 password verification function uses standard memcmp() for comparing password hashes instead of a constant-time comparison function. A remote attacker could potentially use timing measurements of LDAP bind attempts to infer partial hash information, though practical exploitation is extremely difficult due to PBKDF2 computational overhead."}],"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"namespace":"https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification/","value":"Low"},"type":"Red Hat severity rating"}},{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS"}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-208","description":"Observable Timing Discrepancy","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-08T11:06:57.873Z","orgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","shortName":"redhat"},"references":[{"tags":["vdb-entry","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-15041"},{"name":"RHBZ#2498022","tags":["issue-tracking","x_refsource_REDHAT"],"url":"https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2498022"}],"timeline":[{"lang":"en","time":"2026-07-08T09:55:42.287Z","value":"Reported to Red Hat."},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-07-08T09:58:21.463Z","value":"Made public."}],"title":"389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: non-constant-time comparison in pbkdf2-sha256 password verification","workarounds":[{"lang":"en","value":"If possible, configure 389 Directory Server to use an alternative password storage scheme (e.g., SSHA512 or GOST-Yescrypt) which uses constant-time comparison."}],"x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"},"x_redhatCweChain":"CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"53f830b8-0a3f-465b-8143-3b8a9948e749","assignerShortName":"redhat","cveId":"CVE-2026-15041","datePublished":"2026-07-08T10:15:30.480Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-08T10:00:02.126Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-08T13:44:19.153Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-07-08 11:16:26","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-09 19:36:15","problem_types":["CWE-208","CWE-208 Observable Timing Discrepancy"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"secalert@redhat.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":1.4}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-07-08T13:44:08.886989Z","id":"CVE-2026-15041","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"2A169F6D-88A5-4631-9D30-519350ACFE6E"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:12.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A3DAF61A-58A9-41A6-A4DC-64148055B0C1"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:redhat:directory_server:13.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"904002F4-762C-4CFF-88C4-8FC929774DF8"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:389_directory_server:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A861110D-0BBC-4052-BBFD-F718F6CD72C5"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"142AD0DD-4CF3-4D74-9442-459CE3347E3A"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F4CFF558-3C47-480D-A2F0-BABF26042943"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:9.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"7F6FB57C-2BC7-487C-96DD-132683AEB35D"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"D65C2163-CFC2-4ABB-8F4E-CB09CEBD006C"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"15041","Ordinal":"1","Title":"389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: non-constant-time comparison in pbkdf2","CVE":"CVE-2026-15041","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"15041","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. The PBKDF2-SHA256 password verification function uses standard memcmp() for comparing password hashes instead of a constant-time comparison function. A remote attacker could potentially use timing measurements of LDAP bind attempts to infer partial hash information, though practical exploitation is extremely difficult due to PBKDF2 computational overhead.","Type":"Description","Title":"389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: non-constant-time comparison in pbkdf2"}]}}}