{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-08-13T14:16:06+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-15144","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-15144","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-15144.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15144","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15144"},"summary":{"title":"@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 address rotation","description":"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"openjs","published_at":"2026-07-29 17:16:50","updated_at":"2026-08-05 15:33:13"},"problem_types":["CWE-307","CWE-770","CWE-307 CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts","CWE-770 CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","type":"Secondary","score":"7.3","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","baseScore":7.3,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"LOW"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"7.3","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","data":{"baseScore":7.3,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html","name":"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html","refsource":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v","name":"https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v","refsource":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","tags":["Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-15144","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-15144","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"@fastify/rate-limit","product":"@fastify/rate-limit","version":"affected 11.2.0 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"@fastify/rate-limit","product":"@fastify/rate-limit","version":"unaffected 11.2.0 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"0xShemesh","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"mcollina","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"climba03003","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"UlisesGascon","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15144","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"fastify","cpe5":"fastify\\/rate-limit","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"node.js","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"15144","cve":"CVE-2026-15144","epss":"0.002460000","percentile":"0.159150000","score_date":"2026-08-09","updated_at":"2026-08-10 00:07:38"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-15144","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-07-29T17:56:23.752502Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-29T17:56:31.392Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","packageURL":"pkg:npm/@fastify/rate-limit","product":"@fastify/rate-limit","vendor":"@fastify/rate-limit","versions":[{"lessThan":"11.2.0","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"},{"status":"unaffected","version":"11.2.0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"reporter","value":"0xShemesh"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation developer","value":"mcollina"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation reviewer","value":"climba03003"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation reviewer","value":"UlisesGascon"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option."}],"value":"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"baseScore":7.3,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-307","description":"CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-770","description":"CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-29T16:10:24.560Z","orgId":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","shortName":"openjs"},"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/fastify/fastify-rate-limit/security/advisories/GHSA-grpc-p53c-r64v"},{"url":"https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html"}],"title":"@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 address rotation","x_generator":{"engine":"cve-kit 1.0.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","assignerShortName":"openjs","cveId":"CVE-2026-15144","datePublished":"2026-07-29T16:10:24.560Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-08T17:27:38.479Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-29T17:56:31.392Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-07-29 17:16:50","lastModifiedDate":"2026-08-05 15:33:13","problem_types":["CWE-307","CWE-770","CWE-307 CWE-307: Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts","CWE-770 CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L","baseScore":7.3,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"LOW"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.4},{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":1.4}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-07-29T17:56:23.752502Z","id":"CVE-2026-15144","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:fastify:fastify\\/rate-limit:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"11.2.0","matchCriteriaId":"F70E0ADF-5F25-4FF1-9C07-6EB07893BECD"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"15144","Ordinal":"1","Title":"@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 add","CVE":"CVE-2026-15144","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"15144","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"@fastify/rate-limit before 11.2.0 keys rate-limit buckets by the verbatim client IP string returned from request.ip. Because a single IPv6 client can control a large address range (a /64 holds 2^64 distinct addresses) and the same address has multiple valid textual representations, an IPv6 capable client can defeat the rate-limit boundary by rotating addresses or by rewriting the same address in different forms. Applications that use @fastify/rate-limit to protect endpoints such as authentication, password reset, OTP delivery, or expensive API calls can be bypassed by IPv6 clients behind a proxy that surfaces IPv6 to the origin when trustProxy is enabled. The issue is fixed in @fastify/rate-limit 11.2.0, where the default key generator normalizes IPv6 addresses to their canonical form, collapses IPv4 mapped IPv6 to IPv4, and applies a configurable prefix mask (default /64) via a new ipv6Subnet option.","Type":"Description","Title":"@fastify/rate-limit vulnerable to rate-limit bypass via IPv6 add"}]}}}