{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-11-12T23:54:14+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-16240","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-16240","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-16240.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16240","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16240"},"summary":{"title":"PostgreSQL pg_basebackup can use backup manifest content as a format string","description":"Use of externally-controlled format string in PostgreSQL pg_basebackup allows an attacker having already compromised a server to achieve disclosure from pg_basebackup memory, via backup manifest bytes.  The vulnerability does not return the improperly-read bytes back to the attacker's server, so a successful attack would need separate implementation-specific secrets for that.  Integrity impact is unlikely; in particular, the applicable formatter does not support %n.  Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"PostgreSQL","published_at":"2026-11-12 15:17:50","updated_at":"2026-11-12 22:19:21"},"problem_types":["CWE-134","CWE-134 Use of Externally-Controlled Format String"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","type":"Secondary","score":"3.7","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"3.7","severity":"LOW","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","data":{"baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-16240/","name":"https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-16240/","refsource":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-16240","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-16240","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"PostgreSQL","version":"affected 18 18.7 rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"PostgreSQL","version":"affected 17 17.12 rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"PostgreSQL","version":"affected 16 16.16 rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"PostgreSQL","version":"affected 15 15.20 rpm","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"n/a","product":"PostgreSQL","version":"affected 14.25 rpm","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"The PostgreSQL project thanks Peter Eisentraut for reporting this problem.","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-16240","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-11-12T21:10:07.723348Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-11-12T21:41:47.325Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"PostgreSQL","vendor":"n/a","versions":[{"lessThan":"18.7","status":"affected","version":"18","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"17.12","status":"affected","version":"17","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"16.16","status":"affected","version":"16","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"15.20","status":"affected","version":"15","versionType":"rpm"},{"lessThan":"14.25","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"rpm"}]}],"configurations":[{"lang":"en","value":"attacker has compromised the server being backed up; attacker has a separate way to retrieve the improperly-read bytes from the host running pg_basebackup; victim runs a backup without starting the server from that backup"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","value":"The PostgreSQL project thanks Peter Eisentraut for reporting this problem."}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Use of externally-controlled format string in PostgreSQL pg_basebackup allows an attacker having already compromised a server to achieve disclosure from pg_basebackup memory, via backup manifest bytes.  The vulnerability does not return the improperly-read bytes back to the attacker's server, so a successful attack would need separate implementation-specific secrets for that.  Integrity impact is unlikely; in particular, the applicable formatter does not support %n.  Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS"}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-134","description":"Use of Externally-Controlled Format String","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-11-12T14:15:31.280Z","orgId":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","shortName":"PostgreSQL"},"references":[{"url":"https://www.postgresql.org/support/security/CVE-2026-16240/"}],"title":"PostgreSQL pg_basebackup can use backup manifest content as a format string","x_postgresql":{"component":"client"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","assignerShortName":"PostgreSQL","cveId":"CVE-2026-16240","datePublished":"2026-11-12T14:15:31.280Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-20T01:55:33.940Z","dateUpdated":"2026-11-12T21:41:47.325Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-11-12 15:17:50","lastModifiedDate":"2026-11-12 22:19:21","problem_types":["CWE-134","CWE-134 Use of Externally-Controlled Format String"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"f86ef6dc-4d3a-42ad-8f28-e6d5547a5007","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","baseScore":3.7,"baseSeverity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":1.4}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-11-12T21:10:07.723348Z","id":"CVE-2026-16240","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"16240","Ordinal":"1","Title":"PostgreSQL pg_basebackup can use backup manifest content as a fo","CVE":"CVE-2026-16240","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"16240","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Use of externally-controlled format string in PostgreSQL pg_basebackup allows an attacker having already compromised a server to achieve disclosure from pg_basebackup memory, via backup manifest bytes.  The vulnerability does not return the improperly-read bytes back to the attacker's server, so a successful attack would need separate implementation-specific secrets for that.  Integrity impact is unlikely; in particular, the applicable formatter does not support %n.  Versions before PostgreSQL 18.7, 17.12, 16.16, 15.20, and 14.25 are affected.","Type":"Description","Title":"PostgreSQL pg_basebackup can use backup manifest content as a fo"}]}}}