{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-06-22T14:03:52+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-30789","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-30789","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-30789.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-30789","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30789"},"summary":{"title":"RustDesk Auth Proof Uses Server-Controlled Salt/Challenge and Fast Double-SHA256, Enabling Offline Brute-Force","description":"Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing.\n\nThe authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction).\n\nThis issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"VULSec","published_at":"2026-03-05 16:16:19","updated_at":"2026-06-22 10:16:19"},"problem_types":["CWE-307","CWE-916","CWE-916 CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort","CWE-307 CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","type":"Secondary","score":"8.2","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"8.2","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"9.8","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":9.8,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/client/","name":"https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/client/","refsource":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","tags":["Product"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSds6jjpd38oO_yIAyd1HYtKNUuea-I-ozAPpGhYI7QgAU-QGJ7D8a4rOZVj1vmiUXV1EcdRHf9aZAW/pub","name":"https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSds6jjpd38oO_yIAyd1HYtKNUuea-I-ozAPpGhYI7QgAU-QGJ7D8a4rOZVj1vmiUXV1EcdRHf9aZAW/pub","refsource":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","tags":["Exploit","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.vulsec.org/","name":"https://www.vulsec.org/","refsource":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","tags":["Not Applicable"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-30789","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-30789","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"rustdesk-client","product":"RustDesk Client","version":"affected 1.4.8 custom","platforms":["Windows","MacOS","Linux","iOS","Android"]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"Add a client-side nonce to the auth proof and use a slow KDF (e.g., Argon2id). Transition to SRP.","time":"","lang":"en"}],"workarounds":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"Use long (16+ char) random passwords. Enable 2FA where available.","time":"","lang":"en"}],"exploits":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"PoC available.","time":"","lang":"en"}],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Erez Kalman","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Erez Kalman","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"30789","vulnerable":"0","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"apple","cpe5":"iphone_os","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"30789","vulnerable":"0","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"apple","cpe5":"macos","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"30789","vulnerable":"0","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"google","cpe5":"android","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"30789","vulnerable":"0","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"30789","vulnerable":"0","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"microsoft","cpe5":"windows","cpe6":"-","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"30789","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.5","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"rustdesk","cpe5":"rustdesk","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"webclient","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-30789","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-03-17T14:32:41.844771Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-03-17T14:32:45.784Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"collectionURL":"https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk/releases","defaultStatus":"affected","modules":["Client login","peer authentication"],"packageName":"rustdesk-client","platforms":["Windows","MacOS","Linux","iOS","Android"],"product":"RustDesk Client","programFiles":["src/client.rs"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"handle_hash()"},{"name":"handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction)"}],"repo":"https://github.com/rustdesk/rustdesk,https://github.com/rustdesk/hbb_common","vendor":"rustdesk-client","versions":[{"lessThanOrEqual":"1.4.8","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"custom"}]}],"configurations":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Default — any password-based authentication"}],"value":"Default — any password-based authentication"}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:windows:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.8","versionStartIncluding":"0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:macos:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.8","versionStartIncluding":"0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:linux:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.8","versionStartIncluding":"0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:ios:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.8","versionStartIncluding":"0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk-client:rustdesk_client:*:*:android:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.8","versionStartIncluding":"0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}],"operator":"OR"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Erez Kalman"},{"lang":"en","type":"reporter","value":"Erez Kalman"}],"datePublic":"2026-03-05T13:45:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing.<br><br>The authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery.<br><br>This vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction).<br><br>This issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8."}],"value":"Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing.\n\nThe authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction).\n\nThis issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8."}],"exploits":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"PoC available.<br>"}],"value":"PoC available."}],"impacts":[{"capecId":"CAPEC-49","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"CAPEC-49 Password Brute Forcing"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-916","description":"CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-307","description":"CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-06-22T08:22:37.764Z","orgId":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","shortName":"VULSec"},"references":[{"tags":["technical-description","x_--config documentation"],"url":"https://rustdesk.com/docs/en/client/"},{"tags":["third-party-advisory","exploit"],"url":"https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vSds6jjpd38oO_yIAyd1HYtKNUuea-I-ozAPpGhYI7QgAU-QGJ7D8a4rOZVj1vmiUXV1EcdRHf9aZAW/pub"},{"tags":["vdb-entry","third-party-advisory"],"url":"https://www.vulsec.org/"}],"solutions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Add a client-side nonce to the auth proof and use a slow KDF (e.g., Argon2id). Transition to SRP."}],"value":"Add a client-side nonce to the auth proof and use a slow KDF (e.g., Argon2id). Transition to SRP."}],"source":{"discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"RustDesk Auth Proof Uses Server-Controlled Salt/Challenge and Fast Double-SHA256, Enabling Offline Brute-Force","workarounds":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Use long (16+ char) random passwords. Enable 2FA where available."}],"value":"Use long (16+ char) random passwords. Enable 2FA where available."}],"x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 0.5.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","assignerShortName":"VULSec","cveId":"CVE-2026-30789","datePublished":"2026-03-05T15:41:51.417Z","dateReserved":"2026-03-05T14:13:37.202Z","dateUpdated":"2026-06-22T08:22:37.764Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-03-05 16:16:19","lastModifiedDate":"2026-06-22 10:16:19","problem_types":["CWE-307","CWE-916","CWE-916 CWE-916 Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort","CWE-307 CWE-307 Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"2fdefc65-d750-4b8d-96ee-6e2c0c42dbfe","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":9.8,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":5.9}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-03-17T14:32:41.844771Z","id":"CVE-2026-30789","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"operator":"AND","nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:rustdesk:rustdesk:*:*:*:*:webclient:*:*:*","versionEndIncluding":"1.4.5","matchCriteriaId":"14986BCF-B589-41F2-913D-2800283B452B"}]},{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":false,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:apple:iphone_os:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"B5415705-33E5-46D5-8E4D-9EBADC8C5705"},{"vulnerable":false,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:apple:macos:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"387021A0-AF36-463C-A605-32EA7DAC172E"},{"vulnerable":false,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:google:android:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F8B9FEC8-73B6-43B8-B24E-1F7C20D91D26"},{"vulnerable":false,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"703AF700-7A70-47E2-BC3A-7FD03B3CA9C1"},{"vulnerable":false,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"A2572D17-1DE6-457B-99CC-64AFD54487EA"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"30789","Ordinal":"1","Title":"RustDesk Auth Proof Uses Server-Controlled Salt/Challenge and Fa","CVE":"CVE-2026-30789","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"30789","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort, Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts vulnerability in rustdesk-client RustDesk Client rustdesk-client on Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android (Client login, peer authentication modules) allows Password Brute Forcing.\n\nThe authentication proof is SHA256(SHA256(password + salt) + challenge), where both the salt and the challenge are generated entirely by the server with no client-side nonce, and the hash uses no slow key-derivation function. A rogue or on-path API/relay server (see CVE-2026-30794 / CVE-2026-30797) can issue a chosen salt and challenge, capture the resulting proof, and recover the password offline. The capture-replay claim (CWE-294) is withdrawn: the challenge is regenerated per connection (challenge = Config::get_auto_password(6)), so a captured proof is not replayable against the legitimate server. The 1.4.7 OTP brute-force limiter and the existing LOGIN_FAILURES counter constrain only ONLINE attempts and do not address offline recovery.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files src/client.rs and program routines handle_hash(), handle_login_from_ui() (login proof construction).\n\nThis issue affects RustDesk Client: through 1.4.8.","Type":"Description","Title":"RustDesk Auth Proof Uses Server-Controlled Salt/Challenge and Fa"}]}}}