{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T13:43:00+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-31420","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-31420","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-31420.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31420"},"summary":{"title":"bridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic\n\nbr_mrp_start_test() and br_mrp_start_in_test() accept the user-supplied\ninterval value from netlink without validation. When interval is 0,\nusecs_to_jiffies(0) yields 0, causing the delayed work\n(br_mrp_test_work_expired / br_mrp_in_test_work_expired) to reschedule\nitself with zero delay. This creates a tight loop on system_percpu_wq\nthat allocates and transmits MRP test frames at maximum rate, exhausting\nall system memory and causing a kernel panic via OOM deadlock.\n\nThe same zero-interval issue applies to br_mrp_start_in_test_parse()\nfor interconnect test frames.\n\nUse NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U32, 1) in the nla_policy tables for both\nIFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_INTERVAL and\nIFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_IN_TEST_INTERVAL, so zero is rejected at the\nnetlink attribute parsing layer before the value ever reaches the\nworkqueue scheduling code. This is consistent with how other bridge\nsubsystems (br_fdb, br_mst) enforce range constraints on netlink\nattributes.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"Linux","published_at":"2026-04-13 14:16:11","updated_at":"2026-06-01 17:16:46"},"problem_types":["CWE-667"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5.5","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8ec80430bfa520e7352155d6ac632e527cba7aa","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8ec80430bfa520e7352155d6ac632e527cba7aa","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9bc352f716d1bebfe43354bce539ec2d0223b30","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9bc352f716d1bebfe43354bce539ec2d0223b30","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa6e24963342de4370e3a3c9af41e38277b74cf3","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa6e24963342de4370e3a3c9af41e38277b74cf3","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/630a15a31c2034b5b697f4aabc769b9d80d82446","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/630a15a31c2034b5b697f4aabc769b9d80d82446","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31420","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31420","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d 630a15a31c2034b5b697f4aabc769b9d80d82446 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d e8ec80430bfa520e7352155d6ac632e527cba7aa git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d c9bc352f716d1bebfe43354bce539ec2d0223b30 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d fa6e24963342de4370e3a3c9af41e38277b74cf3 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 5.8","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 5.8 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.12.92 6.12.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.18.34 6.18.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.19.12 6.19.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 7.0 * original_commit_for_fix","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"rc1","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"rc2","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"rc3","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"rc4","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"rc5","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"},{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"o","cpe4":"linux","cpe5":"linux_kernel","cpe6":"7.0","cpe7":"rc6","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"31420","cve":"CVE-2026-31420","epss":"0.000130000","percentile":"0.024970000","score_date":"2026-06-04","updated_at":"2026-06-05 00:02:15"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"lessThan":"630a15a31c2034b5b697f4aabc769b9d80d82446","status":"affected","version":"20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"e8ec80430bfa520e7352155d6ac632e527cba7aa","status":"affected","version":"20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"c9bc352f716d1bebfe43354bce539ec2d0223b30","status":"affected","version":"20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"fa6e24963342de4370e3a3c9af41e38277b74cf3","status":"affected","version":"20f6a05ef63594feb0c6dfbd629da0448b43124d","versionType":"git"}]},{"defaultStatus":"affected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["net/bridge/br_mrp_netlink.c"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"5.8"},{"lessThan":"5.8","status":"unaffected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"6.12.*","status":"unaffected","version":"6.12.92","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"6.18.*","status":"unaffected","version":"6.18.34","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"6.19.*","status":"unaffected","version":"6.19.12","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"7.0","versionType":"original_commit_for_fix"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.12.92","versionStartIncluding":"5.8","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.18.34","versionStartIncluding":"5.8","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.19.12","versionStartIncluding":"5.8","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.0","versionStartIncluding":"5.8","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic\n\nbr_mrp_start_test() and br_mrp_start_in_test() accept the user-supplied\ninterval value from netlink without validation. When interval is 0,\nusecs_to_jiffies(0) yields 0, causing the delayed work\n(br_mrp_test_work_expired / br_mrp_in_test_work_expired) to reschedule\nitself with zero delay. This creates a tight loop on system_percpu_wq\nthat allocates and transmits MRP test frames at maximum rate, exhausting\nall system memory and causing a kernel panic via OOM deadlock.\n\nThe same zero-interval issue applies to br_mrp_start_in_test_parse()\nfor interconnect test frames.\n\nUse NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U32, 1) in the nla_policy tables for both\nIFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_INTERVAL and\nIFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_IN_TEST_INTERVAL, so zero is rejected at the\nnetlink attribute parsing layer before the value ever reaches the\nworkqueue scheduling code. This is consistent with how other bridge\nsubsystems (br_fdb, br_mst) enforce range constraints on netlink\nattributes."}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-06-01T16:11:26.083Z","orgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","shortName":"Linux"},"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/630a15a31c2034b5b697f4aabc769b9d80d82446"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e8ec80430bfa520e7352155d6ac632e527cba7aa"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9bc352f716d1bebfe43354bce539ec2d0223b30"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fa6e24963342de4370e3a3c9af41e38277b74cf3"}],"title":"bridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic","x_generator":{"engine":"bippy-1.2.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","assignerShortName":"Linux","cveId":"CVE-2026-31420","datePublished":"2026-04-13T13:40:24.594Z","dateReserved":"2026-03-09T15:48:24.088Z","dateUpdated":"2026-06-01T16:11:26.083Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-04-13 14:16:11","lastModifiedDate":"2026-06-01 17:16:46","problem_types":["CWE-667"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":5.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":1.8,"impactScore":3.6}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"5.8","versionEndExcluding":"6.19.12","matchCriteriaId":"B469E475-132D-4946-9735-CFEFE1A51CA7"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F253B622-8837-4245-BCE5-A7BF8FC76A16"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"4AE85AD8-4641-4E7C-A2F4-305E2CD9EE64"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"F666C8D8-6538-46D4-B318-87610DE64C34"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"02259FDA-961B-47BC-AE7F-93D7EC6E90C2"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"58A9FEFF-C040-420D-8F0A-BFDAAA1DF258"},{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:7.0:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*","matchCriteriaId":"1D2315C0-D46F-4F85-9754-F9E5E11374A6"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"31420","Ordinal":"1","Title":"bridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic","CVE":"CVE-2026-31420","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"31420","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic\n\nbr_mrp_start_test() and br_mrp_start_in_test() accept the user-supplied\ninterval value from netlink without validation. When interval is 0,\nusecs_to_jiffies(0) yields 0, causing the delayed work\n(br_mrp_test_work_expired / br_mrp_in_test_work_expired) to reschedule\nitself with zero delay. This creates a tight loop on system_percpu_wq\nthat allocates and transmits MRP test frames at maximum rate, exhausting\nall system memory and causing a kernel panic via OOM deadlock.\n\nThe same zero-interval issue applies to br_mrp_start_in_test_parse()\nfor interconnect test frames.\n\nUse NLA_POLICY_MIN(NLA_U32, 1) in the nla_policy tables for both\nIFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_TEST_INTERVAL and\nIFLA_BRIDGE_MRP_START_IN_TEST_INTERVAL, so zero is rejected at the\nnetlink attribute parsing layer before the value ever reaches the\nworkqueue scheduling code. This is consistent with how other bridge\nsubsystems (br_fdb, br_mst) enforce range constraints on netlink\nattributes.","Type":"Description","Title":"bridge: mrp: reject zero test interval to avoid OOM panic"}]}}}