{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-05-05T12:37:40+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-32148","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-32148","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-32148.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32148","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32148"},"summary":{"title":"Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integrity bypass","description":"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\n\nHex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\n\nAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\n\nThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"EEF","published_at":"2026-04-30 19:16:09","updated_at":"2026-05-05 02:16:49"},"problem_types":["CWE-354","CWE-494","CWE-354 CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value","CWE-494 CWE-494 Download of Code Without Integrity Check"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","score":"8.9","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":8.9,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"ACTIVE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","subIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","subAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"8.9","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H","data":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.9,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","subIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","userInteraction":"ACTIVE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"5.9","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e","name":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32148","name":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32148","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":["Exploit","Third Party Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32148.html","name":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32148.html","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":["Third Party Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v","name":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":["Exploit","Patch","Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32148","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32148","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"hexpm","product":"hex","version":"affected 0.16.0 2.4.2 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"hexpm","product":"hex","version":"affected e01576f28c64af9fae6eb17e2dad30f6efcb303c d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e git","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Paul Fleischer","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Eric Meadows-Jönsson / Hex.pm","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"32148","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"hex","cpe5":"hex","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"32148","cve":"CVE-2026-32148","epss":"0.000190000","percentile":"0.052090000","score_date":"2026-05-04","updated_at":"2026-05-05 00:07:31"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-32148","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-04-30T19:03:06.385106Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-04-30T19:03:24.858Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["'Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger'"],"packageName":"hex","packageURL":"pkg:otp/hex?repository_url=https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhexpm%2Fhex&vcs_url=git%20https:%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fhexpm%2Fhex.git","product":"hex","programFiles":["lib/hex/remote_converger.ex"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"'Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger':verify_resolved/2"}],"repo":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex","vendor":"hexpm","versions":[{"lessThan":"2.4.2","status":"affected","version":"0.16.0","versionType":"semver"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://github.com","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["'Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger'"],"packageName":"hexpm/hex","packageURL":"pkg:github/hexpm/hex","product":"hex","programFiles":["lib/hex/remote_converger.ex"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"'Elixir.Hex.RemoteConverger':verify_resolved/2"}],"repo":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex.git","vendor":"hexpm","versions":[{"lessThan":"d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e","status":"affected","version":"e01576f28c64af9fae6eb17e2dad30f6efcb303c","versionType":"git"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:hexpm:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"2.4.2","versionStartIncluding":"0.16.0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}],"operator":"AND"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Paul Fleischer"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation developer","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation reviewer","value":"Eric Meadows-Jönsson / Hex.pm"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (<tt>Hex.RemoteConverger</tt> module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.<p>Hex stores checksums for dependencies in the <tt>mix.lock</tt> file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, <tt>Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2</tt> never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by <tt>Hex.Utils.lock/1</tt> uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.</p><p>An attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The <tt>mix.lock</tt> file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.</p><p>This issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.</p>"}],"value":"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\n\nHex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\n\nAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\n\nThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.9,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","subIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","userInteraction":"ACTIVE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-354","description":"CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-494","description":"CWE-494 Download of Code Without Integrity Check","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-05-01T04:33:38.198Z","orgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","shortName":"EEF"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory","related"],"url":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/security/advisories/GHSA-hmv9-4mfr-m92v"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-32148.html"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-32148"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/hexpm/hex/commit/d7528c8199a1144511508bf3a6460026a5a14c8e"}],"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"title":"Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integrity bypass","x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","assignerShortName":"EEF","cveId":"CVE-2026-32148","datePublished":"2026-04-30T18:17:03.783Z","dateReserved":"2026-03-10T22:37:29.213Z","dateUpdated":"2026-05-01T04:33:38.198Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-04-30 19:16:09","lastModifiedDate":"2026-05-05 02:16:49","problem_types":["CWE-354","CWE-494","CWE-354 CWE-354 Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value","CWE-494 CWE-494 Download of Code Without Integrity Check"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":8.9,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"ACTIVE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","subIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","subAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":3.6}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:hex:hex:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"0.16.0","versionEndExcluding":"2.4.2","matchCriteriaId":"A7D2A388-56D7-4B82-85AB-6B7C22A6AC18"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"32148","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integri","CVE":"CVE-2026-32148","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"32148","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in hexpm hex (Hex.RemoteConverger module) allows dependency integrity bypass via unverified lockfile checksums.\n\nHex stores checksums for dependencies in the mix.lock file to ensure reproducible and integrity-checked builds. However, Hex.RemoteConverger.verify_resolved/2 never executes checksum verification because the lock data returned by Hex.Utils.lock/1 uses string-based dependency names, while the verification logic compares against atom-based names. This type mismatch causes the verification code path to be silently skipped. Checksums are still validated when packages are initially downloaded from the registry, but mismatches between the lockfile and resolved dependencies are not detected.\n\nAn attacker who can influence cached packages (e.g., via local cache poisoning or a compromised registry) can provide modified dependency contents that will be accepted without detection. The mix.lock file is silently rewritten with the checksum values from the registry, erasing evidence of tampering.\n\nThis issue affects hex: from 0.16.0 before 2.4.2.","Type":"Description","Title":"Lockfile checksums not verified in Hex allows dependency integri"}]}}}