DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.
pkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.
"}],"value":"DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\n\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"PHYSICAL","baseScore":0,"baseSeverity":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-04-07T17:58:12.217Z","orgId":"28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22","shortName":"PSF"},"references":[{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/146122"},{"tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/WYLLVQOOCKGK73JM7Z7ZSNOJC4N7BAWY/"},{"tags":["issue-tracking"],"url":"https://github.com/python/cpython/issues/146121"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/bcdf231946b1da8bdfbab4c05539bb0cc964a1c7"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5af6ce3e7b643a30a02d22245c1e3f4a8bc0a1fe"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/cf59bf76470f3d75ad47d80ffb8ce76b64b5e943"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d786d59a8f7196bb630100a869f28ad13436b59c"}],"source":{"discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"tags":["disputed"],"title":"pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions","x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 0.6.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"28c92f92-d60d-412d-b760-e73465c3df22","assignerShortName":"PSF","cveId":"CVE-2026-3479","datePublished":"2026-03-18T18:13:42.288Z","dateReserved":"2026-03-03T14:18:35.394Z","dateUpdated":"2026-04-07T17:58:12.217Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-03-18 19:16:06","lastModifiedDate":"2026-04-07 18:16:46","problem_types":["CWE-22","CWE-22 CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"cna@python.org","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":0,"baseSeverity":"NONE","attackVector":"PHYSICAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"3479","Ordinal":"1","Title":"pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions","CVE":"CVE-2026-3479","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"3479","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"DISPUTED: The project has clarified that the documentation was incorrect, and that pkgutil.get_data() has the same security model as open(). The documentation has been updated to clarify this point. There is no vulnerability in the function if following the intended security model.\n\npkgutil.get_data() did not validate the resource argument as documented, allowing path traversals.","Type":"Description","Title":"pkgutil.get_data() does not enforce documented restrictions"}]}}}