{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T10:07:59+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-44690","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-44690","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-44690.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44690","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44690"},"summary":{"title":"Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation","description":"In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent's NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"NLnet Labs","published_at":"2026-07-22 14:17:19","updated_at":"2026-07-22 20:33:11"},"problem_types":["CWE-345","CWE-345 CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","type":"Secondary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","data":{"baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44690.txt","name":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44690.txt","refsource":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-44690","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-44690","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"NLnet Labs","product":"Unbound","version":"affected 1.7.0 1.25.2 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"NLnet Labs shares patch"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Qifan Zhang verifies patch"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Multi-vendor coordinated fixes released with version 1.25.2"}],"solutions":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2","time":"","lang":"en"}],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-44690","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-07-22T18:56:03.722157Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T18:56:16.014Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Unbound","vendor":"NLnet Labs","versions":[{"lessThan":"1.25.2","status":"affected","version":"1.7.0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"}],"datePublic":"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent's NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-345","description":"CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T13:06:56.684Z","orgId":"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6","shortName":"NLnet Labs"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-44690.txt"}],"solutions":[{"lang":"en","value":"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"}],"timeline":[{"lang":"en","time":"2026-04-13T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z","value":"NLnet Labs shares patch"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Qifan Zhang verifies patch"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Multi-vendor coordinated fixes released with version 1.25.2"}],"title":"Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation","x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6","assignerShortName":"NLnet Labs","cveId":"CVE-2026-44690","datePublished":"2026-07-22T13:06:56.684Z","dateReserved":"2026-06-22T12:35:21.352Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T18:56:16.014Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-07-22 14:17:19","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-22 20:33:11","problem_types":["CWE-345","CWE-345 CWE-345: Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-07-22T18:56:03.722157Z","id":"CVE-2026-44690","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"44690","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulatio","CVE":"CVE-2026-44690","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"44690","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.7.0 up to and including 1.25.1, insufficient validation of the RRSIG.Labels field combined with premature cache writes during RFC 8198 aggressive NSEC processing leads to cache poisoning that permits a malicious actor controlling a single delegated zone to poison arbitrary sibling zones under NSEC-signed parent domains. A malicious actor with one registered domain under an NSEC-signed TLD can serve malicious insecure DNS responses for unrelated sibling domains (sharing the same parent zone). Arbitrary delegations that do not exist under the parent domain and are covered by the parent's NSEC chain can be brought into insecure existence by fraudulent wildcard DS records (less labels than expected, unknown algorithm) from the malicious sibling domain. This allows the malicious actor to inject insecure wildcard records for those delegations.","Type":"Description","Title":"Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulatio"}]}}}