{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-06-22T06:57:32+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-45357","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-45357","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-45357.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45357","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45357"},"summary":{"title":"LiquidJS: Memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width padding in `date` filter (strftime)","description":"LiquidJS is a Shopify/GitHub Pages compatible template engine written in pure JavaScript. In versions 10.25.7 and below, the date filter's strftime implementation parses width specifiers like %9999999d and forwards the captured width unchecked into pad()/padStart(), leading to memory and render limit bypass. In src/util/underscore.ts, the pad loop performs unbounded string concatenation without consulting the Context's memoryLimit or renderLimit, so a single small template ({{ x | date: '%5000000d' }}) produces megabytes of output and unbounded CPU. The memoryLimit and renderLimit options the docs (src/liquid-options.ts:87-92) advertise as DoS controls — and which the docstring explicitly mentions for strftime — are entirely bypassed. Exploitation can cause large memory allocations, high CPU usage, or OOM crashes per render. This issue has been fixed in version 10.26.0.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-06-17 23:17:03","updated_at":"2026-06-18 14:17:26"},"problem_types":["CWE-400","CWE-400 CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/3129d46dc95efa357b00e5a57ee1af80a13d72ed","name":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/3129d46dc95efa357b00e5a57ee1af80a13d72ed","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.26.0","name":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.26.0","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q","name":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45357","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45357","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"harttle","product":"liquidjs","version":"affected < 10.26.0","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"45357","cve":"CVE-2026-45357","epss":"0.006550000","percentile":"0.464810000","score_date":"2026-06-21","updated_at":"2026-06-22 00:08:34"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-45357","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-06-18T12:48:36.994250Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-06-18T12:49:15.361Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"liquidjs","vendor":"harttle","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"< 10.26.0"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"LiquidJS is a Shopify/GitHub Pages compatible template engine written in pure JavaScript. In versions 10.25.7 and below, the date filter's strftime implementation parses width specifiers like %9999999d and forwards the captured width unchecked into pad()/padStart(), leading to memory and render limit bypass. In src/util/underscore.ts, the pad loop performs unbounded string concatenation without consulting the Context's memoryLimit or renderLimit, so a single small template ({{ x | date: '%5000000d' }}) produces megabytes of output and unbounded CPU. The memoryLimit and renderLimit options the docs (src/liquid-options.ts:87-92) advertise as DoS controls — and which the docstring explicitly mentions for strftime — are entirely bypassed. Exploitation can cause large memory allocations, high CPU usage, or OOM crashes per render. This issue has been fixed in version 10.26.0."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-400","description":"CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-06-17T22:32:20.643Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/security/advisories/GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q"},{"name":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/3129d46dc95efa357b00e5a57ee1af80a13d72ed","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/commit/3129d46dc95efa357b00e5a57ee1af80a13d72ed"},{"name":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.26.0","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/harttle/liquidjs/releases/tag/v10.26.0"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-hh27-hf48-9f5q","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"LiquidJS: Memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width padding in `date` filter (strftime)"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-45357","datePublished":"2026-06-17T22:32:20.643Z","dateReserved":"2026-05-11T21:40:08.179Z","dateUpdated":"2026-06-18T12:49:15.361Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-06-17 23:17:03","lastModifiedDate":"2026-06-18 14:17:26","problem_types":["CWE-400","CWE-400 CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-06-18T12:48:36.994250Z","id":"CVE-2026-45357","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"45357","Ordinal":"1","Title":"LiquidJS: Memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width pad","CVE":"CVE-2026-45357","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"45357","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"LiquidJS is a Shopify/GitHub Pages compatible template engine written in pure JavaScript. In versions 10.25.7 and below, the date filter's strftime implementation parses width specifiers like %9999999d and forwards the captured width unchecked into pad()/padStart(), leading to memory and render limit bypass. In src/util/underscore.ts, the pad loop performs unbounded string concatenation without consulting the Context's memoryLimit or renderLimit, so a single small template ({{ x | date: '%5000000d' }}) produces megabytes of output and unbounded CPU. The memoryLimit and renderLimit options the docs (src/liquid-options.ts:87-92) advertise as DoS controls — and which the docstring explicitly mentions for strftime — are entirely bypassed. Exploitation can cause large memory allocations, high CPU usage, or OOM crashes per render. This issue has been fixed in version 10.26.0.","Type":"Description","Title":"LiquidJS: Memory and render limit bypass via unbounded width pad"}]}}}