{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-05-29T16:24:06+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-45787","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-45787","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-45787.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45787","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45787"},"summary":{"title":"electerm's encrypt method not safe enough","description":"electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. Prior to 3.9.5, deterministic AES-192-CBC with a fixed zero IV, constant KDF salt, and no MAC leads to confidentiality and integrity failures for synced bookmark/profile data. Attackers can crack common passwords across installs and perform undetected ciphertext bit-flips to alter config/bookmarks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.9.5.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-05-28 18:16:35","updated_at":"2026-05-29 15:34:31"},"problem_types":["CWE-326","CWE-329","CWE-353","CWE-759","CWE-916","CWE-326 CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength","CWE-329 CWE-329: Generation of Predictable IV with CBC Mode","CWE-353 CWE-353: Missing Support for Integrity Check","CWE-759 CWE-759: Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt","CWE-916 CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"6","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"6","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"LOW","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b980cd45dfc5ed11ad79b937","name":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b980cd45dfc5ed11ad79b937","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh","name":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45787","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45787","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"electerm","product":"electerm","version":"affected < 3.9.5","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"electerm","vendor":"electerm","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"< 3.9.5"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. Prior to 3.9.5, deterministic AES-192-CBC with a fixed zero IV, constant KDF salt, and no MAC leads to confidentiality and integrity failures for synced bookmark/profile data. Attackers can crack common passwords across installs and perform undetected ciphertext bit-flips to alter config/bookmarks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.9.5."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"LOW","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-326","description":"CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-329","description":"CWE-329: Generation of Predictable IV with CBC Mode","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-353","description":"CWE-353: Missing Support for Integrity Check","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-759","description":"CWE-759: Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-916","description":"CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-05-28T17:17:56.385Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/security/advisories/GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh"},{"name":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b980cd45dfc5ed11ad79b937","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/electerm/electerm/commit/9dd8295e37d53396b980cd45dfc5ed11ad79b937"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-g29v-q6h7-76wh","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"electerm's encrypt method not safe enough"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-45787","datePublished":"2026-05-28T17:17:56.385Z","dateReserved":"2026-05-13T08:19:32.602Z","dateUpdated":"2026-05-28T17:17:56.385Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-05-28 18:16:35","lastModifiedDate":"2026-05-29 15:34:31","problem_types":["CWE-326","CWE-329","CWE-353","CWE-759","CWE-916","CWE-326 CWE-326: Inadequate Encryption Strength","CWE-329 CWE-329: Generation of Predictable IV with CBC Mode","CWE-353 CWE-353: Missing Support for Integrity Check","CWE-759 CWE-759: Use of a One-Way Hash without a Salt","CWE-916 CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":6,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"45787","Ordinal":"1","Title":"electerm's encrypt method not safe enough","CVE":"CVE-2026-45787","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"45787","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"electerm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. Prior to 3.9.5, deterministic AES-192-CBC with a fixed zero IV, constant KDF salt, and no MAC leads to confidentiality and integrity failures for synced bookmark/profile data. Attackers can crack common passwords across installs and perform undetected ciphertext bit-flips to alter config/bookmarks. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.9.5.","Type":"Description","Title":"electerm's encrypt method not safe enough"}]}}}