{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-05-28T04:03:19+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-47071","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-47071","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-47071.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47071","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47071"},"summary":{"title":"SOCKS5 TLS upgrade ignores caller timeout in hackney","description":"Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows Flooding. The SOCKS5 transport in src/hackney_socks5.erl correctly applies the caller-supplied timeout to the SOCKS5 negotiation phase, but then upgrades the connection to TLS using the two-argument form ssl:connect/2, which defaults to an infinite timeout. The Timeout value is in scope at the call site but is not forwarded. A hostile SOCKS5 proxy that completes the SOCKS5 handshake normally and then goes silent (or sends a partial TLS ServerHello and stalls) will cause the connecting process to block indefinitely, regardless of the connect_timeout or recv_timeout options supplied by the caller.\n\nThis issue affects hackney: from 0.10.0 before 4.0.1.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"EEF","published_at":"2026-05-25 15:16:22","updated_at":"2026-05-27 13:56:30"},"problem_types":["CWE-400","CWE-400 CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","score":"8.2","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"8.2","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-47071","name":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-47071","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":["Third Party Advisory","Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-gp9c-pm5m-5cxr","name":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-gp9c-pm5m-5cxr","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":["Exploit","Patch","Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-47071.html","name":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-47071.html","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":["Third Party Advisory","Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/5ccdab725c561a6f03d05a51f2d0664f98236dae","name":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/5ccdab725c561a6f03d05a51f2d0664f98236dae","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":["Patch"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47071","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47071","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"benoitc","product":"hackney","version":"affected 0.10.0 4.0.1 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"benoitc","product":"hackney","version":"affected 34cdbd1d20a282aacc286a89327465a3925b4c5d 5ccdab725c561a6f03d05a51f2d0664f98236dae git","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Peter Ullrich","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Benoit Chesneau","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Jonatan Männchen","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"47071","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"benoitc","cpe5":"hackney","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"47071","cve":"CVE-2026-47071","epss":"0.000420000","percentile":"0.131290000","score_date":"2026-05-27","updated_at":"2026-05-28 00:02:12"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-47071","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-05-26T15:48:41.704626Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-05-26T15:48:45.842Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-gp9c-pm5m-5cxr"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"collectionURL":"https://repo.hex.pm","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:benoitc:hackney:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["hackney_socks5"],"packageName":"hackney","packageURL":"pkg:hex/hackney","product":"hackney","programFiles":["src/hackney_socks5.erl"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"hackney_socks5:connect/4"}],"repo":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney","vendor":"benoitc","versions":[{"lessThan":"4.0.1","status":"affected","version":"0.10.0","versionType":"semver"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://github.com","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:benoitc:hackney:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["hackney_socks5"],"packageName":"benoitc/hackney","packageURL":"pkg:github/benoitc/hackney","product":"hackney","programFiles":["src/hackney_socks5.erl"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"hackney_socks5:connect/4"}],"repo":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney","vendor":"benoitc","versions":[{"lessThan":"5ccdab725c561a6f03d05a51f2d0664f98236dae","status":"affected","version":"34cdbd1d20a282aacc286a89327465a3925b4c5d","versionType":"git"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:benoitc:hackney:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"4.0.1","versionStartIncluding":"0.10.0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"AND"}],"operator":"AND"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Peter Ullrich"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation developer","value":"Benoit Chesneau"},{"lang":"en","type":"analyst","value":"Jonatan Männchen"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows Flooding.<p>The SOCKS5 transport in <tt>src/hackney_socks5.erl</tt> correctly applies the caller-supplied timeout to the SOCKS5 negotiation phase, but then upgrades the connection to TLS using the two-argument form <tt>ssl:connect/2</tt>, which defaults to an infinite timeout. The <tt>Timeout</tt> value is in scope at the call site but is not forwarded. A hostile SOCKS5 proxy that completes the SOCKS5 handshake normally and then goes silent (or sends a partial TLS ServerHello and stalls) will cause the connecting process to block indefinitely, regardless of the <tt>connect_timeout</tt> or <tt>recv_timeout</tt> options supplied by the caller.</p><p>This issue affects hackney: from 0.10.0 before 4.0.1.</p>"}],"value":"Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows Flooding. The SOCKS5 transport in src/hackney_socks5.erl correctly applies the caller-supplied timeout to the SOCKS5 negotiation phase, but then upgrades the connection to TLS using the two-argument form ssl:connect/2, which defaults to an infinite timeout. The Timeout value is in scope at the call site but is not forwarded. A hostile SOCKS5 proxy that completes the SOCKS5 handshake normally and then goes silent (or sends a partial TLS ServerHello and stalls) will cause the connecting process to block indefinitely, regardless of the connect_timeout or recv_timeout options supplied by the caller.\n\nThis issue affects hackney: from 0.10.0 before 4.0.1."}],"impacts":[{"capecId":"CAPEC-130","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"CAPEC-130 Excessive Allocation"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-400","description":"CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-05-26T19:46:41.765Z","orgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","shortName":"EEF"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory","related"],"url":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/security/advisories/GHSA-gp9c-pm5m-5cxr"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-47071.html"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-47071"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/benoitc/hackney/commit/5ccdab725c561a6f03d05a51f2d0664f98236dae"}],"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"title":"SOCKS5 TLS upgrade ignores caller timeout in hackney","x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","assignerShortName":"EEF","cveId":"CVE-2026-47071","datePublished":"2026-05-25T14:00:41.112Z","dateReserved":"2026-05-18T17:28:08.322Z","dateUpdated":"2026-05-26T19:46:41.765Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-05-25 15:16:22","lastModifiedDate":"2026-05-27 13:56:30","problem_types":["CWE-400","CWE-400 CWE-400 Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":8.2,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"NONE","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"nvd@nist.gov","type":"Primary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:benoitc:hackney:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionStartIncluding":"0.10.0","versionEndExcluding":"4.0.1","matchCriteriaId":"7C34AFFA-7B8D-45F0-B4BA-A3242DE2E532"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"47071","Ordinal":"1","Title":"SOCKS5 TLS upgrade ignores caller timeout in hackney","CVE":"CVE-2026-47071","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"47071","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in benoitc hackney allows Flooding. The SOCKS5 transport in src/hackney_socks5.erl correctly applies the caller-supplied timeout to the SOCKS5 negotiation phase, but then upgrades the connection to TLS using the two-argument form ssl:connect/2, which defaults to an infinite timeout. The Timeout value is in scope at the call site but is not forwarded. A hostile SOCKS5 proxy that completes the SOCKS5 handshake normally and then goes silent (or sends a partial TLS ServerHello and stalls) will cause the connecting process to block indefinitely, regardless of the connect_timeout or recv_timeout options supplied by the caller.\n\nThis issue affects hackney: from 0.10.0 before 4.0.1.","Type":"Description","Title":"SOCKS5 TLS upgrade ignores caller timeout in hackney"}]}}}