{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-10-24T09:35:49+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-48077","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-48077","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-48077.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48077","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48077"},"summary":{"title":"OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment record without authorization","description":"OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-08-06 22:17:10","updated_at":"2026-10-23 21:10:00"},"problem_types":["CWE-862","CWE-862 CWE-862: Missing Authorization"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"5.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"5.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b","name":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf","name":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-48077","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-48077","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"open-reception","product":"appointment-booking-software","version":"affected < 1.1.0","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"48077","cve":"CVE-2026-48077","epss":"0.004340000","percentile":"0.366830000","score_date":"2026-10-23","updated_at":"2026-10-24 00:06:29"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-48077","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-08-07T15:00:28.462761Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-07T17:09:07.285Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"appointment-booking-software","vendor":"open-reception","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"< 1.1.0"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-862","description":"CWE-862: Missing Authorization","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-06T20:47:06.576Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf"},{"name":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment record without authorization"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-48077","datePublished":"2026-08-06T20:47:06.576Z","dateReserved":"2026-05-20T18:25:25.708Z","dateUpdated":"2026-08-07T17:09:07.285Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-08-06 22:17:10","lastModifiedDate":"2026-10-23 21:10:00","problem_types":["CWE-862","CWE-862 CWE-862: Missing Authorization"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N","baseScore":5.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":1.4}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-08-07T15:00:28.462761Z","id":"CVE-2026-48077","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"48077","Ordinal":"1","Title":"OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment re","CVE":"CVE-2026-48077","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"48077","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.","Type":"Description","Title":"OpenReception: GET appointment by ID returns full appointment re"}]}}}