{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T12:47:59+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-50243","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-50243","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-50243.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50243","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50243"},"summary":{"title":"'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL","description":"In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"NLnet Labs","published_at":"2026-07-22 14:17:20","updated_at":"2026-07-22 20:33:11"},"problem_types":["CWE-348","CWE-348 CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","type":"Secondary","score":"6.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"LOW","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"6.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N","data":{"baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N","version":"4.0"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50243.txt","name":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50243.txt","refsource":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-50243","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-50243","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"NLnet Labs","product":"Unbound","version":"affected 1.6.2 1.25.2 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-05-09T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-06-08T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"NLnet Labs shares patch"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Qifan Zhang verifies patch"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Fixes released with version 1.25.2"}],"solutions":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2","time":"","lang":"en"}],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-50243","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-07-22T18:57:49.710450Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T18:58:00.043Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Unbound","vendor":"NLnet Labs","versions":[{"lessThan":"1.25.2","status":"affected","version":"1.6.2","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Qifan Zhang (Palo Alto Networks)"}],"datePublic":"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N","version":"4.0"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-348","description":"CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T13:08:21.443Z","orgId":"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6","shortName":"NLnet Labs"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-50243.txt"}],"solutions":[{"lang":"en","value":"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.25.2"}],"timeline":[{"lang":"en","time":"2026-05-09T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Issue reported by Qifan Zhang"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-06-08T00:00:00.000Z","value":"NLnet Labs shares patch"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-06-11T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Qifan Zhang verifies patch"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-07-22T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Fixes released with version 1.25.2"}],"title":"'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returning SERVFAIL","x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6","assignerShortName":"NLnet Labs","cveId":"CVE-2026-50243","datePublished":"2026-07-22T13:08:21.443Z","dateReserved":"2026-06-22T12:27:22.796Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T18:58:00.043Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-07-22 14:17:20","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-22 20:33:11","problem_types":["CWE-348","CWE-348 CWE-348: Use of Less Trusted Source"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"LOW","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-07-22T18:57:49.710450Z","id":"CVE-2026-50243","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"50243","Ordinal":"1","Title":"'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returni","CVE":"CVE-2026-50243","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"50243","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.2 up to and including 1.25.1, when Unbound is configured with the 'respip' module in front of the validator together with a 'response-ip' redirect rule or an RPZ file with an RPZ-IP trigger, the rewriting handler does not check the security status of the upstream answer and can instead rewrite a BOGUS A/AAAA answer to point to an operator's configured IP. If the validator finds an expired or otherwise invalid RRSIG on an answer whose A record falls within a 'response-ip'/RPZ configuration, the answer is still rewritten and given a hard coded security level of INSECURE. This results in the client receiving an INSECURE NOERROR reply rewritten by the operator's configured IP. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by spoofing a BOGUS A/AAAA answer that falls inside the operator's configured subnet rewrites. Such DNSSEC protected answers are then insecurely redirected to the operator's configured target.","Type":"Description","Title":"'response-ip'/'rpz' can rewrite BOGUS answers instead of returni"}]}}}