{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-23T14:18:29+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-56820","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-56820","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-56820.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56820","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56820"},"summary":{"title":"Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks","description":"Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-07-21 23:17:52","updated_at":"2026-07-22 20:35:40"},"problem_types":["CWE-295","CWE-295 CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final","name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b","name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final","name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6","name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg","name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-56820","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-56820","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"netty","product":"netty","version":"affected >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"netty","product":"netty","version":"affected < 4.1.136.Final","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"56820","cve":"CVE-2026-56820","epss":"0.002960000","percentile":"0.217270000","score_date":"2026-07-22","updated_at":"2026-07-23 00:09:29"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-56820","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-07-22T13:29:12.921481Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T13:29:45.092Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"netty","vendor":"netty","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":">= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final"},{"status":"affected","version":"< 4.1.136.Final"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-295","description":"CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-21T22:26:16.588Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/security/advisories/GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg"},{"name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/5b68c61f37aa4a3045cba624cbea239655c9003b"},{"name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/commit/bb2ff68a1fb71cb4b0eb9a9e17b66c52aff680c6"},{"name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.1.136.Final"},{"name":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/netty/netty/releases/tag/netty-4.2.16.Final"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-272m-gcwp-mpwg","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows Replay Attacks"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-56820","datePublished":"2026-07-21T22:26:16.588Z","dateReserved":"2026-06-23T14:55:09.116Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-22T13:29:45.092Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-07-21 23:17:52","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-22 20:35:40","problem_types":["CWE-295","CWE-295 CWE-295: Improper Certificate Validation"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":5.2}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-07-22T13:29:12.921481Z","id":"CVE-2026-56820","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"56820","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows ","CVE":"CVE-2026-56820","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"56820","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Netty is a network application framework for development of protocol servers and clients. In versions 4.2.0.Final through 4.2.15.Final and prior to 4.1.135.Final, `OcspClient` does not validate that the `CertificateID` in an OCSP response matches the requested `CertificateID`, which can lead to replay attack. `OcspClient.validateResponse` accepts a legitimately signed `GOOD` status response for an unrelated certificate issued by the same CA, allowing bypass of revocation checks for another certificate. This issue is fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.","Type":"Description","Title":"Netty: Missing CertificateID Validation in OCSP Response Allows "}]}}}