{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-07-15T05:58:47+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-59888","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-59888","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-59888.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59888","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59888"},"summary":{"title":"jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy","description":"jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.15.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, Java Records using a PropertyNamingStrategy can bypass @JsonIgnore because POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals() records an ignored component under its original implicit name before _renameUsing() applies the naming strategy, allowing the renamed JSON key to be assigned to the Record constructor parameter. This issue is fixed in versions 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-07-14 17:17:15","updated_at":"2026-07-14 18:18:46"},"problem_types":["CWE-915","CWE-915 CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"6.5","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","baseScore":6.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"6.5","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":6.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5974","name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5974","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/baa2cdf5ca2b2717fbb88d91955d69d8651df3e4","name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/baa2cdf5ca2b2717fbb88d91955d69d8651df3e4","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/c7c678360624da5bc7eed2152789fa522880db9d","name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/c7c678360624da5bc7eed2152789fa522880db9d","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-59888","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-59888","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"FasterXML","product":"jackson-databind","version":"affected >= 2.15.0, < 2.18.8","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"FasterXML","product":"jackson-databind","version":"affected >= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"FasterXML","product":"jackson-databind","version":"affected >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-59888","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-07-14T17:51:54.891859Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-14T17:52:03.675Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"jackson-databind","vendor":"FasterXML","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":">= 2.15.0, < 2.18.8"},{"status":"affected","version":">= 2.19.0, < 2.21.4"},{"status":"affected","version":">= 3.0.0, < 3.1.4"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.15.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, Java Records using a PropertyNamingStrategy can bypass @JsonIgnore because POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals() records an ignored component under its original implicit name before _renameUsing() applies the naming strategy, allowing the renamed JSON key to be assigned to the Record constructor parameter. This issue is fixed in versions 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":6.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-915","description":"CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-07-14T16:44:20.091Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/security/advisories/GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5"},{"name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5974","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/pull/5974"},{"name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/baa2cdf5ca2b2717fbb88d91955d69d8651df3e4","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/baa2cdf5ca2b2717fbb88d91955d69d8651df3e4"},{"name":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/c7c678360624da5bc7eed2152789fa522880db9d","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-databind/commit/c7c678360624da5bc7eed2152789fa522880db9d"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-3pjw-73gf-8qr5","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed with a PropertyNamingStrategy"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-59888","datePublished":"2026-07-14T16:44:20.091Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-07T16:40:07.983Z","dateUpdated":"2026-07-14T17:52:03.675Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-07-14 17:17:15","lastModifiedDate":"2026-07-14 18:18:46","problem_types":["CWE-915","CWE-915 CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N","baseScore":6.5,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"LOW","integrityImpact":"LOW","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":2.5}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-07-14T17:51:54.891859Z","id":"CVE-2026-59888","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"59888","Ordinal":"1","Title":"jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed w","CVE":"CVE-2026-59888","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"59888","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"jackson-databind contains the general-purpose data-binding functionality and tree-model for Jackson Data Processor. From 2.15.0 until 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4, Java Records using a PropertyNamingStrategy can bypass @JsonIgnore because POJOPropertiesCollector._removeUnwantedIgnorals() records an ignored component under its original implicit name before _renameUsing() applies the naming strategy, allowing the renamed JSON key to be assigned to the Record constructor parameter. This issue is fixed in versions 2.18.8, 2.21.4, and 3.1.4.","Type":"Description","Title":"jackson-databind: @JsonIgnore on a Record property is bypassed w"}]}}}