{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-10-31T10:48:01+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-61728","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-61728","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-61728.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-61728","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61728"},"summary":{"title":"SOCFortress CoPilot: Stored comment and SOC-field XSS permits privileged account takeover","description":"SOCFortress CoPilot focuses on providing a single pane of glass for all your security operations needs. In affected snapshots preceding the respective 0.1.70 and 0.1.76 sink repairs, portal users, including `customer_user`, can submit stored markup through `POST /api/incidents/db_operations/alert/comment`. In `customer-portal/src/components/alerts/AlertDetails/AlertComment.vue`, `commentHtml` replaces newlines in `comment.comment` but passes the result to `v-html` without escaping or sanitizing HTML. When another user views the poisoned alert, stored script executes on the application origin; the same unsanitized rendering pattern affects server-stored SOC case, asset and health-check fields in `SocCaseNote.vue`, `SocCaseItem.vue`, `SocCaseAssetsItem.vue`, `SocAlertAssetsItem.vue` and `HealthcheckItem.vue`. The authentication store in `customer-portal/src/stores/auth.ts` persists both access and refresh tokens in JavaScript-readable storage, and `customer-portal/src/api/httpClient.ts` uses bearer headers rather than HttpOnly cookies. An injected script can steal both tokens, impersonate the viewer and obtain fresh tokens through `/auth/refresh`. If an analyst or administrator views the poisoned alert or case, this enables persistent privileged account takeover, cross-tenant data access, incident modification or deletion, and detection/response subversion. The health-check sink repair is first contained in version 0.1.70, while the comment and other SOC sink repairs are first contained in version 0.1.76. Version 0.1.76 is the provisional first release containing all observed repairs; grouped versus split CVE scope requires curator adjudication.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-10-30 15:16:52","updated_at":"2026-10-30 17:13:54"},"problem_types":["CWE-79","CWE-922","CWE-79 CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')","CWE-922 CWE-922: Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"9.9","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":9.9,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"CHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"9.9","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":9.9,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"CHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/security/advisories/GHSA-8hqj-cqcc-5f6w","name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/security/advisories/GHSA-8hqj-cqcc-5f6w","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/tree/v0.1.76","name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/tree/v0.1.76","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/461e8f84794aee8ada588de3bad79430dc9f4f3d","name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/461e8f84794aee8ada588de3bad79430dc9f4f3d","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/ab9078bdee5d1c737f37f481103984665a670bdd","name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/ab9078bdee5d1c737f37f481103984665a670bdd","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/938","name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/938","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/904","name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/904","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-61728","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-61728","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"socfortress","product":"CoPilot","version":"affected < 0.1.76","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"CoPilot","vendor":"socfortress","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"< 0.1.76"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"SOCFortress CoPilot focuses on providing a single pane of glass for all your security operations needs. In affected snapshots preceding the respective 0.1.70 and 0.1.76 sink repairs, portal users, including `customer_user`, can submit stored markup through `POST /api/incidents/db_operations/alert/comment`. In `customer-portal/src/components/alerts/AlertDetails/AlertComment.vue`, `commentHtml` replaces newlines in `comment.comment` but passes the result to `v-html` without escaping or sanitizing HTML. When another user views the poisoned alert, stored script executes on the application origin; the same unsanitized rendering pattern affects server-stored SOC case, asset and health-check fields in `SocCaseNote.vue`, `SocCaseItem.vue`, `SocCaseAssetsItem.vue`, `SocAlertAssetsItem.vue` and `HealthcheckItem.vue`. The authentication store in `customer-portal/src/stores/auth.ts` persists both access and refresh tokens in JavaScript-readable storage, and `customer-portal/src/api/httpClient.ts` uses bearer headers rather than HttpOnly cookies. An injected script can steal both tokens, impersonate the viewer and obtain fresh tokens through `/auth/refresh`. If an analyst or administrator views the poisoned alert or case, this enables persistent privileged account takeover, cross-tenant data access, incident modification or deletion, and detection/response subversion. The health-check sink repair is first contained in version 0.1.70, while the comment and other SOC sink repairs are first contained in version 0.1.76. Version 0.1.76 is the provisional first release containing all observed repairs; grouped versus split CVE scope requires curator adjudication."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":9.9,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"LOW","scope":"CHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-79","description":"CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-922","description":"CWE-922: Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-10-30T14:22:18.332Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/security/advisories/GHSA-8hqj-cqcc-5f6w","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/security/advisories/GHSA-8hqj-cqcc-5f6w"},{"name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/904","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/904"},{"name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/938","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/pull/938"},{"name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/461e8f84794aee8ada588de3bad79430dc9f4f3d","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/461e8f84794aee8ada588de3bad79430dc9f4f3d"},{"name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/ab9078bdee5d1c737f37f481103984665a670bdd","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/commit/ab9078bdee5d1c737f37f481103984665a670bdd"},{"name":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/tree/v0.1.76","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/socfortress/CoPilot/tree/v0.1.76"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-8hqj-cqcc-5f6w","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"SOCFortress CoPilot: Stored comment and SOC-field XSS permits privileged account takeover"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-61728","datePublished":"2026-10-30T14:22:18.332Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-10T18:59:00.046Z","dateUpdated":"2026-10-30T14:22:18.332Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-10-30 15:16:52","lastModifiedDate":"2026-10-30 17:13:54","problem_types":["CWE-79","CWE-922","CWE-79 CWE-79: Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')","CWE-922 CWE-922: Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":9.9,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"LOW","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"CHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.1,"impactScore":6}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"61728","Ordinal":"1","Title":"SOCFortress CoPilot: Stored comment and SOC-field XSS permits pr","CVE":"CVE-2026-61728","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"61728","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"SOCFortress CoPilot focuses on providing a single pane of glass for all your security operations needs. In affected snapshots preceding the respective 0.1.70 and 0.1.76 sink repairs, portal users, including `customer_user`, can submit stored markup through `POST /api/incidents/db_operations/alert/comment`. In `customer-portal/src/components/alerts/AlertDetails/AlertComment.vue`, `commentHtml` replaces newlines in `comment.comment` but passes the result to `v-html` without escaping or sanitizing HTML. When another user views the poisoned alert, stored script executes on the application origin; the same unsanitized rendering pattern affects server-stored SOC case, asset and health-check fields in `SocCaseNote.vue`, `SocCaseItem.vue`, `SocCaseAssetsItem.vue`, `SocAlertAssetsItem.vue` and `HealthcheckItem.vue`. The authentication store in `customer-portal/src/stores/auth.ts` persists both access and refresh tokens in JavaScript-readable storage, and `customer-portal/src/api/httpClient.ts` uses bearer headers rather than HttpOnly cookies. An injected script can steal both tokens, impersonate the viewer and obtain fresh tokens through `/auth/refresh`. If an analyst or administrator views the poisoned alert or case, this enables persistent privileged account takeover, cross-tenant data access, incident modification or deletion, and detection/response subversion. The health-check sink repair is first contained in version 0.1.70, while the comment and other SOC sink repairs are first contained in version 0.1.76. Version 0.1.76 is the provisional first release containing all observed repairs; grouped versus split CVE scope requires curator adjudication.","Type":"Description","Title":"SOCFortress CoPilot: Stored comment and SOC-field XSS permits pr"}]}}}