{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-09-21T01:11:45+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-63446","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-63446","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-63446.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63446","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63446"},"summary":{"title":"Suricata app-layer: passed flows can retain transactions, causing resource exhaustion","description":"Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, AppLayerParserSetTransactionInspectId() in src/app-layer-parser.c uses an inverted guard and marks only already-inspected transactions as inspected. On flows passed by a pass rule or pass-the-flow exception policy, detection is skipped, so completed transactions remain unmarked, are never freed, and are repeatedly rescanned. The per-flow list can grow without bound with quadratic cleanup cost, causing CPU and memory exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"GitHub_M","published_at":"2026-09-18 21:17:03","updated_at":"2026-09-18 21:17:03"},"problem_types":["CWE-401","CWE-407","CWE-401 CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime","CWE-407 CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"DECLARED","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/15726","name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/15726","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8628","name":"https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8628","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/60a83c62a1dfdfb589b2bad27fb7fc339fc964b7","name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/60a83c62a1dfdfb589b2bad27fb7fc339fc964b7","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.6","name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.6","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-gjwr-75gq-877m","name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-gjwr-75gq-877m","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/006e21c1ccc38c1c815e7945d54b4638cc5f0de8","name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/006e21c1ccc38c1c815e7945d54b4638cc5f0de8","refsource":"security-advisories@github.com","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63446","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63446","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"OISF","product":"suricata","version":"affected >= 8.0.0, < 8.0.6","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"63446","cve":"CVE-2026-63446","epss":"0.003880000","percentile":"0.327560000","score_date":"2026-09-20","updated_at":"2026-09-21 00:10:08"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"product":"suricata","vendor":"OISF","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":">= 8.0.0, < 8.0.6"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, AppLayerParserSetTransactionInspectId() in src/app-layer-parser.c uses an inverted guard and marks only already-inspected transactions as inspected. On flows passed by a pass rule or pass-the-flow exception policy, detection is skipped, so completed transactions remain unmarked, are never freed, and are repeatedly rescanned. The per-flow list can grow without bound with quadratic cleanup cost, causing CPU and memory exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-401","description":"CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-407","description":"CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-18T20:22:15.562Z","orgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","shortName":"GitHub_M"},"references":[{"name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-gjwr-75gq-877m","tags":["x_refsource_CONFIRM"],"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-gjwr-75gq-877m"},{"name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/15726","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/pull/15726"},{"name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/006e21c1ccc38c1c815e7945d54b4638cc5f0de8","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/006e21c1ccc38c1c815e7945d54b4638cc5f0de8"},{"name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/60a83c62a1dfdfb589b2bad27fb7fc339fc964b7","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/commit/60a83c62a1dfdfb589b2bad27fb7fc339fc964b7"},{"name":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.6","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://github.com/OISF/suricata/releases/tag/suricata-8.0.6"},{"name":"https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8628","tags":["x_refsource_MISC"],"url":"https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8628"}],"source":{"advisory":"GHSA-gjwr-75gq-877m","discovery":"UNKNOWN"},"title":"Suricata app-layer: passed flows can retain transactions, causing resource exhaustion"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa","assignerShortName":"GitHub_M","cveId":"CVE-2026-63446","datePublished":"2026-09-18T20:22:15.562Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-16T19:35:57.767Z","dateUpdated":"2026-09-18T20:22:15.562Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-09-18 21:17:03","lastModifiedDate":"2026-09-18 21:17:03","problem_types":["CWE-401","CWE-407","CWE-401 CWE-401: Missing Release of Memory after Effective Lifetime","CWE-407 CWE-407: Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"security-advisories@github.com","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"63446","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Suricata app-layer: passed flows can retain transactions, causin","CVE":"CVE-2026-63446","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"63446","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. From 8.0.0 until 8.0.6, AppLayerParserSetTransactionInspectId() in src/app-layer-parser.c uses an inverted guard and marks only already-inspected transactions as inspected. On flows passed by a pass rule or pass-the-flow exception policy, detection is skipped, so completed transactions remain unmarked, are never freed, and are repeatedly rescanned. The per-flow list can grow without bound with quadratic cleanup cost, causing CPU and memory exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.6.","Type":"Description","Title":"Suricata app-layer: passed flows can retain transactions, causin"}]}}}