{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-08-05T05:15:02+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-66883","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-66883","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-66883.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66883","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-66883"},"summary":{"title":"Oidcc.Plug.Authorize user agent session binding inert due to case-sensitive header lookup","description":"Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.Authorize module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex and lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex, and program routines Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 and Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2.\n\nOidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 reads the initiating client's user agent with get_req_header(conn, \"User-Agent\"). Plug lowercases incoming header names, but get_req_header/2 matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and nil is written into the session. On the callback side, Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback treats a stored nil user agent as nothing to compare and returns :ok without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with check_useragent: true, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.\n\nThe impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; it removes one layer that would otherwise hinder use of a stolen or leaked session, such as an exfiltrated session cookie replayed from a different client. The CSRF/state, nonce, and PKCE checks are unaffected and continue to function. Deployments that never enabled check_useragent are not affected in practice, since they never expected the binding. The corresponding lookup in Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback correctly uses the lowercase key and is not affected.\n\nThis issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.1.0-alpha.3 before 0.5.0.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"EEF","published_at":"2026-08-04 12:16:36","updated_at":"2026-08-04 14:52:54"},"problem_types":["CWE-178","CWE-178 CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","score":"6.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"6.3","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-66883.html","name":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-66883.html","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/security/advisories/GHSA-w5r8-m75h-98fc","name":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/security/advisories/GHSA-w5r8-m75h-98fc","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-66883","name":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-66883","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/commit/f15e52c5750aaba701104b10ed96cfac063bd557","name":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/commit/f15e52c5750aaba701104b10ed96cfac063bd557","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-66883","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-66883","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Erlang Ecosystem Foundation","product":"oidcc_plug","version":"affected 0.1.0-alpha.3 0.5.0 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Erlang Ecosystem Foundation","product":"oidcc_plug","version":"affected 0a75fb139d8e2686d1b75e0d48962323d2181673 f15e52c5750aaba701104b10ed96cfac063bd557 git","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Mathias Polligkeit","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Mathias Polligkeit","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-66883","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-08-04T12:27:16.535019Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-04T12:27:58.024Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/security/advisories/GHSA-w5r8-m75h-98fc"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"collectionURL":"https://repo.hex.pm","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:erlef:oidcc_plug:*:*:*:*:*:erlang:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.Authorize","Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback"],"packageName":"oidcc_plug","packageURL":"pkg:hex/oidcc_plug","product":"oidcc_plug","programFiles":["lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex","lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"'Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.Authorize':call/2"},{"name":"'Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback':call/2"}],"repo":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug","vendor":"Erlang Ecosystem Foundation","versions":[{"lessThan":"0.5.0","status":"affected","version":"0.1.0-alpha.3","versionType":"semver"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://github.com","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:erlef:oidcc_plug:*:*:*:*:*:erlang:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.Authorize","Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback"],"packageName":"erlef/oidcc_plug","packageURL":"pkg:github/erlef/oidcc_plug","product":"oidcc_plug","programFiles":["lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex","lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"'Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.Authorize':call/2"},{"name":"'Elixir.Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback':call/2"}],"repo":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug","vendor":"Erlang Ecosystem Foundation","versions":[{"lessThan":"f15e52c5750aaba701104b10ed96cfac063bd557","status":"affected","version":"0a75fb139d8e2686d1b75e0d48962323d2181673","versionType":"git"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:erlef:oidcc_plug:*:*:*:*:*:erlang:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"0.5.0","versionStartIncluding":"0.1.0-alpha.3","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}],"operator":"AND"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Mathias Polligkeit"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation developer","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation reviewer","value":"Mathias Polligkeit"},{"lang":"en","type":"coordinator","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"<p>Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (<code>Oidcc.Plug.Authorize</code> module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.</p>\n<p>This vulnerability is associated with program files <code>lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex</code> and <code>lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex</code>, and program routines <code>Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2</code> and <code>Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2</code>.</p>\n<p><code>Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2</code> reads the initiating client's user agent with <code>get_req_header(conn, \"User-Agent\")</code>. Plug lowercases incoming header names, but <code>get_req_header/2</code> matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and <code>nil</code> is written into the session. On the callback side, <code>Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback</code> treats a stored <code>nil</code> user agent as nothing to compare and returns <code>:ok</code> without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with <code>check_useragent: true</code>, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.</p>\n<p>The impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; it removes one layer that would otherwise hinder use of a stolen or leaked session, such as an exfiltrated session cookie replayed from a different client. The CSRF/state, nonce, and PKCE checks are unaffected and continue to function. Deployments that never enabled <code>check_useragent</code> are not affected in practice, since they never expected the binding. The corresponding lookup in <code>Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback</code> correctly uses the lowercase key and is not affected.</p>\n<p>This issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.1.0-alpha.3 before 0.5.0.</p>"},{"base64":false,"type":"text/markdown","value":"Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (`Oidcc.Plug.Authorize` module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files `lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex` and `lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex`, and program routines `Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2` and `Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2`.\n\n`Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2` reads the initiating client's user agent with `get_req_header(conn, \"User-Agent\")`. Plug lowercases incoming header names, but `get_req_header/2` matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and `nil` is written into the session. On the callback side, `Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback` treats a stored `nil` user agent as nothing to compare and returns `:ok` without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with `check_useragent: true`, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.\n\nThe impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; it removes one layer that would otherwise hinder use of a stolen or leaked session, such as an exfiltrated session cookie replayed from a different client. The CSRF/state, nonce, and PKCE checks are unaffected and continue to function. Deployments that never enabled `check_useragent` are not affected in practice, since they never expected the binding. The corresponding lookup in `Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback` correctly uses the lowercase key and is not affected.\n\nThis issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.1.0-alpha.3 before 0.5.0."}],"value":"Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.Authorize module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex and lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex, and program routines Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 and Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2.\n\nOidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 reads the initiating client's user agent with get_req_header(conn, \"User-Agent\"). Plug lowercases incoming header names, but get_req_header/2 matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and nil is written into the session. On the callback side, Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback treats a stored nil user agent as nothing to compare and returns :ok without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with check_useragent: true, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.\n\nThe impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; it removes one layer that would otherwise hinder use of a stolen or leaked session, such as an exfiltrated session cookie replayed from a different client. The CSRF/state, nonce, and PKCE checks are unaffected and continue to function. Deployments that never enabled check_useragent are not affected in practice, since they never expected the binding. The corresponding lookup in Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback correctly uses the lowercase key and is not affected.\n\nThis issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.1.0-alpha.3 before 0.5.0."}],"impacts":[{"capecId":"CAPEC-60","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"CAPEC-60 Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay)"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-178","description":"CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-04T11:46:05.191Z","orgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","shortName":"EEF"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory","related"],"url":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/security/advisories/GHSA-w5r8-m75h-98fc"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-66883.html"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-66883"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/erlef/oidcc_plug/commit/f15e52c5750aaba701104b10ed96cfac063bd557"}],"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"title":"Oidcc.Plug.Authorize user agent session binding inert due to case-sensitive header lookup"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","assignerShortName":"EEF","cveId":"CVE-2026-66883","datePublished":"2026-08-04T11:46:05.191Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-28T04:15:10.240Z","dateUpdated":"2026-08-04T12:27:58.024Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-08-04 12:16:36","lastModifiedDate":"2026-08-04 14:52:54","problem_types":["CWE-178","CWE-178 CWE-178 Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":6.3,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"LOW","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-08-04T12:27:16.535019Z","id":"CVE-2026-66883","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"66883","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Oidcc.Plug.Authorize user agent session binding inert due to cas","CVE":"CVE-2026-66883","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"66883","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.Authorize module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session.\n\nThis vulnerability is associated with program files lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex and lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex, and program routines Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 and Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2.\n\nOidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 reads the initiating client's user agent with get_req_header(conn, \"User-Agent\"). Plug lowercases incoming header names, but get_req_header/2 matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and nil is written into the session. On the callback side, Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback treats a stored nil user agent as nothing to compare and returns :ok without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with check_useragent: true, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent.\n\nThe impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; it removes one layer that would otherwise hinder use of a stolen or leaked session, such as an exfiltrated session cookie replayed from a different client. The CSRF/state, nonce, and PKCE checks are unaffected and continue to function. Deployments that never enabled check_useragent are not affected in practice, since they never expected the binding. The corresponding lookup in Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback correctly uses the lowercase key and is not affected.\n\nThis issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.1.0-alpha.3 before 0.5.0.","Type":"Description","Title":"Oidcc.Plug.Authorize user agent session binding inert due to cas"}]}}}