{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-09-06T09:09:44+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-67276","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-67276","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-67276.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67276","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67276"},"summary":{"title":"SSH user impersonation possible in Mikrotik RouterOS","description":"RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the key type and modulus but omitting the exponent. Because signature verification uses the client-supplied key, an attacker knowing an authorized RSA modulus can supply a key with exponent one, forge a valid signature, and open an SSH command channel as the target user without the private key.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"CERT-PL","published_at":"2026-09-05 20:17:17","updated_at":"2026-09-05 21:16:49"},"problem_types":["CWE-347","CWE-347 CWE-347 Improper verification of cryptographic signature"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"cvd@cert.pl","type":"Secondary","score":"9.2","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":9.2,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"9.2","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":9.2,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/mikrotik-routeros-cve","name":"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/mikrotik-routeros-cve","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://npratley.net/reversing-mikrotiks-silent-patch-the-routeros-7-23-4-fix-they-wouldnt-explain/","name":"https://npratley.net/reversing-mikrotiks-silent-patch-the-routeros-7-23-4-fix-they-wouldnt-explain/","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/6-49-21-long-term-is-released/272802","name":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/6-49-21-long-term-is-released/272802","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/vulnerabilities-in-mikrotik-routeros-actively-exploited/","name":"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/vulnerabilities-in-mikrotik-routeros-actively-exploited/","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-23-4-long-term-is-released/272801","name":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-23-4-long-term-is-released/272801","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-24-2-stable-is-released/272800","name":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-24-2-stable-is-released/272800","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://mikrotik.com/supportsec/september-2026-vulnerability/","name":"https://mikrotik.com/supportsec/september-2026-vulnerability/","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-67276","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67276","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Mikrotik","product":"RouterOS","version":"affected 7.24 7.24.2 custom","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Mikrotik","product":"RouterOS","version":"affected 7.0.0 7.23.4 custom","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Mikrotik","product":"RouterOS","version":"affected 6.0.0 6.49.21 custom","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Sławomir Rozbicki (CERT.PL)","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"RouterOS","vendor":"Mikrotik","versions":[{"lessThan":"7.24.2","status":"affected","version":"7.24","versionType":"custom"},{"lessThan":"7.23.4","status":"affected","version":"7.0.0","versionType":"custom"},{"lessThan":"6.49.21","status":"affected","version":"6.0.0","versionType":"custom"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:mikrotik:routeros:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.24.2","versionStartIncluding":"7.24","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:mikrotik:routeros:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.23.4","versionStartIncluding":"7.0.0","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:mikrotik:routeros:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"6.49.21","versionStartIncluding":"6.0.0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}],"operator":"OR"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Sławomir Rozbicki (CERT.PL)"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the key type and modulus but omitting the exponent. Because signature verification uses the client-supplied key, an attacker knowing an authorized RSA modulus can supply a key with exponent one, forge a valid signature, and open an SSH command channel as the target user without the private key.<div>This issue was fixed in versions:&nbsp;6.49.21 (Long-term),&nbsp;7.23.4 (Long-term)&nbsp;and&nbsp;7.24.2 (Stable)</div>"}],"value":"RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the key type and modulus but omitting the exponent. Because signature verification uses the client-supplied key, an attacker knowing an authorized RSA modulus can supply a key with exponent one, forge a valid signature, and open an SSH command channel as the target user without the private key.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)"}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":9.2,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-347","description":"CWE-347 Improper verification of cryptographic signature","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-05T20:39:06.278Z","orgId":"4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6","shortName":"CERT-PL"},"references":[{"tags":["third-party-advisory"],"url":"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/mikrotik-routeros-cve"},{"tags":["technical-description"],"url":"https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/vulnerabilities-in-mikrotik-routeros-actively-exploited/"},{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://npratley.net/reversing-mikrotiks-silent-patch-the-routeros-7-23-4-fix-they-wouldnt-explain/"},{"tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://mikrotik.com/supportsec/september-2026-vulnerability/"},{"tags":["release-notes"],"url":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/6-49-21-long-term-is-released/272802"},{"tags":["release-notes"],"url":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-23-4-long-term-is-released/272801"},{"tags":["release-notes"],"url":"https://forum.mikrotik.com/t/7-24-2-stable-is-released/272800"}],"source":{"discovery":"INTERNAL"},"title":"SSH user impersonation possible in Mikrotik RouterOS","x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 1.0.3"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6","assignerShortName":"CERT-PL","cveId":"CVE-2026-67276","datePublished":"2026-09-05T20:00:55.811Z","dateReserved":"2026-07-29T11:59:30.538Z","dateUpdated":"2026-09-05T20:39:06.278Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-09-05 20:17:17","lastModifiedDate":"2026-09-05 21:16:49","problem_types":["CWE-347","CWE-347 CWE-347 Improper verification of cryptographic signature"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"cvd@cert.pl","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":9.2,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"HIGH","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"67276","Ordinal":"1","Title":"SSH user impersonation possible in Mikrotik RouterOS","CVE":"CVE-2026-67276","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"67276","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"RouterOS does not compare the complete RSA public key when matching an SSH authentication request to an authorized user key, checking the key type and modulus but omitting the exponent. Because signature verification uses the client-supplied key, an attacker knowing an authorized RSA modulus can supply a key with exponent one, forge a valid signature, and open an SSH command channel as the target user without the private key.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)","Type":"Description","Title":"SSH user impersonation possible in Mikrotik RouterOS"}]}}}