{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-08-15T15:08:02+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-74568","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-74568","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-74568.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74568","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74568"},"summary":{"title":"KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration","description":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration\n\nFix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and\nevicting that structure from the LPI xarray.\n\nLPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa).\nWhen the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero,\nvgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and\nfrees it under the xarray lock.\n\nHowever, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI\nre-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU,\nsince the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed\nin a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a\nDISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending\nlist (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.\n\nParticularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct\npaths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result\nin deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false\n                        new IRQ inserted -->  __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n  xa_lock_irqsave();\n  vgic_release_lpi_locked()\n      __xa_erase(.., irq->intid)   <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased\n      kfree_rcu(old_irq)\n\nDuring the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq_norelease()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n      irq->pending_release = true\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false\n                 BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n\n  vgic_release_deleted_lpis()\n      xa_lock_irqsave()\n      xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true\n                               is gone, so it cannot be released\n\nTo fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside\nthe xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the\nto-be-released LPI.\n\nIn the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw\nspinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution\ndoes not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts\nan LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it.\nConsequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred\nrelease drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no\nlonger safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on\ntheir refcount.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"Linux","published_at":"2026-08-15 13:18:02","updated_at":"2026-08-15 13:18:02"},"problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d","name":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d","refsource":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-74568","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-74568","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a 292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52 git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d git","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"affected 6.17","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 6.17 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 7.1.8 7.1.* semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Linux","product":"Linux","version":"unaffected 7.2-rc6 * original_commit_for_fix","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c","arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c","include/kvm/arm_vgic.h"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"lessThan":"292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52","status":"affected","version":"3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a","versionType":"git"},{"lessThan":"cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d","status":"affected","version":"3a08a6ca7c373198c84e2a8c025c395ee966ff8a","versionType":"git"}]},{"defaultStatus":"affected","product":"Linux","programFiles":["arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c","arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c","include/kvm/arm_vgic.h"],"repo":"https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git","vendor":"Linux","versions":[{"status":"affected","version":"6.17"},{"lessThan":"6.17","status":"unaffected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"7.1.*","status":"unaffected","version":"7.1.8","versionType":"semver"},{"lessThanOrEqual":"*","status":"unaffected","version":"7.2-rc6","versionType":"original_commit_for_fix"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.1.8","versionStartIncluding":"6.17","vulnerable":true},{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"7.2-rc6","versionStartIncluding":"6.17","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration\n\nFix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and\nevicting that structure from the LPI xarray.\n\nLPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa).\nWhen the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero,\nvgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and\nfrees it under the xarray lock.\n\nHowever, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI\nre-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU,\nsince the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed\nin a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a\nDISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending\nlist (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.\n\nParticularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct\npaths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result\nin deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false\n                        new IRQ inserted -->  __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n  xa_lock_irqsave();\n  vgic_release_lpi_locked()\n      __xa_erase(.., irq->intid)   <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased\n      kfree_rcu(old_irq)\n\nDuring the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq_norelease()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n      irq->pending_release = true\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false\n                 BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n\n  vgic_release_deleted_lpis()\n      xa_lock_irqsave()\n      xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true\n                               is gone, so it cannot be released\n\nTo fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside\nthe xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the\nto-be-released LPI.\n\nIn the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw\nspinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution\ndoes not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts\nan LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it.\nConsequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred\nrelease drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no\nlonger safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on\ntheir refcount."}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-08-15T12:28:08.859Z","orgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","shortName":"Linux"},"references":[{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52"},{"url":"https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d"}],"title":"KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration","x_generator":{"engine":"bippy-1.2.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67","assignerShortName":"Linux","cveId":"CVE-2026-74568","datePublished":"2026-08-15T12:28:08.859Z","dateReserved":"2026-08-15T05:44:03.917Z","dateUpdated":"2026-08-15T12:28:08.859Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-08-15 13:18:02","lastModifiedDate":"2026-08-15 13:18:02","problem_types":[],"metrics":[],"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"74568","Ordinal":"1","Title":"KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registrati","CVE":"CVE-2026-74568","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"74568","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nKVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration\n\nFix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and\nevicting that structure from the LPI xarray.\n\nLPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa).\nWhen the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero,\nvgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and\nfrees it under the xarray lock.\n\nHowever, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI\nre-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU,\nsince the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed\nin a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a\nDISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending\nlist (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.\n\nParticularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct\npaths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result\nin deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false\n                        new IRQ inserted -->  __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n  xa_lock_irqsave();\n  vgic_release_lpi_locked()\n      __xa_erase(.., irq->intid)   <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased\n      kfree_rcu(old_irq)\n\nDuring the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:\n\n  CPU0 (Releasing LPI)                    CPU1 (Adding new LPI)\n  ====================                    =====================\n  vgic_put_irq_norelease()\n      __vgic_put_irq()\n          refcount_dec_and_test()\n      irq->pending_release = true\n                                          vgic_add_lpi()\n                                              xa_lock_irqsave()\n                                              old_irq = xa_load(.., intid)\n                                              vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false\n                 BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..)\n                                              xa_unlock_irqrestore()\n\n  vgic_release_deleted_lpis()\n      xa_lock_irqsave()\n      xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true\n                               is gone, so it cannot be released\n\nTo fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside\nthe xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the\nto-be-released LPI.\n\nIn the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw\nspinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution\ndoes not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts\nan LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it.\nConsequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred\nrelease drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no\nlonger safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update\nvgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on\ntheir refcount.","Type":"Description","Title":"KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registrati"}]}}}