{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-10-01T20:32:28+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-81634","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-81634","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-81634.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-81634","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81634"},"summary":{"title":"Possible heap buffer overflow during DNSSEC canonicalization","description":"In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including 1.26.0, a 255 length query name with a large TCP response can lead to a heap buffer overflow during the RRSet canonicalisation routine. This is caused by missing to add the first owner name into the buffer length check. A malicious actor operating a malicious name server or tampering with an incoming response to Unbound (canonicalisation happens before DNSSEC validation), can trigger the vulnerability.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"NLnet Labs","published_at":"2026-09-16 09:17:06","updated_at":"2026-09-23 19:51:14"},"problem_types":["CWE-122","CWE-122 CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","type":"Secondary","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"7.5","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","data":{"baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-81634.txt","name":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-81634.txt","refsource":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","tags":["Patch","Vendor Advisory"],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-81634","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81634","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"NLnet Labs","product":"Unbound","version":"affected 1.26.1 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Issue reported by Vlatko Kosturjak"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-08-03T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"NLnet Labs shares patch"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Vlatko Kosturjak verifies patch"},{"source":"CNA","time":"2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z","lang":"en","value":"Fixes released with version 1.26.1"}],"solutions":[{"source":"CNA","title":"","value":"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.26.1","time":"","lang":"en"}],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Vlatko Kosturjak (Marlink Cyber)","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"81634","vulnerable":"1","versionEndIncluding":"","cpe1":"cpe","cpe2":"2.3","cpe3":"a","cpe4":"nlnetlabs","cpe5":"unbound","cpe6":"*","cpe7":"*","cpe8":"*","cpe9":"*","cpe10":"*","cpe11":"*","cpe12":"*","cpe13":"*"}],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"81634","cve":"CVE-2026-81634","epss":"0.004580000","percentile":"0.369590000","score_date":"2026-09-24","updated_at":"2026-09-25 00:02:55"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-81634","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-09-16T14:32:31.803030Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-16T14:32:38.842Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Unbound","vendor":"NLnet Labs","versions":[{"lessThan":"1.26.1","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Vlatko Kosturjak (Marlink Cyber)"}],"datePublic":"2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including 1.26.0, a 255 length query name with a large TCP response can lead to a heap buffer overflow during the RRSet canonicalisation routine. This is caused by missing to add the first owner name into the buffer length check. A malicious actor operating a malicious name server or tampering with an incoming response to Unbound (canonicalisation happens before DNSSEC validation), can trigger the vulnerability."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-122","description":"CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-16T08:30:15.428Z","orgId":"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6","shortName":"NLnet Labs"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/downloads/unbound/CVE-2026-81634.txt"}],"solutions":[{"lang":"en","value":"This issue is fixed starting with version 1.26.1"}],"timeline":[{"lang":"en","time":"2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Issue reported by Vlatko Kosturjak"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-08-03T00:00:00.000Z","value":"NLnet Labs shares patch"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Vlatko Kosturjak verifies patch"},{"lang":"en","time":"2026-09-16T00:00:00.000Z","value":"Fixes released with version 1.26.1"}],"title":"Possible heap buffer overflow during DNSSEC canonicalization","x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"206fc3a0-e175-490b-9eaa-a5738056c9f6","assignerShortName":"NLnet Labs","cveId":"CVE-2026-81634","datePublished":"2026-09-16T08:30:15.428Z","dateReserved":"2026-09-07T14:06:21.967Z","dateUpdated":"2026-09-16T14:32:38.842Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-09-16 09:17:06","lastModifiedDate":"2026-09-23 19:51:14","problem_types":["CWE-122","CWE-122 CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"sep@nlnetlabs.nl","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H","baseScore":7.5,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"NONE","integrityImpact":"NONE","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":3.9,"impactScore":3.6}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-09-16T14:32:31.803030Z","id":"CVE-2026-81634","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"yes"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[{"nodes":[{"operator":"OR","negate":false,"cpeMatch":[{"vulnerable":true,"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:nlnetlabs:unbound:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"1.26.1","matchCriteriaId":"EFE466C2-2830-48B5-AD1D-0138CB8207A7"}]}]}]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"81634","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Possible heap buffer overflow during DNSSEC canonicalization","CVE":"CVE-2026-81634","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"81634","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"In NLnet Labs Unbound up to and including 1.26.0, a 255 length query name with a large TCP response can lead to a heap buffer overflow during the RRSet canonicalisation routine. This is caused by missing to add the first owner name into the buffer length check. A malicious actor operating a malicious name server or tampering with an incoming response to Unbound (canonicalisation happens before DNSSEC validation), can trigger the vulnerability.","Type":"Description","Title":"Possible heap buffer overflow during DNSSEC canonicalization"}]}}}