{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-09-14T07:36:51+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-82746","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-82746","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-82746.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82746","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82746"},"summary":{"title":"Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorization, allowing updates to forbidden records","description":"Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of Ash.update_many/4.\n\nAsh.update_many/4 runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer update_many, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany (lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex) took that path even under authorize?: true without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"EEF","published_at":"2026-09-01 04:18:04","updated_at":"2026-09-01 21:15:00"},"problem_types":["CWE-862","CWE-862 CWE-862 Missing Authorization"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","score":"5.9","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"5.9","severity":"MEDIUM","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"LOCAL","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/ed4e656822ffe83f8e960d5de0b573c0d1ae7f29","name":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/ed4e656822ffe83f8e960d5de0b573c0d1ae7f29","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82746","name":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82746","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82746.html","name":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82746.html","refsource":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j7c9-3fw3-jc64","name":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j7c9-3fw3-jc64","refsource":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82746","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82746","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"ash-project","product":"ash","version":"affected 3.29.0 3.32.2 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"ash-project","product":"ash","version":"affected 45e6b4ec7b2dc076afe614aa7aef7e1f15b5e335 ed4e656822ffe83f8e960d5de0b573c0d1ae7f29 git","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Zach Daniel / Ash Project","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Peter Ullrich","lang":"en"},{"source":"CNA","value":"Peter Ullrich","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"82746","cve":"CVE-2026-82746","epss":"0.001200000","percentile":"0.020120000","score_date":"2026-09-03","updated_at":"2026-09-04 00:08:06"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-82746","options":[{"Exploitation":"poc"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-09-01T15:16:54.224249Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-01T15:17:12.056Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"references":[{"tags":["exploit"],"url":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j7c9-3fw3-jc64"}],"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"collectionURL":"https://repo.hex.pm","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["'Elixir.Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany'"],"packageName":"ash","packageURL":"pkg:hex/ash","product":"ash","programFiles":["lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"'Elixir.Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany':run/5"}],"repo":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash","vendor":"ash-project","versions":[{"lessThan":"3.32.2","status":"affected","version":"3.29.0","versionType":"semver"}]},{"collectionURL":"https://github.com","cpes":["cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"],"defaultStatus":"unaffected","modules":["'Elixir.Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany'"],"packageName":"ash-project/ash","packageURL":"pkg:github/ash-project/ash","product":"ash","programFiles":["lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex"],"programRoutines":[{"name":"'Elixir.Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany':run/5"}],"repo":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash","vendor":"ash-project","versions":[{"lessThan":"ed4e656822ffe83f8e960d5de0b573c0d1ae7f29","status":"affected","version":"45e6b4ec7b2dc076afe614aa7aef7e1f15b5e335","versionType":"git"}]}],"cpeApplicability":[{"nodes":[{"cpeMatch":[{"criteria":"cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","versionEndExcluding":"3.32.2","versionStartIncluding":"3.29.0","vulnerable":true}],"negate":false,"operator":"OR"}],"operator":"AND"}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"coordinator","value":"Jonatan Männchen / EEF"},{"lang":"en","type":"remediation developer","value":"Zach Daniel / Ash Project"},{"lang":"en","type":"reporter","value":"Peter Ullrich"},{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Peter Ullrich"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"<p>Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of <code>Ash.update_many/4</code>.</p>\n<p><code>Ash.update_many/4</code> runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer <code>update_many</code>, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. <code>Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany</code> (<code>lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex</code>) took that path even under <code>authorize?: true</code> without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows.</p>\n<p>This issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2.</p>"},{"base64":false,"type":"text/markdown","value":"Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of `Ash.update_many/4`.\n\n`Ash.update_many/4` runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer `update_many`, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. `Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany` (`lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex`) took that path even under `authorize?: true` without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2."}],"value":"Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of Ash.update_many/4.\n\nAsh.update_many/4 runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer update_many, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany (lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex) took that path even under authorize?: true without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2."}],"impacts":[{"capecId":"CAPEC-1","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"CAPEC-1 Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","attackVector":"LOCAL","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-862","description":"CWE-862 Missing Authorization","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-01T03:47:14.278Z","orgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","shortName":"EEF"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory","related"],"url":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/security/advisories/GHSA-j7c9-3fw3-jc64"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-82746.html"},{"tags":["related"],"url":"https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-82746"},{"tags":["patch"],"url":"https://github.com/ash-project/ash/commit/ed4e656822ffe83f8e960d5de0b573c0d1ae7f29"}],"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"title":"Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorization, allowing updates to forbidden records"}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","assignerShortName":"EEF","cveId":"CVE-2026-82746","datePublished":"2026-09-01T03:47:14.278Z","dateReserved":"2026-08-31T01:00:09.774Z","dateUpdated":"2026-09-01T15:17:12.056Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-09-01 04:18:04","lastModifiedDate":"2026-09-01 21:15:00","problem_types":["CWE-862","CWE-862 CWE-862 Missing Authorization"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49db","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":5.9,"baseSeverity":"MEDIUM","attackVector":"LOCAL","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"PRESENT","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-09-01T15:16:54.224249Z","id":"CVE-2026-82746","options":[{"exploitation":"poc"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"partial"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"82746","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorizatio","CVE":"CVE-2026-82746","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"82746","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Missing Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an actor to update records forbidden by resource policies through the atomic path of Ash.update_many/4.\n\nAsh.update_many/4 runs as a single atomic statement (a data-layer update_many, for example a SQL MERGE) whenever an atomic strategy is used and the data layer supports it. Ash.Actions.Update.UpdateMany (lib/ash/actions/update/update_many.ex) took that path even under authorize?: true without applying the resource's policies, so the statement updated every row matched by primary key regardless of the policy filter that authorization would impose. An actor could therefore update records the policies forbid, such as rows belonging to another actor or tenant. The fix restricts the atomic path to data layers supporting changeset filters when authorizing, authorizes each changeset, and merges the resulting policy filter into each changeset so the statement only touches authorized rows.\n\nThis issue affects ash: from 3.29.0 before 3.32.2.","Type":"Description","Title":"Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorizatio"}]}}}