{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-10-27T13:17:18+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-82944","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-82944","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-82944.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82944","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82944"},"summary":{"title":"Buffer Overflow in CoE SDO Upload Multi-Segment Data Transfers","description":"SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn't track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"ENISA","published_at":"2026-10-26 09:16:36","updated_at":"2026-10-26 13:45:21"},"problem_types":["CWE-120","CWE-131","CWE-787","CWE-787 CWE-787 Out-of-bounds write","CWE-131 CWE-131 Incorrect calculation of buffer size","CWE-120 CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (‘Classic Buffer Overflow’)"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158","type":"Secondary","score":"8.8","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":8.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"ADJACENT_NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"8.8","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","data":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"ADJACENT_NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":8.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://rt-labs.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/RRTL-260921-01.pdf","name":"https://rt-labs.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/RRTL-260921-01.pdf","refsource":"a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-82944","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-82944","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"RT-Labs AB","product":"SOEM","version":"affected 2.0.1 semver","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"3ntr0py1337 / LeetProtect Research, Akhil Koul, Mayur Agnihotri","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":null,"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"SOEM","vendor":"RT-Labs AB","versions":[{"lessThan":"2.0.1","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"3ntr0py1337 / LeetProtect Research, Akhil Koul, Mayur Agnihotri"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn't track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution."}],"value":"SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn't track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"LOW","attackVector":"ADJACENT_NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"HIGH","baseScore":8.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-787","description":"CWE-787 Out-of-bounds write","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-131","description":"CWE-131 Incorrect calculation of buffer size","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-120","description":"CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (‘Classic Buffer Overflow’)","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-10-26T08:47:50.412Z","orgId":"a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158","shortName":"ENISA"},"references":[{"tags":["vendor-advisory"],"url":"https://rt-labs.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/RRTL-260921-01.pdf"}],"title":"Buffer Overflow in CoE SDO Upload Multi-Segment Data Transfers","x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 1.0.5"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158","assignerShortName":"ENISA","cveId":"CVE-2026-82944","datePublished":"2026-10-26T08:47:50.412Z","dateReserved":"2026-08-31T12:26:22.054Z","dateUpdated":"2026-10-26T08:47:50.412Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-10-26 09:16:36","lastModifiedDate":"2026-10-26 13:45:21","problem_types":["CWE-120","CWE-131","CWE-787","CWE-787 CWE-787 Out-of-bounds write","CWE-131 CWE-131 Incorrect calculation of buffer size","CWE-120 CWE-120 Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input (‘Classic Buffer Overflow’)"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H","baseScore":8.8,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"ADJACENT_NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"HIGH"},"exploitabilityScore":2.8,"impactScore":5.9}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"82944","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Buffer Overflow in CoE SDO Upload Multi-Segment Data Transfers","CVE":"CVE-2026-82944","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"82944","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"SOEM version 2.0.0 and earlier contains a vulnerability in multi-segment data transfers where a malicious device can overflow memory buffers. The software checks the total size only once at the beginning, but doesn't track the cumulative size as multiple segments arrive. An attacker can declare a small initial size to pass validation, then send additional segments that exceed the allocated buffer. This allows the attacker to write controlled data beyond buffer boundaries, potentially enabling code execution.","Type":"Description","Title":"Buffer Overflow in CoE SDO Upload Multi-Segment Data Transfers"}]}}}