{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-09-05T20:56:34+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-85525","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-85525","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-85525.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-85525","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85525"},"summary":{"title":"Improper OCSP response validation in Snowflake drivers","description":"Improper OCSP response validation in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, and Node.js drivers allowed a revoked TLS certificate to be accepted as valid, because OCSP responses were not reliably bound to the certificate being validated and definitive verification failures were treated as transient. A man-in-the-middle attacker holding a revoked certificate and its private key for a Snowflake or stage hostname could cause the driver to establish a TLS session to the attacker-controlled endpoint anyway, allowing the attacker to read and modify data transmitted within that connection. Successful exploitation requires that on-path position and the corresponding private key, and impact is limited to data carried within the intercepted connection. The fix is available in the patched versions listed above. Users must manually upgrade.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"SNOWFLAKE","published_at":"2026-09-04 09:17:11","updated_at":"2026-09-04 20:17:32"},"problem_types":["CWE-295","CWE-347","CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation","CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"],"metrics":[{"version":"3.1","source":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","type":"Secondary","score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","data":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"}},{"version":"3.1","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"7.4","severity":"HIGH","vector":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","data":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/jdbc-2026","name":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/jdbc-2026","refsource":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/golang-2026","name":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/golang-2026","refsource":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/nodejs-2026","name":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/nodejs-2026","refsource":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://github.com/snowflakedb/snowflake-connector-python/releases/tag/v4.7.3","name":"https://github.com/snowflakedb/snowflake-connector-python/releases/tag/v4.7.3","refsource":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-85525","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-85525","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Snowflake","product":"Snowflake Connector for Python","version":"affected 4.7.3 python","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Snowflake","product":"Snowflake Go Driver","version":"affected 2.2.0 semver","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Snowflake","product":"Snowflake JDBC Driver","version":"affected 4.3.4 maven","platforms":[]},{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Snowflake","product":"Snowflake Node.js Driver","version":"affected 3.3.0 npm","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"85525","cve":"CVE-2026-85525","epss":"0.001050000","percentile":"0.011610000","score_date":"2026-09-04","updated_at":"2026-09-05 00:04:12"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-85525","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"no"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-09-04T19:40:10.324793Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-04T19:40:26.454Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Snowflake Connector for Python","vendor":"Snowflake","versions":[{"lessThan":"4.7.3","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"python"}]},{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Snowflake Go Driver","vendor":"Snowflake","versions":[{"lessThan":"2.2.0","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"semver"}]},{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Snowflake JDBC Driver","vendor":"Snowflake","versions":[{"lessThan":"4.3.4","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"maven"}]},{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Snowflake Node.js Driver","vendor":"Snowflake","versions":[{"lessThan":"3.3.0","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"npm"}]}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"Improper OCSP response validation in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, and Node.js drivers allowed a revoked TLS certificate to be accepted as valid, because OCSP responses were not reliably bound to the certificate being validated and definitive verification failures were treated as transient. A man-in-the-middle attacker holding a revoked certificate and its private key for a Snowflake or stage hostname could cause the driver to establish a TLS session to the attacker-controlled endpoint anyway, allowing the attacker to read and modify data transmitted within that connection. Successful exploitation requires that on-path position and the corresponding private key, and impact is limited to data carried within the intercepted connection. The fix is available in the patched versions listed above. Users must manually upgrade."}],"metrics":[{"cvssV3_1":{"attackComplexity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","availabilityImpact":"NONE","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","userInteraction":"NONE","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","version":"3.1"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-295","description":"Improper Certificate Validation","lang":"en","type":"CWE"},{"cweId":"CWE-347","description":"Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-09-04T08:22:43.369Z","orgId":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","shortName":"SNOWFLAKE"},"references":[{"name":"Snowflake Connector for Python Release Notes","url":"https://github.com/snowflakedb/snowflake-connector-python/releases/tag/v4.7.3"},{"name":"Snowflake Go Driver Release Notes","url":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/golang-2026"},{"name":"Snowflake JDBC Driver Release Notes","url":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/jdbc-2026"},{"name":"Snowflake Node.js Driver Release Notes","url":"https://docs.snowflake.com/en/release-notes/clients-drivers/nodejs-2026"}],"title":"Improper OCSP response validation in Snowflake drivers","x_generator":{"engine":"cvelib 1.8.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","assignerShortName":"SNOWFLAKE","cveId":"CVE-2026-85525","datePublished":"2026-09-04T08:22:43.369Z","dateReserved":"2026-09-04T08:19:50.886Z","dateUpdated":"2026-09-04T19:40:26.454Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-09-04 09:17:11","lastModifiedDate":"2026-09-04 20:17:32","problem_types":["CWE-295","CWE-347","CWE-295 Improper Certificate Validation","CWE-347 Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV31":[{"source":"412d305a-227d-44f9-a262-a31ba44f2aea","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"3.1","vectorString":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N","baseScore":7.4,"baseSeverity":"HIGH","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"HIGH","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","scope":"UNCHANGED","confidentialityImpact":"HIGH","integrityImpact":"HIGH","availabilityImpact":"NONE"},"exploitabilityScore":2.2,"impactScore":5.2}],"ssvcV203":[{"source":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","ssvcData":{"timestamp":"2026-09-04T19:40:10.324793Z","id":"CVE-2026-85525","options":[{"exploitation":"none"},{"automatable":"no"},{"technicalImpact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","version":"2.0.3"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"85525","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Improper OCSP response validation in Snowflake drivers","CVE":"CVE-2026-85525","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"85525","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Improper OCSP response validation in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, and Node.js drivers allowed a revoked TLS certificate to be accepted as valid, because OCSP responses were not reliably bound to the certificate being validated and definitive verification failures were treated as transient. A man-in-the-middle attacker holding a revoked certificate and its private key for a Snowflake or stage hostname could cause the driver to establish a TLS session to the attacker-controlled endpoint anyway, allowing the attacker to read and modify data transmitted within that connection. Successful exploitation requires that on-path position and the corresponding private key, and impact is limited to data carried within the intercepted connection. The fix is available in the patched versions listed above. Users must manually upgrade.","Type":"Description","Title":"Improper OCSP response validation in Snowflake drivers"}]}}}