{"api_version":"1","generated_at":"2026-06-01T21:32:00+00:00","cve":"CVE-2026-9058","urls":{"html":"https://cve.report/CVE-2026-9058","api":"https://cve.report/api/cve/CVE-2026-9058.json","docs":"https://cve.report/api","cve_org":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9058","nvd":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9058"},"summary":{"title":"Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK","description":"Szafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0, \"Positively verified\") even when the trust status of the signer's certificate could not be established (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == \"nondetermined\"). This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.\n\nThis issue was fixed in version 463.","state":"PUBLISHED","assigner":"CERT-PL","published_at":"2026-05-25 14:16:27","updated_at":"2026-05-26 19:59:22"},"problem_types":["CWE-393","CWE-637","CWE-637 CWE-637 Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')","CWE-393 CWE-393: Return of Wrong Status Code"],"metrics":[{"version":"4.0","source":"cvd@cert.pl","type":"Secondary","score":"9.3","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","data":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":9.3,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}},{"version":"4.0","source":"CNA","type":"CVSS","score":"9.3","severity":"CRITICAL","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","data":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":9.3,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"}}],"references":[{"url":"https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/","name":"https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://cert.pl/posts/2026/05/CVE-2026-9058","name":"https://cert.pl/posts/2026/05/CVE-2026-9058","refsource":"cvd@cert.pl","tags":[],"title":"","mime":"","httpstatus":"","archivestatus":"0"},{"url":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9058","name":"CVE Program record","refsource":"CVE.ORG","tags":["canonical"]},{"url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9058","name":"NVD vulnerability detail","refsource":"NVD","tags":["canonical","analysis"]}],"affected":[{"source":"CNA","vendor":"Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa","product":"Szafir SDK","version":"affected 463 custom","platforms":[]}],"timeline":[],"solutions":[],"workarounds":[],"exploits":[],"credits":[{"source":"CNA","value":"Michał Leszczyński (icedev.pl)","lang":"en"}],"nvd_cpes":[],"vendor_comments":[],"enrichments":{"kev":null,"epss":{"cve_year":"2026","cve_id":"9058","cve":"CVE-2026-9058","epss":"0.000440000","percentile":"0.138740000","score_date":"2026-05-31","updated_at":"2026-06-01 00:08:20"},"legacy_qids":[]},"source_records":{"cve_program":{"containers":{"adp":[{"metrics":[{"other":{"content":{"id":"CVE-2026-9058","options":[{"Exploitation":"none"},{"Automatable":"yes"},{"Technical Impact":"total"}],"role":"CISA Coordinator","timestamp":"2026-05-26T15:57:55.171237Z","version":"2.0.3"},"type":"ssvc"}}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-05-26T15:58:01.602Z","orgId":"134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0","shortName":"CISA-ADP"},"title":"CISA ADP Vulnrichment"}],"cna":{"affected":[{"defaultStatus":"unaffected","product":"Szafir SDK","vendor":"Krajowa Izba Rozliczeniowa","versions":[{"lessThan":"463","status":"affected","version":"0","versionType":"custom"}]}],"credits":[{"lang":"en","type":"finder","value":"Michał Leszczyński (icedev.pl)"}],"descriptions":[{"lang":"en","supportingMedia":[{"base64":false,"type":"text/html","value":"<span style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\">Szafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. <i>/VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0,</i> \"Positively verified\") even when the trust status of the signer's certificate could not be established (i.e. <i>/VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == \"nondetermined\")</i>. This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.<br></span><br>This issue was fixed in version <span style=\"background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);\">463</span>."}],"value":"Szafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0, \"Positively verified\") even when the trust status of the signer's certificate could not be established (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == \"nondetermined\"). This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.\n\nThis issue was fixed in version 463."}],"impacts":[{"capecId":"CAPEC-115","descriptions":[{"lang":"en","value":"CAPEC-115 Authentication Bypass"}]}],"metrics":[{"cvssV4_0":{"Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","attackVector":"NETWORK","baseScore":9.3,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","privilegesRequired":"NONE","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N","version":"4.0","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED"},"format":"CVSS","scenarios":[{"lang":"en","value":"GENERAL"}]}],"problemTypes":[{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-637","description":"CWE-637 Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]},{"descriptions":[{"cweId":"CWE-393","description":"CWE-393: Return of Wrong Status Code","lang":"en","type":"CWE"}]}],"providerMetadata":{"dateUpdated":"2026-05-25T13:23:09.157Z","orgId":"4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6","shortName":"CERT-PL"},"references":[{"tags":["third-party-advisory"],"url":"https://cert.pl/posts/2026/05/CVE-2026-9058"},{"tags":["product"],"url":"https://www.elektronicznypodpis.pl/"}],"source":{"discovery":"EXTERNAL"},"title":"Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK","x_generator":{"engine":"Vulnogram 0.2.0"}}},"cveMetadata":{"assignerOrgId":"4bb8329e-dd38-46c1-aafb-9bf32bcb93c6","assignerShortName":"CERT-PL","cveId":"CVE-2026-9058","datePublished":"2026-05-25T13:23:09.157Z","dateReserved":"2026-05-20T06:36:10.929Z","dateUpdated":"2026-05-26T15:58:01.602Z","state":"PUBLISHED"},"dataType":"CVE_RECORD","dataVersion":"5.2"},"nvd":{"publishedDate":"2026-05-25 14:16:27","lastModifiedDate":"2026-05-26 19:59:22","problem_types":["CWE-393","CWE-637","CWE-637 CWE-637 Unnecessary Complexity in Protection Mechanism (Not Using 'Economy of Mechanism')","CWE-393 CWE-393: Return of Wrong Status Code"],"metrics":{"cvssMetricV40":[{"source":"cvd@cert.pl","type":"Secondary","cvssData":{"version":"4.0","vectorString":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","baseScore":9.3,"baseSeverity":"CRITICAL","attackVector":"NETWORK","attackComplexity":"LOW","attackRequirements":"NONE","privilegesRequired":"NONE","userInteraction":"NONE","vulnConfidentialityImpact":"HIGH","vulnIntegrityImpact":"HIGH","vulnAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","subConfidentialityImpact":"NONE","subIntegrityImpact":"NONE","subAvailabilityImpact":"NONE","exploitMaturity":"NOT_DEFINED","confidentialityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","integrityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","availabilityRequirement":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackVector":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackComplexity":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedAttackRequirements":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedPrivilegesRequired":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedUserInteraction":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedVulnAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubConfidentialityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubIntegrityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","modifiedSubAvailabilityImpact":"NOT_DEFINED","Safety":"NOT_DEFINED","Automatable":"NOT_DEFINED","Recovery":"NOT_DEFINED","valueDensity":"NOT_DEFINED","vulnerabilityResponseEffort":"NOT_DEFINED","providerUrgency":"NOT_DEFINED"}}]},"configurations":[]},"legacy_mitre":{"record":{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"9058","Ordinal":"1","Title":"Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK","CVE":"CVE-2026-9058","Year":"2026"},"notes":[{"CveYear":"2026","CveId":"9058","Ordinal":"1","NoteData":"Szafir SDK returns a success status code from the cryptographic digital signature verification process (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/Result/@code == 0, \"Positively verified\") even when the trust status of the signer's certificate could not be established (i.e. /VerifyingTaskItem/Signature/VerificationResult/SigningCertificate/@certificateType == \"nondetermined\"). This causes consuming applications to incorrectly treat the signature as valid despite an unverified certificate chain, enabling authentication bypass and user impersonation.\n\nThis issue was fixed in version 463.","Type":"Description","Title":"Improper Certificate Verification in Szafir SDK"}]}}}